• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接血管内治疗与标准桥接治疗在大动脉前循环卒中的效果(DEVT):一项随机对照试验的 18 个月随访。

Effect of direct endovascular treatment versus standard bridging therapy in large artery anterior circulation stroke (DEVT): 18-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.

Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03111-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-023-03111-y
PMID:36849903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9969708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two trials in Chinese population showed that endovascular treatment (EVT) alone was noninferior to alteplase follow by EVT at 90 days. However, results of long-term clinical outcomes remain unknown. We reported the results of prespecified 18-month analysis of the DEVT trail.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed clinical outcomes 18 months after patients were randomly assigned to receive EVT alone or bridging therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary outcome was the proportion of functional independence [modified Rankin scale (mRS), 0-2] at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the quality of life at 18 months as measured by means of a health utility index according to the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-level scale (EQ-5D-5L). Kaplan-Meier event curves were used to investigate the risk of mortality in participants with EVT alone or bridging therapy.

RESULTS

Among 234 patients (EVT alone, n = 116; bridging therapy, n = 118) in the DEVT trial, only 231 (98.7%) patients were extended follow-up to 18 months. A total of 60 (51.7%) patients in the EVT alone achieved functional independence vs 56 (47.5%) patients in the bridging therapy (difference, 4.3%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, - 8.4% to ∞, P for noninferiority =0.014). No significant between-group difference was detected in EQ-5D-5L score (0.81 vs 0.73; difference, 0; 95% CI, 0 to 0.005). The cumulative mortality was 27.6% in the EVT alone and 28.8% in the bridging therapy.

CONCLUSION

At 18 months follow-up, EVT alone was noninferior to bridging therapy regarding favorable functional outcome in patients with AIS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-17013568) on 27/11/2017.

摘要

背景

两项针对中国人的临床试验表明,血管内治疗(EVT)单独治疗 90 天与阿替普酶联合 EVT 治疗非劣效。然而,长期临床结果尚不清楚。我们报告了 DEVT 试验预先设定的 18 个月分析结果。

材料和方法

我们评估了患者随机分配接受 EVT 单独治疗或急性缺血性卒中(AIS)桥接治疗后 18 个月的临床结果。主要结局是 18 个月时功能独立性的比例[改良 Rankin 量表(mRS),0-2]。次要结局包括全因死亡率和 18 个月时的生活质量,采用欧洲生活质量 5 维 5 级量表(EQ-5D-5L)测量健康效用指数。Kaplan-Meier 事件曲线用于研究接受 EVT 单独治疗或桥接治疗的参与者的死亡风险。

结果

在 DEVT 试验中,234 例患者(EVT 单独治疗组 n=116,桥接治疗组 n=118)中,仅 231 例(98.7%)患者延长至 18 个月随访。EVT 单独治疗组 60 例(51.7%)患者实现功能独立性,而桥接治疗组 56 例(47.5%)患者(差异 4.3%;单侧 97.5%CI,-8.4%至∞,非劣效性 P=0.014)。EQ-5D-5L 评分两组间无显著差异(0.81 比 0.73;差异 0;95%CI,0 至 0.005)。EVT 单独治疗组累积死亡率为 27.6%,桥接治疗组为 28.8%。

结论

18 个月随访时,EVT 单独治疗在 AIS 患者中的良好功能结局方面不劣于桥接治疗。

试验注册

试验于 2017 年 11 月 27 日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR-IOR-17013568)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/6499e9216f56/12883_2023_3111_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/93327ed482f9/12883_2023_3111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/5772e5d6535c/12883_2023_3111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/fe39c67e02b7/12883_2023_3111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/6499e9216f56/12883_2023_3111_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/93327ed482f9/12883_2023_3111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/5772e5d6535c/12883_2023_3111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/fe39c67e02b7/12883_2023_3111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed73/9969708/6499e9216f56/12883_2023_3111_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of direct endovascular treatment versus standard bridging therapy in large artery anterior circulation stroke (DEVT): 18-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.直接血管内治疗与标准桥接治疗在大动脉前循环卒中的效果(DEVT):一项随机对照试验的 18 个月随访。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03111-y.
2
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial.单纯血管内治疗与静脉溶栓联合血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能独立性的影响:DEVT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):234-243. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23523.
3
Patient-Reported Anxiety/Depression After Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Analysis of Direct-MT Trial.血管内血栓切除术治疗后患者报告的焦虑/抑郁:DIRECT-MT试验分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 9;13:811629. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.811629. eCollection 2022.
4
Bridging versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Pooled Meta-Analysis for Time of Intervention, Eligibility, and Study Design.桥接与直接机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的比较:基于干预时间、入选标准和研究设计的亚组汇总荟萃分析。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(2):223-232. doi: 10.1159/000507844. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
5
Endovascular thrombectomy or bridging therapy in minor ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.血管内血栓切除术或桥接治疗小面积缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞。
Thromb Res. 2022 Nov;219:150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.09.020. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
6
CT Hyperdense Artery Sign and the Effect of Alteplase in Endovascular Thrombectomy after Acute Stroke.CT 高密度动脉征与急性脑卒中血管内取栓后阿替普酶的效果。
Radiology. 2022 Nov;305(2):410-418. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212358. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
7
Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone vs. Bridging Thrombolysis for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Meta-analysis.单纯直接血管内血栓切除术与桥接溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Sep;32(3):603-613. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01116-z. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
8
Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy with and without Thrombolysis for Acute Large Artery Ischaemic Stroke at a Tertiary Stroke Centre.三级卒中中心急性大动脉缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术联合与不联合溶栓治疗的疗效
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2017;7(2):95-102. doi: 10.1159/000470855. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
A Randomized Trial of Intravenous Alteplase before Endovascular Treatment for Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗前静脉溶栓随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 11;385(20):1833-1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107727.
10
Endovascular therapy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke with tandem occlusion.急性串联性闭塞卒中血管内治疗联合或不联合静脉溶栓治疗。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Apr;14(4):314-320. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017202. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard bridging thrombolytic with endovascular thrombectomy within 4·5 h of stroke onset: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised non-inferiority trial.血管内血栓切除术与标准桥接溶栓联合血管内血栓切除术治疗脑卒中发病 4.5 小时内的随机非劣效性试验:开放标签、盲终点、随机对照研究。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):116-125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00564-5.
2
Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients with stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised non-inferiority trial.单纯取栓与静脉溶栓桥接取栓治疗脑卒中患者的效果比较:一项开放标签、盲法结局、随机非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):104-115. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00537-2.
3
A Randomized Trial of Intravenous Alteplase before Endovascular Treatment for Stroke.
急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗前静脉溶栓随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 11;385(20):1833-1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107727.
4
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial.单纯血管内治疗与静脉溶栓联合血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能独立性的影响:DEVT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):234-243. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23523.
5
Thrombectomy for Stroke in the Public Health Care System of Brazil.巴西公共医疗体系中的卒中取栓治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2316-2326. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000120.
6
DEVT: A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial of direct endovascular treatment versus standard bridging therapy for acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation - Protocol.DEVT:急性前循环大血管闭塞卒中患者直接血管内治疗与标准桥接治疗的随机、对照、多中心试验 - 方案。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Feb;16(2):229-235. doi: 10.1177/1747493020925349. Epub 2020 May 23.
7
Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke.血管内血栓切除术联合或不联合静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1981-1993. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001123. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Long-term neurological, vascular, and mortality outcomes after stroke.卒中后的长期神经、血管和死亡率结局。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Oct;13(8):787-796. doi: 10.1177/1747493018798526. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
9
Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial.机械取栓联合静脉溶栓与单纯静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的随机对照研究(THRACE)
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Oct;15(11):1138-47. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke.发病 8 小时内进行缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780. Epub 2015 Apr 17.