Suppr超能文献

“我们不是道德警察”:临床伦理学家的专业化与医疗决策的监管

"We are not the ethics police": The professionalization of clinical ethicists and the regulation of medical decision-making.

作者信息

Schupmann Will

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2023 Apr;322:115808. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115808. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

Clinical ethicists represent a growing profession in U.S. healthcare. This profession's aspirations include serving as a supportive resource to hospital staff, but also as an ethics "watchdog," ensuring that medical decision-making adheres to ethical standards. Drawing on 31 in-depth interviews conducted in 2021 of clinical ethicists working across the U.S., I evaluate the extent to which these watchdog aspirations have been achieved. I investigate ethicists' success in leveraging three strategies aspiring professions have used to secure their jurisdictional claims: acquiring professional expertise, securing administrative authority, and cultivating trusting relationships. I show that ethicists face barriers to leveraging each, which has consequences for how ethical dilemmas are resolved. Findings point to challenges aspiring professions must overcome in order to claim jurisdictions posing a threat to incumbent professions; the tensions that exist between legal risk management and clinical ethics; and the organizational strategies marginal actors leverage to advance their interests and influence the delivery of healthcare.

摘要

临床伦理学家在美国医疗保健领域是一个不断发展的职业。这个职业的目标包括为医院工作人员提供支持性资源,同时也充当伦理“监督者”,确保医疗决策符合伦理标准。基于2021年对美国各地临床伦理学家进行的31次深度访谈,我评估了这些监督目标的实现程度。我调查了伦理学家在运用有抱负的职业为确保其管辖权主张而采用的三种策略方面的成功情况:获得专业专长、确保行政权力以及建立信任关系。我表明,伦理学家在运用每一种策略时都面临障碍,这对伦理困境的解决方式产生了影响。研究结果指出了有抱负的职业为了声称对现有职业构成威胁的管辖权必须克服的挑战;法律风险管理与临床伦理之间存在的紧张关系;以及边缘行为者为推进自身利益和影响医疗保健服务而采用的组织策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验