• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于行政数据识别小儿阑尾炎的延迟诊断:一项多中心回顾性验证研究。

Identification of delayed diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis in administrative data: a multicentre retrospective validation study.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e064852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064852.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064852
PMID:36854600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9980351/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To derive and validate a tool that retrospectively identifies delayed diagnosis of appendicitis in administrative data with high accuracy.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Five paediatric emergency departments (EDs).

PARTICIPANTS

669 patients under 21 years old with possible delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, defined as two ED encounters within 7 days, the second with appendicitis.

OUTCOME

Delayed diagnosis was defined as appendicitis being present but not diagnosed at the first ED encounter based on standardised record review. The cohort was split into derivation (2/3) and validation (1/3) groups. We derived a prediction rule using logistic regression, with covariates including variables obtainable only from administrative data. The resulting trigger tool was applied to the validation group to determine area under the curve (AUC). Test characteristics were determined at two predicted probability thresholds.

RESULTS

Delayed diagnosis occurred in 471 (70.4%) patients. The tool had an AUC of 0.892 (95% CI 0.858 to 0.925) in the derivation group and 0.859 (95% CI 0.806 to 0.912) in the validation group. The positive predictive value (PPV) for delay at a maximal accuracy threshold was 84.7% (95% CI 78.2% to 89.8%) and identified 87.3% of delayed cases. The PPV at a stricter threshold was 94.9% (95% CI 87.4% to 98.6%) and identified 46.8% of delayed cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This tool accurately identified delayed diagnosis of appendicitis. It may be used to screen for potential missed diagnoses or to specifically identify a cohort of children with delayed diagnosis.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种能从行政数据中准确识别阑尾炎延迟诊断的工具。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

五个儿科急诊部门。

参与者

669 名 21 岁以下疑似阑尾炎延迟诊断的患者,定义为在 7 天内两次急诊就诊,第二次就诊时确诊为阑尾炎。

结果

延迟诊断是指根据标准病历回顾,首次就诊时存在阑尾炎但未被诊断。队列被分为推导(2/3)和验证(1/3)组。我们使用逻辑回归推导预测规则,协变量包括只能从行政数据中获得的变量。将所得触发工具应用于验证组,以确定曲线下面积(AUC)。在两个预测概率阈值下确定测试特征。

结论

该工具能准确识别阑尾炎的延迟诊断。它可以用于筛选潜在的漏诊病例,或专门识别有延迟诊断的患儿队列。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e127/9980351/758e2c71648b/bmjopen-2022-064852f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e127/9980351/758e2c71648b/bmjopen-2022-064852f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e127/9980351/758e2c71648b/bmjopen-2022-064852f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of delayed diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis in administrative data: a multicentre retrospective validation study.基于行政数据识别小儿阑尾炎的延迟诊断:一项多中心回顾性验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e064852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064852.
2
Community Validation of an Approach to Detect Delayed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Big Databases.基于大数据的阑尾炎延迟诊断检测方法的社区验证。
Hosp Pediatr. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):e170-e174. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007204.
3
Accuracy of automated identification of delayed diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis and sepsis in the ED.ED 中自动识别小儿阑尾炎和脓毒症延迟诊断的准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Dec;36(12):736-740. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208841. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
4
Clinical Features and Preventability of Delayed Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis.小儿阑尾炎延迟诊断的临床特征和可预防因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22248.
5
Emergency Department Volume and Delayed Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科就诊量与小儿阑尾炎延迟诊断:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):833-838. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005972. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
6
Factors Associated With Potentially Missed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in the Emergency Department.与急诊科潜在阑尾炎漏诊相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200612. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0612.
7
Clinician factors associated with delayed diagnosis of appendicitis.与阑尾炎延迟诊断相关的临床医生因素。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2022 Dec 12;10(2):183-186. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0119. eCollection 2023 May 1.
8
Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department.加拿大儿科急诊科小儿阑尾炎评分的前瞻性验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):591-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00445.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
9
Delayed diagnosis of serious paediatric conditions in 13 regional emergency departments.13 个地区急诊部严重儿科疾病的延迟诊断。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Apr 24;33(5):293-300. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015314.
10
Multicenter evaluation of a method to identify delayed diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis and sepsis in administrative data.多中心评估一种在行政数据中识别糖尿病酮症酸中毒和脓毒症延迟诊断的方法。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Jun 22;10(4):383-389. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0019. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Pediatric Diagnostic Quality Measurement in All United States Hospitals.美国所有医院开展儿科诊断质量测量的可行性
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.07.035.
2
Characterizing Inequities in Pediatric Appendicitis Delayed Diagnosis and Perforation.小儿阑尾炎延迟诊断与穿孔中的不平等现象特征分析
J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2024 Mar 16;11:200108. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2024.200108. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Disparities in Diagnostic Timeliness and Outcomes of Pediatric Appendicitis.小儿阑尾炎诊断及时性和治疗结果的差异

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Suspected Appendicitis: A Comparative Analysis of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis in Children.疑似阑尾炎的诊断准确性:儿童误诊阑尾炎的对比分析。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e690-e696. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002323.
2
The Diagnostic Error Index: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Identify and Measure Diagnostic Errors.诊断错误指数:一项旨在识别和衡量诊断错误的质量改进举措。
J Pediatr. 2021 May;232:257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.11.065. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
3
Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353667. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53667.
4
Emergency Department Volume and Delayed Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科就诊量与小儿阑尾炎延迟诊断:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):833-838. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005972. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
5
Multicenter evaluation of a method to identify delayed diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis and sepsis in administrative data.多中心评估一种在行政数据中识别糖尿病酮症酸中毒和脓毒症延迟诊断的方法。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Jun 22;10(4):383-389. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0019. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.
6
Community Validation of an Approach to Detect Delayed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Big Databases.基于大数据的阑尾炎延迟诊断检测方法的社区验证。
Hosp Pediatr. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):e170-e174. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007204.
识别触发概念,以筛选因诊断错误而就诊的急诊科患者。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Nov 13;8(3):340-346. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0122. Print 2021 Aug 26.
4
Development of a rubric for assessing delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, diabetic ketoacidosis and sepsis.制定用于评估阑尾炎、糖尿病酮症酸中毒和脓毒症延迟诊断的评分表。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Jun 26;8(2):219-225. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0035. Print 2021 May 26.
5
Trends in Capability of Hospitals to Provide Definitive Acute Care for Children: 2008 to 2016.医院提供儿童急性治疗能力的趋势:2008 年至 2016 年。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2203.
6
The High Value of Blurry Data in Improving Pediatric Emergency Care.
Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Dec;9(12):1007-1009. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0200. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Accuracy of automated identification of delayed diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis and sepsis in the ED.ED 中自动识别小儿阑尾炎和脓毒症延迟诊断的准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Dec;36(12):736-740. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208841. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety.关于使用修订后的更安全诊断工具来帮助衡量和提高诊断安全性的建议。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Nov 26;6(4):315-323. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0012.
9
Timing and Location of Emergency Department Revisits.急诊科复诊的时间和地点。
Pediatrics. 2018 May;141(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4087. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.《STARD 2015诊断准确性研究报告指南:解释与详述》
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.