Hepp Johanna, Niedtfeld Inga, Schulze Lars
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universität Berlin.
Personal Disord. 2023 Jan;14(1):50-61. doi: 10.1037/per0000588.
Studies using experimental paradigms have been paramount in research on psychopathological processes in personality disorders (PDs). We review 99 articles that report experimental paradigms and that were published between 2017 and 2021 in 13 peer-reviewed journals. We structure the study content according to the National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), and report details on demographic variables, experimental design, sample size, and statistical analyses. We discuss unequal representation of the RDoC domains, representativeness of the recruited clinical groups, and a lack of sample diversity. Finally, we review issues regarding statistical power and the data analytic designs that were used. Based on the literature review, we draw implications for future experimental PD research, encouraging researchers to increase the breadth of represented RDoC constructs, the representativeness and diversity of the recruited samples, the statistical power to detect between-person effects, the reliability of estimators, the adequacy of statistical methods, and the transparency of experimental research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
使用实验范式的研究在人格障碍（PDs）心理病理过程的研究中至关重要。我们回顾了99篇报告实验范式的文章，这些文章于2017年至2021年期间发表在13种同行评审期刊上。我们根据美国国立精神卫生研究所研究领域标准（RDoC）构建研究内容，并报告人口统计学变量、实验设计、样本量和统计分析的详细信息。我们讨论了RDoC领域的不均衡代表性、所招募临床群体的代表性以及样本缺乏多样性的问题。最后，我们回顾了关于统计功效和所使用数据分析设计的问题。基于文献综述，我们得出了对未来人格障碍实验研究的启示，鼓励研究人员增加所代表的RDoC结构的广度、所招募样本的代表性和多样性、检测个体间效应的统计功效、估计量的可靠性、统计方法的充分性以及实验研究的透明度。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2023美国心理学会，保留所有权利）
