Suppr超能文献

氨甲环酸皮内注射与富血小板血浆治疗黄褐斑的疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。

Intradermal injection of tranexamic acid versus platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of melasma: a split-face comparative study.

机构信息

Dermatology, Venereology and Andrology Department, Itay Elbaroud General Hospital, Albehira, Egypt.

Dermatology, Venereology and Andrology Department, Damietta Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Aug;315(6):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02580-y. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Abstract

Millions of people throughout the world suffer from the acquired condition of hyperpigmentation known as melasma. Melasma is characterized by symmetrically oriented hyperpigmented macules and patches. Many treatment options are available with variable degrees of efficacy and tolerability. The aim of the work was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of intradermal tranexamic acid (TXA) versus intradermal platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of various types of melasma. The current split-face prospective study included 40 cases with melasma. Tranexamic acid (TXA) was injected intradermally into the right side of the face by using a concentration of 4 mg/ml, while platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was injected intradermally into the left side. In both sides, a total of three sessions of treatment were provided, once every 4 weeks. Digital photographs were taken before each treatment session and 3 months after the last session. The modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) grading system and dermoscopy were used to assess the improvement in the condition. The disease severity and percentage of improvement were assessed by mMASI score before and after therapy across both sides of the face. along with determining the degree of satisfaction and side effects among the included cases. The mean mMASI score before therapy in the TXA side was 4.59 ± 2.87, while in the PRP side, the mean mMASI score before therapy was 4.72 ± 2.72 with no statistically significant difference between the two sides (p = 0.841). After 3 months of treatment, the mean mMASI score in the TXA-treated side was 2.49 ± 1.58 with a mean percentage of decrease of 45.67 ± 8.10%, while in the PRP side, the mean mMASI score after treatment was 2.17 ± 1.41 with a mean percentage of decrease of 53.66 ± 11.27%. There was a high statistically significant decrease in the mMASI score after treatment on both sides (p < 0.001); however, the percentage of score reduction in the PRP side compared to the TXA side was statistically higher. Intradermal injection with PRP revealed higher efficacy in the treatment of melasma as compared to TXA injection with no significant difference regarding the associated side effects.

摘要

全世界数以百万计的人患有后天性色素沉着过度症,即黄褐斑。黄褐斑的特征是对称性的色素沉着斑和斑块。有许多治疗方法可供选择,其疗效和耐受性也有所不同。本研究旨在评估和比较真皮内氨甲环酸(TXA)与真皮内富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗各种类型黄褐斑的疗效和安全性。这项前瞻性、半脸对照研究共纳入 40 例黄褐斑患者。将 TXA(浓度为 4mg/ml)以皮内注射的方式注入右侧面部,而 PRP 则以皮内注射的方式注入左侧面部。在两侧,每 4 周治疗一次,共进行三次。每次治疗前和最后一次治疗后 3 个月拍摄数码照片。采用改良黄褐斑面积严重程度指数(mMASI)分级系统和共聚焦显微镜评估病情改善情况。通过治疗前后两侧的 mMASI 评分评估疾病严重程度和改善百分比,并确定纳入病例的满意度和不良反应程度。TXA 侧治疗前平均 mMASI 评分为 4.59±2.87,PRP 侧治疗前平均 mMASI 评分为 4.72±2.72,两侧无统计学差异(p=0.841)。治疗 3 个月后,TXA 治疗侧平均 mMASI 评分为 2.49±1.58,平均下降率为 45.67±8.10%,PRP 治疗侧平均 mMASI 评分为 2.17±1.41,平均下降率为 53.66±11.27%。两侧 mMASI 评分在治疗后均有统计学显著下降(p<0.001);但 PRP 侧评分下降率明显高于 TXA 侧。与 TXA 注射相比,PRP 皮内注射治疗黄褐斑的疗效更高,且不良反应无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff76/10338558/5fe1df69781e/403_2023_2580_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验