Suppr超能文献

招募和留住欧洲医疗荒漠地区的全科医生:系统评价。

Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in European medical deserts: a systematic review.

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands

Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain; and Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain; and Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Spain

出版信息

Rural Remote Health. 2023 Feb;23(1):7477. doi: 10.22605/RRH7477. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite policies aiming at universal health coverage by ensuring availability and accessibility of general practitioners (GPs), medically underserved areas are still present in Europe. This systematic review aims to summarize and compare literature on interventions and their potential effectiveness of GP recruitment and retention in these underserved areas ('medical deserts') from 2011 onwards.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were used to identify publications, applying a two-stage selection process. All types of study designs, published in the past 10 years, were included if they discussed a possible intervention for GP recruitment or retention covering an underserved area in an EU-27/EEA/EFTA country (part of the European Union, the European Economic Area or the European Free Trade Association). Exclusion criteria were abstracts or full text not available, conference abstracts, poster presentations, books or overlapping secondary literature. Identified interventions were classified into four categories: 'education', 'professional and personal support', 'financial incentives' and 'regulation'. Eligible articles were critically appraisal by two authors (JB, LF), independently, by using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 294 publications initially retrieved, 25 publications were included. Of them, 14 (56%) described educational interventions, 13 (52%) professional and personal support, and 11 (40%) financial or regulatory interventions. Overlapping categories were often described (56%). The effectiveness of educational or supportive interventions has mainly been evaluated cross-sectionally, whereby causal inference on future GP availability cannot be implied. Few and mixed results were found for the effectiveness of financial and regulatory interventions, because period co-interventions were not taken into account during the study.

CONCLUSION

In the past 10 years, educational and supportive interventions to improve GP recruitment and retention have been reported most frequently, but often overlapping strategies are seen. While multiple strategies have potential to be effective, their limited evaluation makes it difficult to provide suggestions for policymakers to adapt their GP recruitment and retention strategies aiming at a best-practice approach in European medical deserts.

摘要

简介

尽管政策旨在通过确保全科医生(GP)的可及性和可及性来实现全民健康覆盖,但在欧洲仍然存在医疗服务不足的地区。本系统评价旨在总结和比较 2011 年以来关于这些服务不足地区(“医疗荒漠”)的 GP 招聘和保留的干预措施及其潜在效果的文献。

方法

使用 PubMed 和 Embase 来识别出版物,应用两阶段选择过程。如果讨论了涵盖欧盟 27/EEA/EFTA 国家(欧盟、欧洲经济区或欧洲自由贸易联盟的一部分)服务不足地区的 GP 招聘或保留的可能干预措施,则纳入所有类型的研究设计,并在过去 10 年内发表。排除标准为不可用的摘要或全文、会议摘要、海报展示、书籍或重叠的二次文献。确定的干预措施分为四类:“教育”、“专业和个人支持”、“经济激励”和“监管”。两名作者(JB、LF)独立使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所清单对合格文章进行批判性评估。

结果

最初检索到的 294 篇出版物中,有 25 篇被纳入。其中,14 篇(56%)描述了教育干预措施,13 篇(52%)描述了专业和个人支持,11 篇(40%)描述了经济或监管干预措施。经常描述重叠的类别(56%)。教育或支持性干预措施的有效性主要是通过横断面评估的,因此不能推断未来 GP 可用性的因果关系。很少有混合结果发现经济和监管干预措施的有效性,因为在研究期间没有考虑同期干预措施。

结论

在过去 10 年中,为提高 GP 招聘和保留率而报告的教育和支持性干预措施最为频繁,但经常出现重叠策略。虽然多种策略具有潜在的有效性,但由于对其进行的评估有限,因此难以向政策制定者提供建议,以使其 GP 招聘和保留策略适应欧洲医疗荒漠中的最佳实践方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验