Suppr超能文献

麻醉住院医师中霸凌现象调查(BARS):一份经过验证的问卷能否增进我们对澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉住院医师中霸凌现象的理解?

The Bullying in Anaesthesia Registrars Survey (BARS): Does a validated questionnaire improve our understanding of bullying in Australian and New Zealand anaesthesia trainees?

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.

School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2023 May;51(3):199-206. doi: 10.1177/0310057X221138584. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Abstract

Previous studies have established that bullying is a pervasive problem in healthcare. However, most investigations of bullying in anaesthesia use self-labelled survey questions in which respondents' subjective perceptions of bullying are central in defining prevalence. This study applied the validated revised Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-r) for a more objective assessment of bullying prevalence and types of negative behaviours experienced by anaesthesia trainees in Australia and New Zealand.An online questionnaire was distributed by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) Clinical Trials Network to 990 randomly selected ANZCA trainees. Bullying prevalence was assessed using both a self-labelled survey tool and the NAQ-r, which requires respondents to select from a list of negative acts, with validated cut-offs that define bullying. Sources of bullying, impact on recipients and barriers to reporting were also examined. This design allowed comparison of the two methods for evaluating bullying prevalence.Twenty-six percent of trainees surveyed completed both bullying survey instruments. Thirty percent of these respondents self-labelled as having experienced bullying in the previous six months, with 8% reporting bullying at least monthly. With the NAQ-r, most respondents (96%) reported experiencing at least one negative act in the prior six months, with 54% reporting these on a monthly basis. The most frequent behaviours described were humiliation and intimidation. Using NAQ-r cut-offs, 36% of respondents experienced occasional bullying and 10% were victims of severe workplace bullying.The NAQ-r provides a more nuanced and objective insight into bullying faced by ANZCA trainees than do self-labelled surveys. The results of the present study provide a valuable baseline for ongoing assessment.

摘要

先前的研究已经证实,欺凌在医疗保健领域是一个普遍存在的问题。然而,大多数关于麻醉学中欺凌行为的调查都使用自我标记的调查问卷,其中受访者对欺凌的主观感知是定义流行率的核心。本研究应用了经过验证的修订后的负面行为问卷(NAQ-r),对澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师培训生中欺凌的流行率和经历的负面行为类型进行了更客观的评估。澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师学院(ANZCA)临床试验网络通过在线问卷向 990 名随机选择的 ANZCA 培训生进行了调查。使用自我标记的调查工具和 NAQ-r 评估了欺凌的流行率,后者要求受访者从负面行为列表中进行选择,并且有验证过的定义欺凌的界限。还检查了欺凌的来源、对接受者的影响和报告障碍。这种设计允许比较两种方法来评估欺凌的流行率。接受调查的培训生中有 26%完成了两项欺凌调查工具。其中 30%的受访者自我标记为在过去六个月中经历过欺凌,8%的人报告每月至少经历一次欺凌。根据 NAQ-r,大多数受访者(96%)报告在过去六个月中至少经历过一次负面行为,其中 54%的人每月都会报告这些行为。描述最多的行为是羞辱和恐吓。使用 NAQ-r 的界限,36%的受访者偶尔经历欺凌,10%的受访者是严重工作场所欺凌的受害者。NAQ-r 比自我标记的调查更细致和客观地提供了 ANZCA 培训生所面临的欺凌情况的洞察。本研究的结果为持续评估提供了有价值的基线。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验