Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 疫苗效力下降和加强针的有效性和副作用:来自 ZOE COVID 研究的一项前瞻性社区研究。

COVID-19 vaccine waning and effectiveness and side-effects of boosters: a prospective community study from the ZOE COVID Study.

机构信息

Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.

Zoe Limited, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;22(7):1002-1010. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00146-3. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the surge of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, countries have begun offering COVID-19 vaccine booster doses to high-risk groups and, more recently, to the adult population in general. However, uncertainty remains over how long primary vaccination series remain effective, the ideal timing for booster doses, and the safety of heterologous booster regimens. We aimed to investigate COVID-19 primary vaccine series effectiveness and its waning, and the safety and effectiveness of booster doses, in a UK community setting.

METHODS

We used SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates in individuals from a longitudinal, prospective, community-based study (ZOE COVID Study), in which data were self-reported through an app, to assess the effectiveness of three COVID-19 vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCov19 [Oxford-AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNtech], and mRNA1273 [Moderna]) against infection in the 8 months after completion of primary vaccination series. In individuals receiving boosters, we investigated vaccine effectiveness and reactogenicity, by assessing 16 self-reported systemic and localised side-effects. We used multivariate Poisson regression models adjusting for confounders to estimate vaccine effectiveness.

FINDINGS

We included 620 793 participants who received two vaccine doses (204 731 [33·0%] received BNT162b2, 405 239 [65·3%] received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and 10 823 [1·7%] received mRNA-1273) and subsequently had a SARS-CoV-2 test result between May 23 (chosen to exclude the period of alpha [B.1.1.7] variant dominance) and Nov 23, 2021. 62 172 (10·0%) vaccinated individuals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were compared with 40 345 unvaccinated controls (6726 [16·7%] of whom tested positive). Vaccine effectiveness waned after the second dose: at 5 months, BNT162b2 effectiveness was 82·1% (95% CI 81·3-82·9), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 effectiveness was 75·7% (74·9-76·4), and mRNA-1273 effectiveness was 84·3% (81·2-86·9). Vaccine effectiveness decreased more among individuals aged 55 years or older and among those with comorbidities. 135 932 individuals aged 55 years or older received a booster (2123 [1·6%] of whom tested positive). Vaccine effectiveness for booster doses in 0-3 months after BNT162b2 primary vaccination was higher than 92·5%, and effectiveness for heterologous boosters after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was at least 88·8%. For the booster reactogenicity analysis, in 317 011 participants, the most common systemic symptom was fatigue (in 31 881 [10·1%] participants) and the most common local symptom was tenderness (in 187 767 [59·2%]). Systemic side-effects were more common for heterologous schedules (32 632 [17·9%] of 182 374) than for homologous schedules (17 707 [13·2%] of 134 637; odds ratio 1·5, 95% CI 1·5-1·6, p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

After 5 months, vaccine effectiveness remained high among individuals younger than 55 years. Booster doses restore vaccine effectiveness. Adverse reactions after booster doses were similar to those after the second dose. Homologous booster schedules had fewer reported systemic side-effects than heterologous boosters.

FUNDING

Wellcome Trust, ZOE, National Institute for Health Research, Chronic Disease Research Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council.

摘要

背景

随着新型 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的出现,各国开始向高危人群以及最近向一般成年人群提供 COVID-19 疫苗加强针。然而,对于初级疫苗系列的有效性持续时间、加强针的理想时间以及异源加强针方案的安全性仍存在不确定性。我们旨在研究英国社区环境中 COVID-19 初级疫苗系列的有效性及其衰减情况,以及加强针的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们使用来自纵向、前瞻性、基于社区的研究(ZOE COVID 研究)中个体的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性率来评估三种 COVID-19 疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCov19[牛津-阿斯利康]、BNT162b2[辉瑞-生物技术]和 mRNA1273[莫德纳])在完成初级疫苗系列接种后 8 个月内对感染的有效性。在接受加强针的个体中,我们通过评估 16 种自我报告的全身性和局部副作用,调查了疫苗的有效性和反应原性。我们使用多变量泊松回归模型调整混杂因素来估计疫苗的有效性。

结果

我们纳入了 620793 名接受了两剂疫苗接种的参与者(204731 名接受了 BNT162b2,405239 名接受了 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19,10823 名接受了 mRNA-1273),随后在 5 月 23 日(选择该日期以排除 alpha[B.1.1.7]变体主导期)和 2021 年 11 月 23 日期间进行了 SARS-CoV-2 检测。62172 名(10.0%)接种疫苗的个体 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性,并与 40345 名未接种疫苗的对照个体(其中 6726 名[16.7%]检测呈阳性)进行了比较。第二次接种后疫苗有效性下降:在 5 个月时,BNT162b2 的有效性为 82.1%(95%CI 81.3-82.9),ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 的有效性为 75.7%(74.9-76.4),mRNA-1273 的有效性为 84.3%(81.2-86.9)。55 岁及以上年龄组和伴有合并症的个体中疫苗有效性下降更为明显。135932 名 55 岁及以上年龄的个体接受了加强针(其中 2123 名[1.6%]检测呈阳性)。BNT162b2 初级接种后 0-3 个月内的加强针有效性高于 92.5%,而 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 后的异源加强针至少为 88.8%。对于加强针反应原性分析,在 317011 名参与者中,最常见的全身症状是疲劳(31881 名[10.1%]参与者),最常见的局部症状是压痛(187767 名[59.2%]参与者)。异源方案(182374 例中有 32632 例[17.9%])的全身副作用比同源方案(134637 例中有 17707 例[13.2%];比值比 1.5,95%CI 1.5-1.6,p<0.0001)更为常见。

结论

5 个月后,55 岁以下人群的疫苗有效性仍然很高。加强针可恢复疫苗的有效性。加强针后的不良反应与第二次接种后的不良反应相似。同源加强针方案的全身副作用报告少于异源加强针方案。

资金来源

威康信托基金会、ZOE、英国国家卫生研究院、慢性疾病研究基金会、美国国立卫生研究院、医学研究理事会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4519/9630155/7581de74a385/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验