Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Australia.
Poche SA & NT, Flinders Northern Territory, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Australia.
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Aug 26;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00643-7.
Attracting and retaining sufficient health workers to provide adequate services for residents of rural and remote areas has global significance. High income countries (HICs) face challenges in staffing rural areas, which are often perceived by health workers as less attractive workplaces. The objective of this review was to examine the quantifiable associations between interventions to retain health workers in rural and remote areas of HICs, and workforce retention.
The review considers studies of rural or remote health workers in HICs where participants have experienced interventions, support measures or incentive programs intended to increase retention. Experimental, quasi-experimental and observational study designs including cohort, case-control, cross-sectional and case series studies published since 2010 were eligible for inclusion. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for reviews of risk and aetiology was used. Databases searched included MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, Web of Science and Informit.
Of 2649 identified articles, 34 were included, with a total of 58,188 participants. All study designs were observational, limiting certainty of findings. Evidence relating to the retention of non-medical health professionals was scant. There is growing evidence that preferential selection of students who grew up in a rural area is associated with increased rural retention. Undertaking substantial lengths of rural training during basic university training or during post-graduate training were each associated with higher rural retention, as was supporting existing rural health professionals to extend their skills or upgrade their qualifications. Regulatory interventions requiring return-of-service (ROS) in a rural area in exchange for visa waivers, access to professional licenses or provider numbers were associated with comparatively low rural retention, especially once the ROS period was complete. Rural retention was higher if ROS was in exchange for loan repayments.
Educational interventions such as preferential selection of rural students and distributed training in rural areas are associated with increased rural retention of health professionals. Strongly coercive interventions are associated with comparatively lower rural retention than interventions that involve less coercion. Policy makers seeking rural retention in the medium and longer term would be prudent to strengthen rural training pathways and limit the use of strongly coercive interventions.
吸引和留住足够数量的卫生工作者,为农村和偏远地区的居民提供充分的服务,这在全球范围内具有重要意义。高收入国家(HICs)在为农村地区配备人员方面面临挑战,农村地区往往被卫生工作者视为吸引力较低的工作场所。本研究旨在探讨 HIC 农村和偏远地区留住卫生工作者的干预措施与劳动力保留之间的定量关联。
本研究考虑了 HIC 农村或偏远地区卫生工作者的研究,这些研究的参与者经历了旨在增加保留率的干预、支持措施或激励计划。纳入的研究设计包括实验、准实验和观察性研究,包括队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面研究和病例系列研究,这些研究均于 2010 年后发表。采用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的风险和病因学审查方法。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE(OVID)、CINAHL(EBSCO)、Embase、Web of Science 和 Informit。
在 2649 篇已确定的文章中,有 34 篇被纳入,共有 58188 名参与者。所有研究设计均为观察性研究,这限制了研究结果的确定性。关于非医疗保健专业人员保留的证据很少。越来越多的证据表明,优先选择在农村地区长大的学生与增加农村保留率有关。在基础大学培训或研究生培训期间进行大量农村培训,以及支持现有农村卫生专业人员扩展技能或升级资格,均与较高的农村保留率相关。要求在农村地区服务(ROS)以换取签证豁免、获得专业执照或提供号码的监管干预措施与农村保留率相对较低相关,尤其是在 ROS 期结束后。如果 ROS 是为了偿还贷款,那么农村保留率会更高。
教育干预措施,如优先选择农村学生和在农村地区开展分布式培训,与卫生专业人员的农村保留率增加有关。与涉及较少强制力的干预措施相比,具有较强强制性的干预措施与农村保留率较低相关。政策制定者若希望在中短期内实现农村保留,就应加强农村培训途径,并限制使用具有较强强制性的干预措施。