• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮左心室辅助装置(Impella)的微创左心室卸载可能改善暴发性心肌炎的临床结局。

Less Invasive Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella May Improve the Clinical Outcomes of Fulminant Myocarditis.

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2023 Jun 1;69(6):561-568. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001907. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000001907
PMID:36848874
Abstract

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) has a high mortality rate. Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are sometimes insufficient to induce cardiac recovery. For patients with FM refractory to VA-ECMO with IABP, we have applied a biventricular assist device (BIVAD) or Impella to unload the left ventricle and to fully support the systemic circulation. In the last 10 years, 37 refractory FM patients histologically diagnosed with myocarditis and who did not recover with VA-ECMO were treated with BIVAD (n = 19) or Impella (n = 18). No significant difference was found between the Impella and BIVAD groups in preoperative findings other than serum creatinine level. Seventeen of 18 patients in the Impella group were successfully weaned from t-MCS in 9 (6-12) days. Conversely, the temporary BIVAD was removed in 21 (11-38) days in 10 of 19 patients. Six patients died while on temporary BIVAD because of multiple organ failure and cerebral bleeding, and three patients required conversion to implantable VAD. Compared with BIVAD, left ventricular unloading with Impella could be less invasive and could promote cardiac recovery in refractory FM patients. The Impella has the potential to provide effective temporary MCS for FM patients.

摘要

暴发性心肌炎(FM)需要临时机械循环支持(t-MCS),死亡率较高。外周静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)和主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)有时不足以诱导心脏恢复。对于 FM 患者,VA-ECMO 联合 IABP 无效,我们应用双心室辅助装置(BIVAD)或 Impella 来减轻左心室负荷并充分支持全身循环。在过去 10 年中,我们对 37 例经组织学诊断为心肌炎且 VA-ECMO 治疗无效的难治性 FM 患者应用 BIVAD(n = 19)或 Impella(n = 18)治疗。除血清肌酐水平外,Impella 组和 BIVAD 组在术前发现方面无显著差异。18 例 Impella 组患者中有 17 例在 9(6-12)天内成功脱离 t-MCS。相反,19 例患者中有 10 例 BIVAD 在 21(11-38)天内被移除。6 例患者因多器官衰竭和脑出血而在使用临时 BIVAD 时死亡,3 例患者需要转为植入式 VAD。与 BIVAD 相比,Impella 减轻左心室负荷可能创伤更小,并能促进难治性 FM 患者的心脏恢复。Impella 有可能为 FM 患者提供有效的临时 MCS。

相似文献

1
Less Invasive Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella May Improve the Clinical Outcomes of Fulminant Myocarditis.经皮左心室辅助装置(Impella)的微创左心室卸载可能改善暴发性心肌炎的临床结局。
ASAIO J. 2023 Jun 1;69(6):561-568. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001907. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
2
Clinical efficacy of direct or indirect left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary cardiogenic shock.在心肺体外膜氧合治疗原发性心源性休克期间直接或间接左心室卸载的临床疗效。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;165(2):699-707.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
The impact of temporary mechanical circulatory support strategies on thrombocytopenia.临时机械循环支持策略对血小板减少症的影响。
J Crit Care. 2023 Feb;73:154216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154216. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant Impella versus concomitant intra-aortic-balloon-pump for cardiogenic shock.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合联合 Impella 与联合主动脉内球囊泵治疗心源性休克。
Perfusion. 2023 Jan;38(1):51-57. doi: 10.1177/02676591211033947. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
5
Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Observational Study.心源性休克患者接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗时,Impella与主动脉内球囊泵的比较:一项观察性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e032607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032607. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Total percutaneous biventricular assist device implantation for fulminant myocarditis.经皮全心室辅助装置植入术治疗暴发性心肌炎。
J Artif Organs. 2021 Jun;24(2):254-257. doi: 10.1007/s10047-020-01197-6. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Fulminant myocarditis in adults and children: bi-ventricular assist device for recovery.成人及儿童暴发性心肌炎:双心室辅助装置促进恢复
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Dec;26(6):1169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.059.
8
In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Concomitant Use of Impella vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump - A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Japanese Claims-Based Database.在使用依拉通(Impella)与主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)辅助的心肺复苏后并发心源性休克的患者中,院内死亡率与使用依拉通(Impella) vs. 主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)辅助治疗 - 使用日本索赔数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Circ J. 2024 Jul 25;88(8):1276-1285. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0758. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
9
Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella Versus IABP in Patients With VA-ECMO: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)患者中使用Impella与主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)进行左心室卸载:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 1;208:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.023. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
10
Temporary biventricular support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a feasible therapeutic approach for cardiogenic shock with multiple organ failure.体外膜肺氧合临时双心室支持:治疗心源性休克合并多器官功能衰竭的一种可行方法。
J Artif Organs. 2017 Sep;20(3):206-214. doi: 10.1007/s10047-017-0966-5. Epub 2017 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of patients with fulminant myocarditis.暴发性心肌炎患者的诊断与管理
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Feb 4;27(Suppl 4):iv23-iv30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf004. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Effectiveness of an Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Who Received Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.接受体外膜肺氧合治疗的患者中,Impella与主动脉内球囊反搏的疗效比较
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):e037652. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037652. Epub 2025 Feb 3.