• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机应用程序自助治疗社交焦虑障碍患者的评价:一项随机对照研究-SMASH。

Evaluation of a smartphone application for self-help for patients with social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled study-SMASH.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Goethe-Universitaet Frankfurt, Varrentrappstr. 40-42, 60486, Frankfurt, Germany.

Institute for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universitaet Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Mar 1;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07168-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07168-5
PMID:36855058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9974392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) is as effective as a stand-alone treatment and helps facilitating access to treatment. Given the complexity of the treatment, we argue that the effect of ICBT could be even greater if guided by a therapist, as this could increase treatment adherence. We modified an established and well-evaluated treatment approach and developed a mobile application for treating social anxiety disorder (SAD). In the present study, we compare the efficacy of app use alone (APP) with video-based, therapist-guided app use (TG-APP) and with a wait-list control group (WLC) in terms of symptom reduction, and various secondary outcomes such as increase in quality of life or decrease of general psychological distress.

METHODS/DESIGN: A within-between interaction design with randomization to one of three conditions will be used. In the APP condition, patients receive only the app without any additional contact with therapists, while in the TG-APP condition, therapists provide 8 sessions of video-based treatment in addition to using the app. The study will be conducted in two university outpatient treatment centers with reliably diagnosed SAD patients. The primary outcome will be defined as change in SAD symptoms, as measured by the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (expert rating). Furthermore, a wide range of self-reports and clinician ratings for other symptoms (depression, general psychopathology) or quality of life will be used. A simulation-based power analysis for a 3 × 2 interaction effect (group × time) on the primary outcome in a linear mixed model resulted in a total sample size of N = 165.

DISCUSSION

The present study will be one of the first to examine the additional benefit of therapist-guided video sessions regarding the use of an app treating SAD. Study results are pivotal to future treatment application in SAD.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,基于互联网的认知行为疗法(ICBT)与独立治疗一样有效,并有助于促进治疗的可及性。鉴于治疗的复杂性,如果由治疗师指导,ICBT 的效果可能会更大,因为这可以提高治疗的依从性。我们修改了一种已建立且经过良好评估的治疗方法,并为治疗社交焦虑症(SAD)开发了一款移动应用程序。在本研究中,我们比较了仅使用应用程序(APP)、基于视频的治疗师指导应用程序(TG-APP)和等待名单对照组(WLC)在症状减轻方面的疗效,以及生活质量提高或一般心理困扰减轻等各种次要结果。

方法/设计:采用随机分组的三向交互设计。在 APP 条件下,患者仅接收应用程序,而不与治疗师进行任何额外的接触,而在 TG-APP 条件下,治疗师在使用应用程序的同时提供 8 次基于视频的治疗。该研究将在两个具有可靠诊断的 SAD 患者的大学门诊治疗中心进行。主要结局将定义为 SAD 症状的变化,通过 Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表(专家评定)测量。此外,还将使用广泛的自我报告和临床医生评定,用于其他症状(抑郁、一般精神病理学)或生活质量。基于模拟的线性混合模型中主要结局的 3×2 交互效应(组×时间)的功效分析得出,总样本量 N = 165。

讨论

本研究将是第一个检查治疗师指导的视频会议对使用治疗 SAD 的应用程序的额外益处的研究之一。研究结果对于 SAD 的未来治疗应用至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79ae/9976400/88f4d58f4ed3/13063_2023_7168_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79ae/9976400/e4e5882296be/13063_2023_7168_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79ae/9976400/88f4d58f4ed3/13063_2023_7168_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79ae/9976400/e4e5882296be/13063_2023_7168_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79ae/9976400/88f4d58f4ed3/13063_2023_7168_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a smartphone application for self-help for patients with social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled study-SMASH.智能手机应用程序自助治疗社交焦虑障碍患者的评价:一项随机对照研究-SMASH。
Trials. 2023 Mar 1;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07168-5.
2
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Hong Kong.基于互联网的认知行为疗法和虚拟现实暴露疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍:香港一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 14;12:e48437. doi: 10.2196/48437.
3
A mobile app for social anxiety disorder: A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and PC-based guided self-help interventions.用于社交焦虑障碍的移动应用程序:比较移动和基于 PC 的引导自助干预的三臂随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Jun;86(6):493-504. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000301.
4
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.互联网提供的针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的认知行为疗法:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1-199. eCollection 2019.
5
Therapist-Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Internet-Delivered Supportive Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.治疗师指导的互联网认知行为疗法与互联网支持性疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍儿童和青少年的随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):705-713. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0469.
6
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an unguided, internet-based self-help intervention for social anxiety disorder in university students: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.一项针对大学生社交焦虑障碍的无指导、基于互联网的自助干预措施的疗效和成本效益的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2125-4.
7
A sorrow shared is a sorrow halved? A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing internet-based clinician-guided individual versus group treatment for social anxiety disorder.一个人的忧愁若与人分担,就会减半?一项三臂随机对照试验比较了基于互联网的临床医生指导的个体与团体治疗社交焦虑障碍的效果。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Sep;84:14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
8
Efficacy of Behavioral Experiments in Cognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.行为实验在认知疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3905-3.
9
Therapist experience and knowledge acquisition in internet-delivered CBT for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial.互联网 delivered CBT 治疗社交焦虑障碍中治疗师的经验和知识获取:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037411. Epub 2012 May 23.
10
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a new instrument to measure social pain.一种用于测量社会疼痛的新工具的开发与验证。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87351-3.
2
Live psychotherapy by video versus in-person: A meta-analysis of efficacy and its relationship to types and targets of treatment.视频心理治疗与面对面心理治疗的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析及其与治疗类型和目标的关系。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 Nov;28(6):1535-1549. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2594. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
The efficacy of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于互联网的认知行为疗法对社交焦虑障碍的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 May;28(3):656-668. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2528. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Dropout rates in clinical trials of smartphone apps for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.智能手机应用程序治疗抑郁症状的临床试验中的脱落率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.167. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Clinical validity and intrarater and test-retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 - Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV).DSM-5 临床定式访谈 - 临床版(SCID-5-CV)的临床有效性以及评定者内信度和重测信度。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;73(12):754-760. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12931. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
A short screening tool for borderline personality disorder (Short-Bord): Validated by Rasch analysis.用于边缘型人格障碍的简短筛查工具(Short-Bord):经 Rasch 分析验证。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Aug;44:195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
A mobile app for social anxiety disorder: A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and PC-based guided self-help interventions.用于社交焦虑障碍的移动应用程序:比较移动和基于 PC 的引导自助干预的三臂随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Jun;86(6):493-504. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000301.
8
Evaluating a Web-Based Social Anxiety Intervention Among University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.评估一项针对大学生的基于网络的社交焦虑干预措施:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 21;20(3):e91. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8630.
9
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS): Optimal cut points for remission and response in a German sample.利博维茨社交焦虑量表 (LSAS):德国样本中缓解和反应的最佳切点。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 May;25(3):465-473. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2179. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
10
Reference-based sensitivity analysis via multiple imputation for longitudinal trials with protocol deviation.基于参考的敏感性分析:通过多重填补法对存在方案偏离的纵向试验进行分析
Stata J. 2016 Apr;16(2):443-463.