Suppr超能文献

以公共卫生批判种族理论为指导的充血性心力衰竭质量改进计划在内科住院患者中的应用。

A Public Health Critical Race Praxis Informed Congestive Heart Failure Quality Improvement Initiative on Inpatient General Medicine.

机构信息

Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(10):2236-2244. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08086-7. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior evaluation at our hospital demonstrated that, compared to White patients, Black and Latinx patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) were less likely to be admitted to the cardiology service rather than the general medicine service (GMS). Patients admitted to GMS (compared to cardiology) had inferior rates of cardiology follow-up and 30-day readmission.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test the feasibility and impacts of using quality improvement (QI) methods, in combination with the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) framework, to engage stakeholders in developing an intervention for ensuring guideline-concordant inpatient CHF care across all patient groups.

METHODS

We compared measures for all patients admitted with CHF to GMS between September 2019 and March 2020 (intervention group) to CHF patients admitted to GMS in the previous year (pre-intervention group) and those admitted to cardiology during the pre-intervention and intervention periods (cardiology group). Our primary measures were 30-day readmissions and 14- and 30-day post-discharge cardiology follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 79 patients admitted with CHF to GMS during the intervention period, all of whom received the intervention. There were similar rates of Black and Latinx patients across the three groups. Compared to pre-intervention, intervention patients had a significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (18.9% vs. 24.8%; p=0.024), though the cardiology group also had a decrease in 30-day readmissions from the pre-intervention to intervention period. Compared to pre-intervention, intervention patients had significantly higher 14-day and 30-day post-discharge follow-up visits scheduled with cardiology (36.7% vs. 24.8%, p=0.005; 55.7% vs. 42.3%, p=0.0029), but no improvement in appointment attendance.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a first test of applying the PHCRP framework within a stakeholder-engaged QI initiative for improving CHF care across races and ethnicities. Our study design cannot evaluate causation. However, the improvements in 30-day readmission, as well as in processes of care that may affect it, provide optimism that inclusion of a racism-conscious framework in QI initiatives is feasible and may enhance QI measures.

摘要

背景

我院先前的评估表明,与白人患者相比,充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的黑人和拉丁裔患者更不可能被收入心内科,而是收入普通内科(GMS)。收入 GMS 的患者(与收入心内科相比)接受心内科随访以及 30 天再入院的比例较低。

目的

开发并测试使用质量改进(QI)方法,结合公共卫生关键种族实践(PHCRP)框架,让利益相关者参与制定一项干预措施,以确保所有患者群体的住院 CHF 治疗符合指南,这一方法的可行性和影响。

方法

我们比较了 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 3 月期间收入 GMS 的所有 CHF 患者(干预组)与前一年收入 GMS 的 CHF 患者(干预前组)以及同期收入心内科的患者(心内科组)之间 GMS 治疗的各项指标。我们的主要指标是 30 天再入院率和 14 天及 30 天的出院后心内科随访率。

结果

干预期间有 79 例 CHF 患者收入 GMS,所有患者均接受了干预措施。三组中黑人和拉丁裔患者的比例相似。与干预前相比,干预组的 30 天再入院率显著降低(18.9% vs. 24.8%;p=0.024),尽管心内科组的 30 天再入院率也从干预前下降。与干预前相比,干预组的患者与心内科预约 14 天和 30 天的随访的比例明显更高(36.7% vs. 24.8%,p=0.005;55.7% vs. 42.3%,p=0.0029),但预约就诊率无改善。

结论

本研究首次在一项利益相关者参与的 QI 计划中应用 PHCRP 框架,以改善不同种族和族裔的 CHF 护理。我们的研究设计不能评估因果关系。然而,30 天再入院率的改善,以及可能影响再入院率的治疗过程,都表明在 QI 计划中纳入种族意识框架是可行的,并且可能增强 QI 措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b272/10406748/73e6812aeaee/11606_2023_8086_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验