Suppr超能文献

通用脓疱性银屑病医师总体评估(GPPGA)和通用脓疱性银屑病面积和严重程度指数(GPPASI)的心理测量验证。

Psychometric validation of the generalized pustular psoriasis physician global assessment (GPPGA) and generalized pustular psoriasis area and severity index (GPPASI).

机构信息

School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Innovaderm Research Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Jul;37(7):1327-1335. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18999. Epub 2023 Mar 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and life-threatening skin disease often accompanied by systemic inflammation. There are currently no standardized or validated GPP-specific measures for assessing severity.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability, validity and responder definitions of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) and Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI).

METHODS

The GPPGA and GPPASI were validated using outcome data from Week 1 of the Effisayil™ 1 study. The psychometric analyses performed included confirmatory factor analysis, item-to-item/item-to-total correlations, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, known-groups validity, responsiveness analysis and responder definition analysis.

RESULTS

Using data from this patient cohort (N = 53), confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated unidimensionality of the GPPGA total score (root mean square error of approximation <0.08), and GPPGA item-to-item and item-to-total correlations ranged from 0.58 to 0.90. The GPPGA total score, pustulation subscore and GPPASI total score all demonstrated good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.70, 0.91 and 0.95 respectively), and good evidence of convergent validity. In anchor-based analyses, all three scores were able to detect changes in symptom and disease severity over time; reductions of -1.4, -2.2 and - 12.0 were suggested as clinically meaningful improvement thresholds for the GPPGA total score, GPPGA pustulation subscore and GPPASI total score respectively. Anchor-based analyses also supported the GPPASI 50 as a clinically meaningful threshold for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our findings indicate that the GPPGA and GPPASI are valid, reliable and responsive measures for the assessment of GPP disease severity, and support their use in informing clinical endpoints in trials in GPP.

摘要

背景

泛发性脓疱型银屑病(GPP)是一种罕见且危及生命的皮肤病,常伴有全身炎症。目前尚无用于评估严重程度的标准化或经过验证的 GPP 特异性措施。

目的

评估广义脓疱型银屑病医生整体评估(GPPGA)和广义脓疱型银屑病面积和严重程度指数(GPPASI)的可靠性、有效性和应答者定义。

方法

使用 Effisayil™1 研究第 1 周的结局数据对 GPPGA 和 GPPASI 进行了验证。进行的心理测量学分析包括验证性因子分析、项目间/项目总和相关性、内部一致性信度、重测信度、收敛效度、已知组有效性、反应性分析和应答者定义分析。

结果

使用该患者队列(N=53)的数据,验证性因子分析表明 GPPGA 总分具有一维性(均方根误差逼近值<0.08),GPPGA 项目间和项目总和相关性范围为 0.58 至 0.90。GPPGA 总分、脓疱亚分和 GPPASI 总分均表现出良好的重测信度(组内相关系数分别为 0.70、0.91 和 0.95),并且具有良好的收敛效度证据。在基于锚点的分析中,所有三个评分都能够检测到症状和疾病严重程度随时间的变化;分别提出了 -1.4、-2.2 和-12.0 的减少作为 GPPGA 总分、GPPGA 脓疱亚分和 GPPASI 总分的临床有意义改善阈值。基于锚点的分析还支持 GPPASI 50 作为改善的临床有意义阈值。

结论

总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,GPPGA 和 GPPASI 是评估 GPP 疾病严重程度的有效、可靠和敏感的措施,并支持将其用于为 GPP 试验中的临床终点提供信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验