Hancock Amy C, Goerigk Lars
School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne Parkville Australia
RSC Adv. 2022 May 3;12(21):13014-13034. doi: 10.1039/d2ra01703b. eCollection 2022 Apr 28.
Excimers are supramolecular systems whose binding strength is influenced by many factors that are ongoing challenges for computational methods, such as charge transfer, exciton coupling, and London dispersion interactions. Treating the various intricacies of excimer binding at an adequate level is expected to be particularly challenging for Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (TD-DFT) methods. In addition to well-known limitations for some TD-DFT methods in the description of charge transfer or exciton coupling, the inherent London dispersion problem from ground-state DFT translates to TD-DFT. While techniques to appropriately treat dispersion in DFT are well-developed for electronic ground states, these dispersion corrections remain largely untested for excited states. Herein, we aim to shed light on current TD-DFT methods, including some of the newest developments. The binding of four model excimers is studied across nine density functionals with and without the application of additive dispersion corrections against a wave function reference of SCS-CC2/CBS(3,4) quality, which approximates select CCSDR(3)/CBS data adequately. To our knowledge, this is the first study that presents single-reference wave function dissociation curves at the complete basis set level for the assessed model systems. It is also the first time range-separated double-hybrid density functionals are applied to excimers. In fact, those functionals turn out to be the most promising for the description of excimer binding followed by global double hybrids. Range-separated and global hybrids-particularly with large fractions of Fock exchange-are outperformed by double hybrids and yield worse dissociation energies and inter-molecular equilibrium distances. The deviation between each assessed functional and reference increases with system size, most likely due to missing dispersion interactions. Additive dispersion corrections of the DFT-D3(BJ) and DFT-D4 types reduce the average errors for TD-DFT methods but do so inconsistently and therefore do not offer a black-box solution in their ground-state parametrised form. The lack of appropriate description of dispersion effects for TD-DFT methods is likely hindering the practical application of the herein identified more efficient methods. Dispersion corrections parametrised for excited states appear to be an important next step to improve the applicability of TD-DFT methods and we hope that our work assists with the future development of such corrections.
准分子是超分子体系,其结合强度受许多因素影响,这些因素对计算方法来说仍是挑战,比如电荷转移、激子耦合和伦敦色散相互作用。在适当水平处理准分子结合的各种复杂情况,对于含时密度泛函理论(TD-DFT)方法而言预计极具挑战性。除了一些TD-DFT方法在描述电荷转移或激子耦合方面存在众所周知的局限性外,基态DFT固有的伦敦色散问题也会转化到TD-DFT中。虽然在电子基态中,适当处理DFT中色散的技术已得到充分发展,但这些色散校正对于激发态在很大程度上仍未得到检验。在此,我们旨在阐明当前的TD-DFT方法,包括一些最新进展。研究了四种模型准分子在九种密度泛函下的结合情况,有或没有应用加性色散校正,以SCS-CC2/CBS(3,4)质量的波函数作为参考,该参考能充分近似选定的CCSDR(3)/CBS数据。据我们所知,这是第一项在完整基组水平上给出评估模型体系的单参考波函数解离曲线的研究。这也是首次将范围分离双杂化密度泛函应用于准分子。事实上,这些泛函对于描述准分子结合最具前景,其次是全局双杂化泛函。范围分离和全局杂化泛函——特别是具有较大福克交换分数的——在双杂化泛函面前表现不佳,给出的解离能和分子间平衡距离更差。每个评估泛函与参考之间的偏差随体系大小增加,很可能是由于缺少色散相互作用。DFT-D3(BJ)和DFT-D4类型的加性色散校正降低了TD-DFT方法的平均误差,但并不一致,因此在其基态参数化形式下并不能提供一个通用解决方案。TD-DFT方法缺乏对色散效应的适当描述,可能阻碍了本文所确定的更高效方法的实际应用。为激发态参数化的色散校正似乎是提高TD-DFT方法适用性的重要下一步,我们希望我们的工作有助于此类校正的未来发展。