Suppr超能文献

分娩时毒物学检测对围产期大麻使用的作用有限。

Limited Utility of Toxicology Testing at Delivery for Perinatal Cannabis Use.

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Hosp Pediatr. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):317-325. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006897.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of individuals undergoing toxicology testing at delivery for a sole indication of cannabis use and to evaluate the rate of unexpected positive toxicology testing results among this cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included dyads with a maternal history of cannabis use who underwent peripartum toxicology testing between 2016 and 2020 at 5 birthing hospitals in Massachusetts. We collected information on maternal demographic characteristics and toxicology test results and reviewed records of dyads with unexpected positive results to identify additional social risk factors and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 60 608 live births reviewed, 1924 dyads underwent toxicology testing, including 614 (31.9%) for a sole indication of cannabis use. Significantly greater percentages of patients in the cannabis cohort were <25 years old (32.4% vs 6.1% of the birthing population, P <.001), non-Hispanic Black (32.4% vs 8.1%, P < .001), Hispanic or Latino (30.5% vs 15.5%), American Indian/Alaskan (0.7% vs 0.1%), and publicly insured (39.9% vs 15.6%, P <.001). Eight of the 614 dyads (1.3%) had an unexpected positive toxicology test result, including 2 (0.3%) unexpectedly positive for opioids. Seven dyads (1.1%) had false positive test results for unexpected substances. Only 1 test result changed clinical management; a urine test positive for opioids prompted monitoring (but not medication) for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Toxicology testing of patients for a sole indication of cannabis use, without other risk factors, may be of limited utility in elucidating other substance use and may exacerbate existing disparities in perinatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

描述仅因大麻使用而接受毒理学检测的个体的特征,并评估该队列中意外阳性毒理学检测结果的发生率。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了在马萨诸塞州的 5 家分娩医院于 2016 年至 2020 年间进行围产期毒理学检测的、有大麻使用史的母婴对。我们收集了产妇人口统计学特征和毒理学检测结果的信息,并查阅了意外阳性结果母婴对的记录,以确定其他社会风险因素和临床结局。

结果

在回顾的 60608 例活产儿中,有 1924 对母婴接受了毒理学检测,其中 614 对(31.9%)仅因大麻使用而进行检测。在大麻组中,年龄<25 岁的患者比例明显更高(32.4%比分娩人群的 6.1%,P<0.001)、非西班牙裔黑人(32.4%比 8.1%,P<0.001)、西班牙裔或拉丁裔(30.5%比 15.5%)、美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(0.7%比 0.1%)和公保(39.9%比 15.6%,P<0.001)。614 对母婴对中有 8 对(1.3%)的毒理学检测结果意外阳性,其中 2 对(0.3%)意外检出阿片类药物阳性。有 7 对母婴对(1.1%)的意外物质检测结果为假阳性。只有 1 例检测结果改变了临床管理;尿液检测阿片类药物阳性促使对新生儿阿片类戒断综合征进行监测(而非药物治疗)。

结论

仅因大麻使用而进行毒理学检测,而无其他风险因素,可能对阐明其他物质使用情况的作用有限,并可能加剧围产期结局方面已存在的差异。

相似文献

2
Assessing the clinical utility of toxicology testing in the peripartum period.评估围产期毒物学检测的临床实用性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100963. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100963. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

3
Test or Talk: Empiric Bias and Epistemic Injustice.测试还是交流:经验性偏见与认知不公
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 1;140(2):150-152. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004884. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验