Suppr超能文献

与mRNA-1273相比,BNT162b2新冠病毒加强疫苗在先前接种过ChAdOx1或科兴疫苗的实体癌患者中的安全性。

Safety Following COVID-19 Booster Vaccine with BNT162b2 Compared to mRNA-1273 in Solid Cancer Patients Previously Vaccinated with ChAdOx1 or CoronaVac.

作者信息

Wanchaijiraboon Passakorn, Sainamthip Panot, Teeyapun Nattaya, Luangdilok Sutima, Poovorawan Yong, Wanlapakorn Nasamon, Tanasanvimon Suebpong, Sriuranpong Virote, Susiriwatananont Thiti, Zungsontiporn Nicha, Pakvisal Nussara

机构信息

Phrapokklao Cancer Center of Excellence, Phrapokklao Clinical Research Center, Phrapokklao Genomic Laboratories, Phrapokklao Hospital, Mueang District, Chantaburi 22000, Thailand.

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(2):356. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020356.

Abstract

Safety data following the COVID-19 booster mRNA vaccine in solid cancer patients are scarce. We prospectively evaluated adverse events after a booster dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine as compared to the mRNA-1273 vaccine in solid malignancy patients who had previously received two doses of ChAdOx1 or heterogenous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1. Data regarding solicited and unsolicited adverse events were collected using questionnaires. The primary endpoint was the difference in incidence and severity of adverse events between BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines. A total of 370 subjects were enrolled, including 172 (47%) and 198 (54%) patients receiving booster doses of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively. The overall incidence of adverse events in the two groups was comparable (BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273; 63% vs. 66%, = 0.6). There was no significant difference in severity, and the majority of adverse events reported were classed as mild to moderate. Tenderness at the injection site was the only reaction that had a statistically higher reported incidence after the mRNA-1273 vaccine than after the BNT162b2 vaccine (56% vs. 41%, = 0.003). In conclusion, a booster dose of the mRNA vaccine, either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, in solid cancer patients previously vaccinated with ChAdOx1 and CoronaVac appears safe, and no new safety concerns were observed.

摘要

实体癌患者接种新冠病毒加强针mRNA疫苗后的安全性数据匮乏。我们前瞻性评估了在先前已接种两剂ChAdOx1或异源CoronaVac/ChAdOx1的实体恶性肿瘤患者中,与mRNA - 1273疫苗相比,接种BNT162b2疫苗加强针后的不良事件。使用问卷收集有关主动和被动不良事件的数据。主要终点是BNT162b2和mRNA - 1273疫苗之间不良事件的发生率和严重程度差异。总共招募了370名受试者,分别有172名(47%)和198名(54%)患者接受了BNT162b2和mRNA - 1273疫苗的加强针。两组不良事件的总体发生率相当(BNT162b2组与mRNA - 1273组;63%对66%,P = 0.6)。严重程度无显著差异,报告的大多数不良事件被归类为轻度至中度。注射部位压痛是唯一在mRNA - 1273疫苗接种后报告发生率在统计学上高于BNT162b2疫苗接种后的反应(56%对41%,P = 0.003)。总之,在先前接种过ChAdOx1和CoronaVac的实体癌患者中,接种一剂BNT162b2或mRNA - 1273的mRNA疫苗加强针似乎是安全的,未观察到新的安全问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c5/9965854/a7faeabc7483/vaccines-11-00356-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验