Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK
Samaritans, Ewell, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e065456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065456.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been much concern and speculation about rises in suicide rates, despite evidence that suicides did not in fact increase in the first year of the pandemic in most countries with real-time suicide data. This public narrative is potentially harmful, as well as misleading, and is likely to be perpetuated by sensational news coverage.
Using a bespoke database, we analysed the quality and content of print and online UK news (including opinion pieces) on the impact of COVID-19 on suicidality, based on adherence to international recommendations. χ tests were conducted to examine variability in relation to key characteristics (eg, type of publication) and to four 'restriction phases' (based on UK government official lockdown measures) over the first 14 months of the pandemic.
We identified 372 stories about COVID-19 and suicidality in online and print news between the first UK lockdown (March 2020) and May 2021 (when restrictions were significantly eased in the UK). Throughout this period, over a third of articles (39.2%) and headlines (41.4%) claimed or predicted a rise in suicide, often attributed to feelings of entrapment and poor mental health (especially among young people) and fueled by expert commentary and speculation. Almost a third of reports were rated as being of negative quality (116, 31.2%), and at least half included no signposting to help and support. However, reporting improved in phases of less stringent COVID-19 restrictions and over time, with later articles and headlines including fewer negative statements and predictions about rises in suicides, and greater reliance on academic evidence.
As the longer-term consequences of the pandemic develop, and other national and global events unfold, it is increasingly important that the media, and the wider community of experts shaping its narratives, strive for a positive and evidence-informed approach to news coverage of suicide.
自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来,尽管有证据表明在大多数拥有实时自杀数据的国家中,大流行的第一年自杀率实际上并未上升,但人们仍非常关注和猜测自杀率上升的问题。这种公众说法可能具有危害性和误导性,而且很可能会被耸人听闻的新闻报道所延续。
我们使用定制数据库,根据国际建议,分析了英国关于 COVID-19 对自杀意念影响的印刷和在线新闻(包括观点文章)的质量和内容,这些新闻基于对英国 2020 年 3 月(首次封锁)至 2021 年 5 月(英国限制措施显著放宽)期间的在线和印刷新闻中有关 COVID-19 和自杀的 372 个故事。进行 χ 检验,以检验与关键特征(例如,出版物类型)以及大流行的头 14 个月中的四个“限制阶段”(基于英国政府的官方封锁措施)有关的变异性。
在此期间,超过三分之一的文章(39.2%)和标题(41.4%)声称或预测自杀率上升,通常归因于被困感和心理健康状况不佳(尤其是在年轻人中),并受到专家评论和猜测的推动。几乎有三分之一的报道被评为质量较差(116 篇,占 31.2%),并且至少有一半的报道没有提供有关帮助和支持的信息。但是,随着 COVID-19 限制放宽和时间的推移,报告有所改善,后期的文章和标题中包含的自杀率上升的负面陈述和预测减少,并且更多地依赖于学术证据。
随着大流行的长期后果的发展以及其他国家和全球事件的展开,媒体以及塑造其报道的更广泛的专家社区越来越需要努力以积极和基于证据的方式报道自杀新闻。