Skrzypek Natalia, Baster Natalia, Perera Ian, Żądło Anna, Stalmach-Przygoda Agata, Szeliga Marta, Cebula Grzegorz
Department of Medical Education, Centre for Innovative Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Folia Med Cracov. 2022 Dec 29;62(4):91-97. doi: 10.24425/fmc.2022.144086.
At the Department of Medical Education, Centre for Innovative Medical Education at Jagiellonian University Medical College, a completely remote OSCE (e-OSCE) was con- ducted for the first time using the Microsoft Teams platform. 255 test takers were tasked with presenting their communication and clinical skills in order to assess clinical reasoning. A i m: Analysis of the assessment of the OSCE adaptation to the requirements of the COVID-19 pandemic at the Department of Medical Educations in the form of the e-OSCE from the students' perspective. M e t h o d s: Discussion of the OSCE modification was carried out among 6th-year medical students and graduates undergoing validation of their foreign medical degrees. In order to assess students' opinions of the e-OSCE, we used questionnaires. The Statistica 12.0 program was used to analyse the results. R e s u l t s: According to 91.57% of respondents, the e-OSCE was well-prepared. 60% of students strongly agree and 29.47% rather agree that the order of the stations was appropriate and clear. A majority of respondents rated the e-OSCE as fair. 66.32% of respondents strongly agree and rather agree that the proportions of communication and clinical skills were appropriate. The vast majority of the participants of the exam (81.05%) had enough time for individual stations. A statistically significant (p <0.0001) correlation was found between the type of classes and preparation for the e-OSCE. For 61.05% of respondents, the Laboratory Training of Clinical Skills course was the best preparation for students taking the e-OSCE. Taking into account the stressfulness of the OSCE, only 15.96% of students found the online form more stressful than the traditional (in-person) exam. C o n c l u s i o n s: The e-OSCE in students' opinions was well-organized. Informing test-takers prior to the e-OSCE about the role of invigilators assessing individual stations should be improved. The e-OSCE has been proven to be suitable for assessing a wide range of material and validating communication and clinical skills in appropriate proportions. The e-OSCE is fair according to examinees' opinion. The study proves that even in a pandemic, it is possible to prepare an online exam without exposing examiners and examinees to the dangers posed by COVID-19.
在雅盖隆大学医学院创新医学教育中心医学教育系,首次使用微软团队平台进行了完全远程的客观结构化临床考试(e-OSCE)。255名考生被要求展示他们的沟通和临床技能,以便评估临床推理能力。目的:从学生的角度分析以e-OSCE形式对医学教育系客观结构化临床考试适应COVID-19大流行要求的评估。方法:在六年级医学生和正在进行外国医学学位认证的毕业生中开展了关于客观结构化临床考试修改的讨论。为了评估学生对e-OSCE的看法,我们使用了问卷。使用Statistica 12.0程序分析结果。结果:91.57%的受访者认为e-OSCE准备充分。60%的学生强烈同意,29.47%的学生比较同意各考站的顺序合适且清晰。大多数受访者认为e-OSCE是公平的。66.32%的受访者强烈同意或比较同意沟通和临床技能的比例合适。绝大多数考试参与者(81.05%)在各个考站有足够的时间。在课程类型和e-OSCE准备之间发现了具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)的相关性。对于61.05%的受访者来说,临床技能实验室培训课程是参加e-OSCE学生的最佳准备。考虑到客观结构化临床考试的压力程度,只有15.96%的学生认为在线形式比传统(面对面)考试压力更大。结论:学生认为e-OSCE组织良好。应改进在e-OSCE之前告知考生监考人员评估各个考站的作用。事实证明,e-OSCE适用于评估广泛的内容,并以适当比例验证沟通和临床技能。根据考生的意见,e-OSCE是公平的。该研究证明,即使在大流行期间,也可以准备在线考试而不使考官和考生面临COVID-19带来的危险。