Hamilton David F, Akhtar Shehnaz, Griffiths Benjamin, Prior Yeliz, Jones Richard K
Research Centre for Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
School of Health and Society, Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Feb 9;5(2):100344. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100344. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Technological tools that promote the adoption of physical activity to increase individuals' functional ability in knee osteoarthritis (OA) are desired to support lifestyle interventions. However, there is little consensus as to the current use of such supportive interventions for knee OA. The aim of this scoping review is therefore to provide an overview on the current use of technology within lifestyle interventions for individuals with knee OA.
Scoping review as per PRISMA guidance. Structured search of Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, ELSEVIER, IEEExplore, GOOGLE Scholar, MEDLINE, PEDRO, PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE from 2010 to 2020 inclusive. Hits were screened by title and abstract and then full text review based on pre-defined criteria. Results were synthesised and pooled by theme for reporting.
2508 papers were identified, and following review, 78 studies included. Papers included interventions for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (n = 31), total or partial knee arthroplasty (n = 20) and developmental work in healthy controls (n = 27). Of the 78 studies, 47 were carried out in laboratory settings and 31 in the field. The identified themes included Movement measurement (n = 24), Tele-rehabilitation (n = 22), Biofeedback (n = 20), Directly applied interventions (n = 3), Virtual or augmented reality (n = 5) and Machine learning (n = 4).
The predominant current use of technology in OA lifestyle interventions is through well-established telecommunication and commercially available activity, joint angle and loading based measurement devices, while integrating new advanced technologies seems a longer-term goal. There is great potential for the engineering and clinical community to use technology to develop systems that offer real-time feedback to patients and clinician as part of rehabilitative interventions to inform treatment.
人们期望能借助促进身体活动以增强膝骨关节炎(OA)患者功能能力的技术工具来支持生活方式干预。然而,对于此类膝骨关节炎支持性干预措施的当前应用,人们几乎没有达成共识。因此,本范围综述的目的是概述目前技术在膝骨关节炎患者生活方式干预中的应用情况。
按照PRISMA指南进行范围综述。对Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、爱思唯尔、IEEE Xplore、谷歌学术、医学期刊数据库、PEDRO、PubMed、科学引文索引数据库进行2010年至2020年(含)的结构化检索。通过标题和摘要筛选命中结果,然后根据预先定义的标准进行全文审查。结果按主题进行综合和汇总以进行报告。
共识别出2508篇论文,经过审查,纳入78项研究。论文包括针对膝骨关节炎患者的干预措施(n = 31)、全膝关节置换术或部分膝关节置换术(n = 20)以及健康对照者的发育研究(n = 27)。在这78项研究中,47项在实验室环境中进行,31项在实际环境中进行。确定的主题包括运动测量(n = 24)、远程康复(n = 22)、生物反馈(n = 20)、直接应用的干预措施(n = 3)、虚拟现实或增强现实(n = 5)以及机器学习(n = 4)。
目前技术在骨关节炎生活方式干预中的主要应用是通过成熟的电信技术以及市售的基于活动、关节角度和负荷的测量设备,而整合新的先进技术似乎是一个长期目标。工程和临床领域有很大潜力利用技术开发系统,为患者和临床医生提供实时反馈,作为康复干预的一部分,为治疗提供依据。