• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,英国在线服务中紧急避孕药和口服避孕药的使用模式:一项常规收集数据的定量研究。

Patterns of use of emergency and oral contraceptives from an online service in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative study of routinely collected data.

机构信息

SH:24, London, UK.

SH:24, London, UK.

出版信息

Contraception. 2023 Jun;122:109992. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109992. Epub 2023 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109992
PMID:36849031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9968475/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to describe users of a free online contraception service, compare online emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) users with online oral contraceptive (OC) users, and describe patterns of use of online ECP and OC over time, including transition from ECP to more effective forms of contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of routinely collected, anonymized data from a large, publicly funded, online contraceptive service in the United Kingdom from April 1, 2019 to October 31, 2021.

RESULTS

The online service provided 77,447 prescriptions during the study period. About 84% for OC and 16% for ECP, of which 89% were ulipristal acetate. ECP users were younger, lived in more deprived areas, and were less likely to be of white ethnicity than OC users. About 53% ordered OC only, but 37% ordered both ECP and OC. Among those prescribed both OC and ECP (n = 1306), 40% had one method as dominant, 25% appeared to move from one method to the other (11% ECP to OC, 14% OC to ECP), and 35% continued to use both methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Online services are accessible to diverse young populations. While the majority of users order OC only, our study suggests that where there is free, online access to both OC and ECP, and those ordering ECP are always offered free OC, transition to more effective ongoing forms of contraception is uncommon. Further research is needed to understand whether online access to ECP increases its attractiveness and reduces likelihood of transition to OC.

IMPLICATIONS

This study demonstrates that free, online contraceptive services are accessible to ethnically and socioeconomically diverse users. It identifies a subgroup of contraceptive users who combine use of OC and ECPs over time, and suggests that improved access to ECP may alter contraceptive choices.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一个免费在线避孕药具服务的用户,比较在线紧急避孕药(ECP)使用者和在线口服避孕药(OC)使用者,并描述 ECP 和 OC 的使用模式随时间的变化,包括从 ECP 向更有效的避孕方法的转变。

研究设计

对英国一个大型公共资助的在线避孕药具服务机构在 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日期间收集的常规匿名数据进行分析。

结果

在研究期间,在线服务提供了 77447 份处方。大约 84%用于 OC,16%用于 ECP,其中 89%为乌利司他酮。ECP 用户更年轻,居住在更贫困的地区,并且种族为白人的比例低于 OC 用户。大约 53%仅订购 OC,但 37%同时订购 ECP 和 OC。在同时开处 OC 和 ECP 的人中(n=1306),40%有一种方法占主导地位,25%似乎从一种方法转向另一种方法(11%从 ECP 转为 OC,14%从 OC 转为 ECP),35%继续同时使用两种方法。

结论

在线服务对不同的年轻人群是可及的。虽然大多数用户仅订购 OC,但我们的研究表明,在免费、在线提供 OC 和 ECP 的情况下,并且对订购 ECP 的人总是免费提供 OC 的情况下,向更有效的持续避孕方法的转变并不常见。需要进一步研究,以了解在线获取 ECP 是否会增加其吸引力并降低向 OC 转变的可能性。

意义

本研究表明,免费的在线避孕药具服务对种族和社会经济背景不同的用户是可及的。它确定了一个在一段时间内同时使用 OC 和 ECP 的避孕用户亚组,并表明改善 ECP 的获取途径可能会改变避孕选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/9968475/5cc143c2b64b/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/9968475/899c5c793dec/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/9968475/5cc143c2b64b/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/9968475/899c5c793dec/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/9968475/5cc143c2b64b/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Patterns of use of emergency and oral contraceptives from an online service in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative study of routinely collected data.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,英国在线服务中紧急避孕药和口服避孕药的使用模式:一项常规收集数据的定量研究。
Contraception. 2023 Jun;122:109992. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109992. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
2
Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.女性对正确服用口服避孕药及紧急避孕的认知:在全科医疗中提供信息传单的效果
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Aug;45(397):409-14.
3
Survey of knowledge and practice on oral contraceptive and emergency contraceptive pills of drugstore personnel in Hat Yai, Thailand.泰国合艾药店工作人员口服避孕药和紧急避孕药知识与实践调查
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Mar-Apr;10(2):149-56. doi: 10.1002/pds.573.
4
10 common questions on emergency contraception.关于紧急避孕的10个常见问题。
Contracept Technol Update. 1998 Jan;19(1):6, 11-2.
5
Contraception in Person-Contraception Online (CiP-CO) cohort study.避孕在线(CiP-CO)队列研究中的避孕措施。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Apr;48(2):93-102. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201168. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Latest views on pill prescribing.关于药丸处方的最新观点。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Nov;34(268):611-4.
7
Safety implications of transferring the oral contraceptive from prescription-only to over-the-counter status.将口服避孕药从仅凭处方购买改为非处方状态的安全性影响。
Drug Saf. 1995 Dec;13(6):333-7. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199513060-00002.
8
Postcoital pills could cut unplanned pregnancies by half.事后避孕药可将意外怀孕率减半。
Contracept Technol Update. 1993 Mar;14(3):33-6, 39.
9
Bridging emergency contraceptive pill users to regular contraception: results from a randomized trial in Jamaica.将紧急避孕丸使用者与常规避孕方法衔接:来自牙买加的一项随机试验结果。
Contraception. 2010 Feb;81(2):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
10
A new wave in the quiet revolution in contraceptive use in Nepal: the rise of emergency contraception.尼泊尔避孕使用悄然变革中的新一波浪潮:紧急避孕的兴起。
Reprod Health. 2016 May 4;13(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0155-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital first during the COVID-19 pandemic: does ethnicity matter?新冠疫情期间的数字优先策略:种族因素重要吗?
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e628-e630. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00186-9. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
Use of effective contraception following provision of the progestogen-only pill for women presenting to community pharmacies for emergency contraception (Bridge-It): a pragmatic cluster-randomised crossover trial.在为到社区药店寻求紧急避孕的妇女提供孕激素避孕药后使用有效避孕措施(Bridge-It):一项实用的群组随机交叉试验。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1585-1594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31785-2.
3
Expanding choice through online contraception: a theory of change to inform service development and evaluation.
通过在线避孕扩大选择:一个变革理论,用于指导服务开发和评估。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Apr;46(2):108-115. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200297. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
4
State of emergency contraception in the U.S., 2018.2018年美国紧急避孕状况
Contracept Reprod Med. 2018 Sep 5;3:20. doi: 10.1186/s40834-018-0067-8. eCollection 2018.
5
Where do women and men in Britain obtain contraception? Findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).英国的男性和女性从何处获取避孕措施?第三次全国性态度与生活方式调查(Natsal-3)的结果
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Jan;44(1):16-26. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101728. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
6
Trends in the use of emergency contraception in Britain: evidence from the second and third National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.英国紧急避孕措施使用趋势:来自第二次和第三次全国性性行为态度和生活方式调查的证据。
BJOG. 2016 Sep;123(10):1600-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14131. Epub 2016 May 31.
7
Using Longitudinal Data to Understand Changes in Consistent Contraceptive Use.利用纵向数据了解持续避孕措施使用情况的变化。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Sep;47(3):131-9. doi: 10.1363/47e4615. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
8
Stopping and switching contraceptive methods: findings from Contessa, a prospective longitudinal study of women of reproductive age in England.停止和更换避孕方法:来自Contessa的研究结果,一项对英国育龄女性的前瞻性纵向研究
Contraception. 2015 Jan;91(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
9
Use of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a follow-up study.醋酸乌利司他和左炔诺孕酮用于紧急避孕的随访研究。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015 Apr;41(2):116-21. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100733. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
The effect on use of making emergency contraception available free of charge.免费提供紧急避孕措施的效果。
Contraception. 2012 Oct;86(4):366-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Mar 28.