Suppr超能文献

评估近期基于双重态-双重态激发的含时双杂化密度泛函

Assessing Recent Time-Dependent Double-Hybrid Density Functionals on Doublet-Doublet Excitations.

作者信息

Van Dijk Joshua, Casanova-Páez Marcos, Goerigk Lars

机构信息

School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm Platz 1, 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.

出版信息

ACS Phys Chem Au. 2022 May 17;2(5):407-416. doi: 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00014. eCollection 2022 Sep 28.

Abstract

This work is the first thorough investigation of time-dependent double-hybrid density functionals (DHDFs) for the calculation of doublet-doublet excitation energies. It sheds light on the current state-of-the-art techniques in the field and clarifies if there is still room for future improvements. Overall, 29 hybrid functionals and DHDFs are investigated. We separately analyze the individual impacts of the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA), range separation, and spin-component/opposite scaling (SCS/SOS) on 45 doublet-doublet excitations in 23 radicals before concluding with an overarching analysis that includes and excludes challenging excitations with double-excitation or multireference character. Our results show again that so-called "nonempirical" DHDFs are outperformed by semiempirical ones. While the best assessed functionals are DHDFs, some of the worst are also DHDFs and outperformed by all assessed hybrids. SCS/SOS is particularly beneficial for range-separated DHDFs. Spin-scaled, range-separated DHDFs paired with the TDA belong to the best tested methods here, and we particularly highlight SCS-ωB2GP-PLYP, SOS-ωB2PLYP, SOS-ωB2GP-PLYP, SOS-ωB88PP86, SOS-RSX-QIDH, and SOS-ωPBEPP86. When comparing our functional rankings with previous studies on singlet-singlet and singlet-triplet excitations, we recommend TDA-SOS-ωB88PP86 and TDA-SOS-ωPBEPP86 as robust methods for excitation energies in general until further improvements have been achieved that surpass the chemical accuracy threshold for challenging open-shell excitations without increasing the computational effort.

摘要

这项工作是对用于计算双电子-双电子激发能的含时双杂化密度泛函(DHDFs)的首次全面研究。它揭示了该领域当前的先进技术,并阐明了未来是否仍有改进空间。总体而言,研究了29种杂化泛函和DHDFs。在对包括和排除具有双激发或多参考特征的挑战性激发进行总体分析之前,我们分别分析了Tamm-Dancoff近似(TDA)、范围分离以及自旋分量/相反缩放(SCS/SOS)对23个自由基中45个双电子-双电子激发的各自影响。我们的结果再次表明,所谓的“非经验”DHDFs比半经验的要差。虽然评估最好的泛函是DHDFs,但一些最差的也是DHDFs,并且比所有评估的杂化泛函都差。SCS/SOS对范围分离的DHDFs特别有益。与TDA配对的自旋缩放、范围分离的DHDFs属于这里测试最好的方法,我们特别强调SCS-ωB2GP-PLYP、SOS-ωB2PLYP,、SOS-ωB2GP-PLYP、SOS-ωB88PP86、SOS-RSX-QIDH和SOS-ωPBEPP86。在将我们的泛函排名与先前关于单重态-单重态和单重态-三重态激发的研究进行比较时,我们建议TDA-SOS-ωB88PP86和TDA-SOS-ωPBEPP86作为一般激发能的稳健方法,直到在不增加计算量的情况下实现超越挑战性开壳激发的化学精度阈值的进一步改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/991e/9955292/f6d8ded8a198/pg2c00014_0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验