Teeyapun Nattaya, Luangdilok Sutima, Pakvisal Nussara, Sainamthip Panot, Mingmalairak Siyamol, Poovorawan Nattaya, Sitthideatphaiboon Piyada, Parinyanitikul Napa, Sriuranpong Virote, Namkanisorn Teerayuth, Inthasuwan Pratchaya, Angspatt Pattama, Wongchanapat Ploytuangporn, Bamrungnam Akradach, Leeleakpai Nutchanok, Uttha Sutheera, Jaichum Supaporn, Kongkaew Peerawich, Suksanong Chayanin, Veranitinun Rattiya, Prasomphol Ampai, Sartsuk Chada, Patcharajutanon Cheeraporn, Preaprang Supreeya, Choengsamor Hathairat, Phongwan Rungthong, Preeyasaksa Charoenpit, Phaibulvatanapong Ekkamol, Suntronwong Nungruthai, Yorsaeng Ritthideach, Vichaiwattana Preeyaporn, Wanlapakorn Nasamon, Kerr Stephen J, Poovorawan Yong, Wanchaijiraboon Passakorn, Tanasanvimon Suebpong
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Oct;52:101608. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101608. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
Limited data exists regarding the efficacy of ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 vaccine against Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) in solid cancer patients. We aimed to assess the immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 vaccine and the impact of different anticancer therapies for solid malignancies on immune response.
This prospective, longitudinal observational study of immunogenicity following ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 vaccination among 385 solid cancer patients on active cancer treatment was conducted in two oncology centers. Participants received the first dose between June 18 and July 27, 2021 and the second dose at 8-10 weeks later. Blood samples were evaluated for total immunoglobulins against the receptor-binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-RBD total-Ig) before, and 4-week after the first- and second-doses. The primary endpoint was the geometric mean titers (GMT) of antibody among solid cancer patients compared to healthy controls and the impact of different cancer treatment types.
Among solid cancer patients, the antibody level increased more slowly to significantly lower levels than achieved in healthy controls. The GMT at 4-weeks post-vaccination in cancer vs. healthy were 224.5 U/ml (95%CI 176.4-285.6) vs. 877.1 U/ml (95%CI 763.5-1008), <0.0001), respectively. For different types of cancer treatments, chemotherapy agents, especially anthracyclines (GMR 0.004; 95%CI 0.002-0.008), paclitaxel (GMR 0.268; 95%CI 0.123-0.581), oxaliplatin (GMR 0.340; 95%CI 0.165-0.484), and immunotherapy (GMR 0.203; 95%CI 0.109-0.381) showed significantly lower antibody response. Anti-HER2, endocrine therapy and 5-fluouracil or gemcitabine, however, had less impact on the immune response.
Suboptimal and heterogeneous immunologic responses were observed in cancer patients being treated with different systemic treatments. Immunotherapy or chemotherapy significantly suppressed the antibody response.
Quality Improvement Fund, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society and Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology at Chulalongkorn University and Chulalongkorn Medical Oncology Research Fund.
关于ChAdOx1-nCoV-19疫苗对实体癌患者中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的疗效数据有限。我们旨在评估ChAdOx1-nCoV-19疫苗的免疫原性以及不同实体恶性肿瘤抗癌疗法对免疫反应的影响。
这项针对385名正在接受积极癌症治疗的实体癌患者接种ChAdOx1-nCoV-19疫苗后免疫原性的前瞻性纵向观察研究在两个肿瘤中心进行。参与者于2021年6月18日至7月27日接受第一剂疫苗,并在8至10周后接受第二剂。在接种第一剂和第二剂之前及之后4周采集血样,评估针对SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白受体结合的总免疫球蛋白(抗RBD总Ig)。主要终点是实体癌患者与健康对照相比的抗体几何平均滴度(GMT)以及不同癌症治疗类型的影响。
在实体癌患者中,抗体水平上升较慢,显著低于健康对照者达到的水平。癌症患者与健康对照者在接种疫苗后4周的GMT分别为224.5 U/ml(95%CI 176.4 - 285.6)和877.1 U/ml(95%CI 763.5 - 1008),(P < 0.0001)。对于不同类型的癌症治疗,化疗药物,尤其是蒽环类药物(GMR 0.004;95%CI 0.002 - 0.008)、紫杉醇(GMR 0.268;95%CI 0.123 - 0.581)、奥沙利铂(GMR 0.340;95%CI 0.165 - 0.484)和免疫疗法(GMR 0.203;95%CI 0.109 - 0.381)显示出显著较低的抗体反应。然而,抗HER2、内分泌疗法以及5-氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨对免疫反应的影响较小。
在接受不同全身治疗的癌症患者中观察到免疫反应欠佳且存在异质性。免疫疗法或化疗显著抑制了抗体反应。
朱拉隆功国王纪念医院质量改进基金、泰国红十字会以及朱拉隆功大学临床病毒学卓越中心和朱拉隆功医学肿瘤学研究基金。