Suppr超能文献

在一项横断面研究中,探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间现场客观结构化临床考试的观点、益处和挑战。

Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Tübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tubingen Department of Internal Medicine, Tubingen, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 3;12(6):e058845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058845.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic mandated fundamental changes to student evaluations, including the administration of the observed structured clinical examination (OSCE). This study aims to conduct an in-person OSCE to verify students' practical skills under necessary infection control practices and the impact of face masks on student-patient interactions.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design.

SETTING

The OSCE at Medical School of Tuebingen takes place in October 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 149 students (third year of study) completed the survey (RR=80.1%). It was their first OSCE.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measure was how this type of OSCE was evaluated by participating students in regard to preparation, content and difficulty as well as in real life. Secondary outcome measures were how the implemented hygiene actions influenced the OSCE, including the interaction and communication between students and standardised patients (SPs). Items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1=completely to 6=not at all). Means, SDs, frequencies and percentages were calculated.

RESULTS

149 students, 32 SPs and 59 examiners participated. The students rated the OSCE with 2.37 (±0.52) for preparation and 2.07 (±0.32) for content. They perceived the interaction to be significantly disrupted by the use of face masks (3.03±1.54) (p<0.001) compared with the SPs (3.84±1.44) and the examiners (4.14±1.55). In general, the three groups considered the use of face masking the OSCE to be helpful (1.60±1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

An in-person OSCE, even in the midst of a global pandemic, is feasible and acceptable to both students and faculty. When compared the students' results to previous students' results who completed the OSCE before the pandemic, the results indicated that students felt less prepared than under non-pandemic circumstances; however, their performances on this OSCE were not lower.

摘要

目的

由于 COVID-19 大流行的限制,学生评估发生了根本性的变化,包括实施客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。本研究旨在在必要的感染控制措施下进行面对面的 OSCE,以验证学生的实践技能,并研究口罩对面部交流的影响。

设计

横断面设计。

地点

图宾根医学院的 OSCE 于 2020 年 10 月进行。

参与者

共有 149 名学生(三年级)完成了调查(RR=80.1%)。这是他们第一次参加 OSCE。

主要和次要结果测量

主要结果是参与学生如何评价这种类型的 OSCE,包括准备情况、内容和难度,以及在现实生活中的应用。次要结果是实施的卫生措施如何影响 OSCE,包括学生和标准化患者(SP)之间的互动和沟通。项目评分采用 6 分制(1=完全,6=完全不)。计算平均值、标准差、频率和百分比。

结果

共有 149 名学生、32 名 SP 和 59 名考官参加了 OSCE。学生对 OSCE 的准备情况评价为 2.37(±0.52),内容评价为 2.07(±0.32)。他们认为口罩的使用严重干扰了互动(3.03±1.54)(p<0.001),与 SP(3.84±1.44)和考官(4.14±1.55)相比。总的来说,三组人都认为在 OSCE 中使用口罩是有帮助的(1.60±1.15)。

结论

即使在全球大流行期间,面对面的 OSCE 也是可行且可以被学生和教师接受的。将学生的结果与大流行前完成 OSCE 的学生的结果进行比较,结果表明,学生感觉准备不足,不如非大流行时期;然而,他们在这次 OSCE 中的表现并不低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d1/9170794/387a0c44a7a4/bmjopen-2021-058845f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验