Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, 3601 S 6th Ave, Tucson, AZ 85723. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):e42-e47. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88588.
The evidence supporting early postdischarge hospital follow-up is limited. We implemented a new, multidisciplinary, multistrategy heart failure (HF) team approach that included new clinic slots, predischarge nurse visit, providing a blood pressure cuff and scale, and cardiologist supervision.
Pre- vs postintervention evaluation of outcomes in patients hospitalized with HF between September 1, 2010, and May 30, 2013. We utilized the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework to evaluate the intervention.
For the quantitative evaluation, we compared the proportion of patients in both groups who were scheduled for and completed a cardiology appointment within 7 days after hospitalization ("reach"). We created a Cox model to evaluate the "effectiveness" of the intervention period on a 30-day composite outcome (all-cause emergency department [ED] visit, all-cause hospitalization, or death). In qualitative evaluation, we describe the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention.
Data for 261 patients were analyzed (preintervention, n = 142; post intervention, n = 119). The postintervention period was associated with a higher proportion of patients who were referred to (40% vs 12%; P < .001) and completed (24% vs 10%; P = .003) cardiology follow-up within 7 days of hospital discharge (reach) compared with the preintervention period. After adjustment, the postintervention period was associated with a reduced hazard of the 30-day composite end point (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.96; P = .04) (effectiveness).
The intervention succeeded in increasing referral to and completion of cardiology appointments within 7 days of discharge. In adjusted analysis, the intervention was associated with lower risk of 30-day all-cause ED visits, all-cause hospitalizations, or death.
支持出院后早期医院随访的证据有限。我们实施了一种新的、多学科、多策略的心力衰竭(HF)团队方法,包括新的门诊预约、出院前护士访视、提供血压袖带和秤以及心脏病专家的监督。
对 2010 年 9 月 1 日至 2013 年 5 月 30 日期间因 HF 住院的患者进行干预前后的结局评估。我们利用 RE-AIM(可及性、效果、采用、实施和维持)框架来评估干预措施。
对于定量评估,我们比较了两组患者中在住院后 7 天内预约并完成心脏病就诊的比例(可及性)。我们创建了 Cox 模型来评估干预期对 30 天复合结局(所有原因急诊就诊、所有原因住院或死亡)的效果。在定性评估中,我们描述了干预措施的采用、实施和维持情况。
对 261 名患者的数据进行了分析(干预前,n=142;干预后,n=119)。与干预前相比,干预后时期有更高比例的患者被转诊(40%比 12%;P<0.001)并在出院后 7 天内完成(24%比 10%;P=0.003)心脏病学随访(可及性)。调整后,干预后时期与 30 天复合终点的风险降低相关(HR,0.59;95%CI,0.37-0.96;P=0.04)(效果)。
该干预措施成功地增加了出院后 7 天内转诊和完成心脏病学预约的数量。在调整分析中,该干预措施与 30 天内所有原因急诊就诊、所有原因住院或死亡的风险降低相关。