• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测社交媒体文本中对自杀的负面态度:预测模型的开发和验证研究。

Predicting negative attitudes towards suicide in social media texts: prediction model development and validation study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 8;12:1401322. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401322. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401322
PMID:39040862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11260716/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementing machine learning prediction of negative attitudes towards suicide may improve health outcomes. However, in previous studies, varied forms of negative attitudes were not adequately considered, and developed models lacked rigorous external validation. By analyzing a large-scale social media dataset (Sina Weibo), this paper aims to fully cover varied forms of negative attitudes and develop a classification model for predicting negative attitudes as a whole, and then to externally validate its performance on population and individual levels.

METHODS

938,866 Weibo posts with relevant keywords were downloaded, including 737,849 posts updated between 2009 and 2014 (), and 201,017 posts updated between 2015 and 2020 (). (1) For model development, based on 10,000 randomly selected posts from , a human-based content analysis was performed to manually determine labels of each post (non-negative or negative attitudes). Then, a computer-based content analysis was conducted to automatically extract psycholinguistic features from each of the same 10,000 posts. Finally, a classification model for predicting negative attitudes was developed on selected features. (2) For model validation, on the population level, the developed model was implemented on remaining 727,849 posts from , and was externally validated by comparing proportions of negative attitudes between predicted and human-coded results. Besides, on the individual level, similar analyses were performed on 300 randomly selected posts from , and the developed model was externally validated by comparing labels of each post between predicted and actual results.

RESULTS

For model development, the F1 and area under ROC curve (AUC) values reached 0.93 and 0.97. For model validation, on the population level, significant differences but very small effect sizes were observed for the whole sample (  = 32.35,  < 0.001; Cramer's V = 0.007,  < 0.001), men (  = 9.48,  = 0.002; Cramer's V = 0.005,  = 0.002), and women (  = 25.34,  < 0.001; Cramer's V = 0.009,  < 0.001). Besides, on the individual level, the F1 and AUC values reached 0.76 and 0.74.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the efficiency and necessity of machine learning prediction of negative attitudes as a whole, and confirms that external validation is essential before implementing prediction models into practice.

摘要

背景

实施机器学习预测对自杀的消极态度可能会改善健康结果。然而,在之前的研究中,不同形式的消极态度没有得到充分考虑,而且开发的模型缺乏严格的外部验证。通过分析大规模的社交媒体数据集(新浪微博),本文旨在充分涵盖不同形式的消极态度,并开发一种整体预测消极态度的分类模型,然后在人群和个体水平上对其性能进行外部验证。

方法

下载了 938866 条包含相关关键词的微博帖子,其中 737849 条帖子更新于 2009 年至 2014 年(),201017 条帖子更新于 2015 年至 2020 年()。(1)为了进行模型开发,我们从随机选择的 10000 个帖子中,基于人工的内容分析手动确定每个帖子的标签(非消极或消极态度)。然后,我们基于计算机的内容分析从相同的 10000 个帖子中自动提取心理语言特征。最后,我们在选定的特征上开发了一种预测消极态度的分类模型。(2)为了进行模型验证,在人群水平上,我们将开发的模型应用于剩余的 727849 个来自的帖子,并通过比较预测结果和人工编码结果之间的消极态度比例来进行外部验证。此外,在个体水平上,我们对来自的 300 个随机选择的帖子进行了类似的分析,并通过比较预测结果和实际结果之间的每个帖子的标签来进行外部验证。

结果

对于模型开发,F1 和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)值分别达到 0.93 和 0.97。对于模型验证,在人群水平上,对于整个样本(  = 32.35, < 0.001;Cramer's V = 0.007, < 0.001)、男性(  = 9.48, = 0.002;Cramer's V = 0.005, = 0.002)和女性(  = 25.34, < 0.001;Cramer's V = 0.009, < 0.001),都观察到了显著差异,但效应量很小。此外,在个体水平上,F1 和 AUC 值分别达到 0.76 和 0.74。

结论

本研究证明了整体预测消极态度的机器学习的效率和必要性,并证实了在将预测模型应用于实践之前,外部验证是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300f/11260716/b2427b8b07f9/fpubh-12-1401322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300f/11260716/b2427b8b07f9/fpubh-12-1401322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300f/11260716/b2427b8b07f9/fpubh-12-1401322-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting negative attitudes towards suicide in social media texts: prediction model development and validation study.预测社交媒体文本中对自杀的负面态度:预测模型的开发和验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 8;12:1401322. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401322. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing Suicide Risk and Emotional Distress in Chinese Social Media: A Text Mining and Machine Learning Study.评估中国社交媒体中的自杀风险和情绪困扰:一项文本挖掘与机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 10;19(7):e243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7276.
3
Stigmatizing Attitudes Across Cybersuicides and Offline Suicides: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo.对网络自杀和线下自杀的污名化态度:新浪微博的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 8;24(4):e36489. doi: 10.2196/36489.
4
Mind the gap: Exploring differences in suicide literacy between cybersuicide and offline suicide.注意差距:探索网络自杀与线下自杀之间自杀知识差异。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;10:1061590. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1061590. eCollection 2022.
5
Attitudes towards suicide attempts broadcast on social media: an exploratory study of Chinese microblogs.社交媒体上对自杀未遂事件的态度:一项关于中国微博的探索性研究。
PeerJ. 2015 Sep 8;3:e1209. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1209. eCollection 2015.
6
Public Attitudes Toward Anxiety Disorder on Sina Weibo: Content Analysis.公众对新浪微博上焦虑障碍的态度:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 4;25:e45777. doi: 10.2196/45777.
7
Public Discourse and Sentiment Toward Dementia on Chinese Social Media: Machine Learning Analysis of Weibo Posts.中文社交媒体中公众对痴呆症的话语和情绪:微博帖子的机器学习分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 2;24(9):e39805. doi: 10.2196/39805.
8
Detecting Potentially Harmful and Protective Suicide-Related Content on Twitter: Machine Learning Approach.在 Twitter 上检测潜在有害和保护自杀相关内容:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 17;24(8):e34705. doi: 10.2196/34705.
9
Natural Language Processing for Depression Prediction on Sina Weibo: Method Study and Analysis.基于新浪微博的抑郁预测的自然语言处理方法研究与分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 4;11:e58259. doi: 10.2196/58259.
10
Detecting depression stigma on social media: A linguistic analysis.社交媒体上的抑郁污名检测:一项语言分析。
J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:358-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.087. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Public Attitudes Toward Anxiety Disorder on Sina Weibo: Content Analysis.公众对新浪微博上焦虑障碍的态度:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 4;25:e45777. doi: 10.2196/45777.
2
Media coverage and speculation about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide: a content analysis of UK news.媒体对 COVID-19 大流行对自杀影响的报道和猜测:对英国新闻的内容分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e065456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065456.
3
Prospective associations of text-message-based sentiment with symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety.
基于短信的情绪与抑郁、广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑症状的前瞻性关联。
Depress Anxiety. 2022 Dec;39(12):794-804. doi: 10.1002/da.23286. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
Media coverage of Canadian Veterans, with a focus on post traumatic stress disorder and suicide.媒体对加拿大退伍军人的报道,重点关注创伤后应激障碍和自杀问题。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 May 16;22(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03954-8.
5
Stigmatizing Attitudes Across Cybersuicides and Offline Suicides: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo.对网络自杀和线下自杀的污名化态度:新浪微博的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 8;24(4):e36489. doi: 10.2196/36489.
6
Health Education in the Healthy China Initiative 2019-2030.《健康中国行动(2019—2030年)》中的健康教育
China CDC Wkly. 2021 Jan 22;3(4):78-80. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.018.
7
Understanding Communication in an Online Cancer Forum: Content Analysis Study.理解在线癌症论坛中的交流:内容分析研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 7;7(3):e29555. doi: 10.2196/29555.
8
Suicide literacy and suicide stigma - results of a population survey from Germany.自杀素养和自杀污名化——来自德国的一项人口调查结果。
J Ment Health. 2022 Aug;31(4):517-523. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1875421. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
Attitudes towards suicide and risk factors for suicide attempts among university students in South Korea.韩国大学生的自杀态度和自杀企图的危险因素。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jul 1;272:166-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.135. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
A Qualitative Analysis of Self-Harm and Suicide in Sri Lankan Printed Newspapers.斯里兰卡印刷报纸中自我伤害和自杀的定性分析。
Crisis. 2021 Jan;42(1):56-63. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000687. Epub 2020 May 5.