Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, South Korea.
Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, South Korea.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Aug;26(4):425-432. doi: 10.1177/1591019919899755. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
Acute ischemic strokes caused by steno-occlusive lesion of the cervical internal carotid artery are associated with poor clinical outcome. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of emergent carotid artery stenting for the management of these lesions. We compared the clinical outcomes regarding the intracranial lesion, namely tandem occlusions versus isolated cervical internal carotid artery occlusion.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent carotid artery stenting for cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion between 2011 and 2018. After dividing the patients into two groups according to the presence or absence of intracranial lesions (tandem group and isolated cervical group), we analyzed demographic data, angiographic findings, and clinical outcomes. A modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 was defined as a favorable clinical outcome.
Of 75 patients, 46 patients (61.3%) had tandem lesions, and the remaining 29 had only cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion. Successful stenting was performed in all patients with favorable clinical outcomes (64.0%). Successful reperfusion score (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2 b) was 84.0%; tandem group (76.1%) versus isolated cervical group (96.6%) of cases. Mean modified Rankin Scale score at 90-days was 2.09. The rate of favorable clinical outcome showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( = 0.454).
Endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion is a technically feasible and clinically effective intervention regardless of intracranial occlusion. Therefore, we recommend endovascular treatment regardless of the presence of concomitant intracranial artery occlusion for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion.
由颈内动脉狭窄-闭塞性病变引起的急性缺血性脑卒中与不良临床预后相关。我们评估了紧急颈动脉支架置入术治疗这些病变的临床疗效。我们比较了颅内病变(串联闭塞与孤立性颈内动脉闭塞)患者的临床结局。
我们回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2018 年期间因颈内动脉狭窄-闭塞性病变而行颈动脉支架置入术的急性缺血性脑卒中患者。根据颅内病变的存在与否(串联组和孤立性颈内动脉组)将患者分为两组,然后分析了人口统计学数据、血管造影表现和临床结局。改良 Rankin 量表评分≤2 定义为良好的临床结局。
75 例患者中,46 例(61.3%)存在串联病变,其余 29 例仅存在颈内动脉狭窄-闭塞性病变。所有患者均成功进行了支架置入术,且临床结局良好(64.0%)。成功再灌注评分(脑梗死溶栓 ≥2 b)为 84.0%;串联组(76.1%)与孤立性颈内动脉组(96.6%)。90 天的平均改良 Rankin 量表评分为 2.09。两组之间的良好临床结局率无统计学差异( = 0.454)。
对于颈内动脉狭窄-闭塞性病变引起的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,血管内治疗是一种技术上可行且具有临床疗效的干预措施,与颅内闭塞无关。因此,我们建议对于颈内动脉狭窄-闭塞性病变引起的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,无论是否伴有颅内动脉闭塞,都应进行血管内治疗。