• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅磁刺激前额皮质而非枕叶皮质会干扰内源性注意。

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.

Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 7;120(10):e2219635120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219635120. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2219635120
PMID:36853947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013745/
Abstract

Covert endogenous (voluntary) attention improves visual performance. Human neuroimaging studies suggest that the putative human homolog of macaque frontal eye fields (FEF+) is critical for this improvement, whereas early visual areas are not. Yet, correlational MRI methods do not manipulate brain function. We investigated whether rFEF+ or V1/V2 plays a causal role in endogenous attention. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to alter activity in the visual cortex or rFEF+ when observers performed an orientation discrimination task while attention was manipulated. On every trial, they received double-pulse TMS at a predetermined site (stimulated region) around V1/V2 or rFEF+. Two cortically magnified gratings were presented, one in the stimulated region (contralateral to the stimulated area) and another in the symmetric (ipsilateral) nonstimulated region. Grating contrast was varied to measure contrast response functions (CRFs) for all attention and stimulation combinations. In experiment 1, the CRFs were similar at the stimulated and nonstimulated regions, indicating that early visual areas do not modulate endogenous attention during stimulus presentation. In contrast, occipital TMS eliminates exogenous (involuntary) attention effects on performance [A. Fernández, M. Carrasco, , 4078-4084 (2020)]. In experiment 2, rFEF+ stimulation decreased the overall attentional effect; neither benefits at the attended location nor costs at the unattended location were significant. The frequency and directionality of microsaccades mimicked this pattern: Whereas occipital stimulation did not affect microsaccades, rFEF+ stimulation caused a higher microsaccade rate directed toward the stimulated hemifield. These results provide causal evidence of the role of this frontal region for endogenous attention.

摘要

内源性(自愿)注意力掩蔽可提高视觉表现。人类神经影像学研究表明,猕猴额眼区(FEF+)的假定人类同源物对于这种改善至关重要,而早期视觉区域则不然。然而,相关的 MRI 方法不能操纵大脑功能。我们研究了 rFEF+或 V1/V2 是否在内源性注意中起因果作用。当观察者在注意力被操纵的情况下执行方向辨别任务时,我们使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)改变视觉皮层或 rFEF+的活动。在每个试验中,他们在 V1/V2 或 rFEF+周围的预定部位(刺激部位)接受双脉冲 TMS。呈现两个皮质放大的光栅,一个在刺激区域(刺激区域的对侧),另一个在对称(同侧)的非刺激区域。光栅对比度变化以测量所有注意力和刺激组合的对比度响应函数(CRF)。在实验 1 中,刺激和非刺激区域的 CRF 相似,表明在刺激呈现期间早期视觉区域不会调节内源性注意力。相比之下,枕叶 TMS 消除了对外源性(非自愿)注意力对表现的影响[A. Fernández, M. Carrasco, 4078-4084 (2020)]。在实验 2 中,rFEF+刺激降低了整体注意力效应;在注意力集中的位置没有益处,在未注意的位置也没有成本。微扫视的频率和方向性也模仿了这种模式:虽然枕叶刺激不会影响微扫视,但 rFEF+刺激会导致更多指向刺激半视野的微扫视。这些结果提供了该额区对内源性注意力作用的因果证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/bcc6fcc6526c/pnas.2219635120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/312c0773adc2/pnas.2219635120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/3cb149c5b6f2/pnas.2219635120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/ff09a5684d80/pnas.2219635120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/bcc6fcc6526c/pnas.2219635120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/312c0773adc2/pnas.2219635120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/3cb149c5b6f2/pnas.2219635120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/ff09a5684d80/pnas.2219635120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/10013745/bcc6fcc6526c/pnas.2219635120fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention.经颅磁刺激前额皮质而非枕叶皮质会干扰内源性注意。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 7;120(10):e2219635120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219635120. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Extinguishing Exogenous Attention via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.经颅磁刺激消除外源性注意。
Curr Biol. 2020 Oct 19;30(20):4078-4084.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.068. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Frontal eye fields control attentional modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations in contralateral occipitoparietal cortex.额叶眼区控制对侧枕顶叶皮质中α和γ振荡的注意力调制。
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;35(4):1638-47. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3116-14.2015.
4
Dissociable roles of human frontal eye fields and early visual cortex in presaccadic attention - evidence from TMS.人类额叶眼区和早期视觉皮层在眼跳前注意力中的可分离作用——来自经颅磁刺激的证据
bioRxiv. 2023 Mar 1:2023.02.23.529691. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.23.529691.
5
Adaptation and exogenous attention interact in the early visual cortex: A TMS study.适应与外源性注意力在早期视觉皮层中相互作用:一项经颅磁刺激研究。
bioRxiv. 2024 Apr 18:2023.10.27.563093. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.27.563093.
6
Right frontal eye field has perceptual and oculomotor functions during optokinetic stimulation and nystagmus.在视动刺激和眼球震颤期间,右侧额眼区具有感知和眼球运动功能。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb 1;123(2):571-586. doi: 10.1152/jn.00468.2019. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
7
Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.经 TMS 探究分心物过滤的神经机制及其历史相关调制。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7591-7603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2740-18.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
8
Human microsaccade cueing modulation in visual- and memory-delay saccade tasks after theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation over the frontal eye field.额眼区经颅磁刺激的θ爆发刺激后,在视觉和记忆延迟眼跳任务中对人类微扫视提示的调制。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Aug 13;187:108626. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108626. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
9
Attention Reorients Periodically.注意力会定期重新定向。
Curr Biol. 2016 Jun 20;26(12):1595-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.046. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
10
Concurrent TMS-fMRI and psychophysics reveal frontal influences on human retinotopic visual cortex.同步经颅磁刺激-功能磁共振成像和心理物理学揭示额叶对人类视网膜拓扑视觉皮层的影响。
Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 8;16(15):1479-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.057.

引用本文的文献

1
The precision of attention controls attraction of population receptive fields.注意力的精准度控制着群体感受野的吸引力。
J Vis. 2025 Sep 2;25(11):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.11.3.
2
Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells and visual processing: ipRGCs beyond non-image-forming functions.内在光敏性视网膜神经节细胞与视觉处理:非成像功能之外的内在光敏性视网膜神经节细胞
Front Neurosci. 2025 Aug 5;19:1635101. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1635101. eCollection 2025.
3
Temporal attention and oculomotor effects dissociate distinct types of temporal expectation.

本文引用的文献

1
Microsaccades as a long-term oculomotor correlate in visual perceptual learning.微扫视作为视觉知觉学习的一种长期眼动相关指标。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):235-249. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02151-8. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Functional but not obligatory link between microsaccades and neural modulation by covert spatial attention.微扫视与隐蔽空间注意的神经调制之间存在功能而非必需的联系。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 17;13(1):3503. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31217-3.
3
Microsaccades as a marker not a cause for attention-related modulation.微扫视是注意调制的标记而非原因。
颞叶注意力和眼动效应区分了不同类型的时间预期。
J Vis. 2025 Aug 1;25(10):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.10.3.
4
Perturbing human V1 degrades the fidelity of visual working memory.干扰人类初级视觉皮层会降低视觉工作记忆的保真度。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 18;16(1):2675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57882-8.
5
Prioritizing Working Memory Resources Depends on the Prefrontal Cortex.优先分配工作记忆资源取决于前额叶皮层。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 12;45(11):e1552242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1552-24.2025.
6
Adaptation and exogenous attention interact in the early visual cortex: A TMS study.适应与外源性注意力在早期视觉皮层中相互作用:一项经颅磁刺激研究。
iScience. 2024 Oct 11;27(11):111155. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111155. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
7
Role of the Medial Posterior Parietal Cortex in Orchestrating Attention and Reaching.内侧后顶叶皮质在协调注意力和伸手动作中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jan 1;45(1):e0659242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0659-24.2024.
8
Prioritizing working memory resources depends on prefrontal cortex.优先分配工作记忆资源取决于前额叶皮质。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 27:2024.05.11.593696. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.11.593696.
9
Attentional shifts bias microsaccade direction but do not cause new microsaccades.注意力转移会使微扫视方向产生偏差,但不会引发新的微扫视。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Oct 22;2(1):97. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00149-7.
10
Jointly looking to the past and the future in visual working memory.在视觉工作记忆中共同回顾过去和展望未来。
Elife. 2024 May 15;12:RP90874. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90874.
Elife. 2022 Mar 8;11:e74168. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74168.
4
α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception.α 相位-幅度权衡预测视觉感知。
eNeuro. 2022 Feb 22;9(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022. Print 2022 Jan-Feb.
5
Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning.内源性注意和外源性注意对感觉调谐的差异影响。
J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 16;42(7):1316-1327. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0892-21.2021. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
6
State-dependent TMS effects in the visual cortex after visual adaptation: A combined TMS-EEG study.视觉适应后视觉皮层中状态依赖的经颅磁刺激效应:一项联合经颅磁刺激-脑电图研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Feb;134:129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
7
Role of the frontal eye field in human microsaccade responses: A TMS study.额眼区在人类微扫视反应中的作用:TMS 研究。
Biol Psychol. 2021 Oct;165:108202. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108202. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
Cross-dataset reproducibility of human retinotopic maps.跨数据集的人类视网膜地形图的可重复性。
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 1;244:118609. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118609. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
9
An image-computable model of how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception.一种关于内源性注意和外源性注意如何差异化地改变视觉感知的可计算成像模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 17;118(33). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106436118.
10
Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex.内源性和外源性注意对人类视觉皮层活动的影响差异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 4;10(1):21274. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78172-x.