Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Oct;21(11):2797-2806.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.02.011. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Socioeconomic determinants of health are understudied in early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma. We aimed to assess how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma.
We performed an observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 database. A total of 1526 patients from 2004 to 2015 with a primary T1aN0M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma were subdivided into 3 socioeconomic tertiles based on their median household income. Endoscopic trends over time, rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment, 2- and 5-year overall survival, cancer-specific mortality, and non-cancer-specific mortality were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using R-studio.
Patients within the lowest median household income tertile ($20,000-$54,390) were associated with higher cancer-specific mortality at 2 years (P < .01) and 5 years (P < .02), and lower overall survival at 2 and 5 years (P < .01) compared with patients in higher income tertiles. Patients with a higher income had a decreased hazard ratio for cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99) in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Patients within the higher income tertile were more likely to receive endoscopic intervention (P < .001), which was associated with improved cancer-specific mortality compared with patients who received primary surgical intervention (P = .001). The South had lower rates of endoscopy compared with other regions.
Lower median household income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of endoscopic resection in T1aN0M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying and rectifying possible etiologies for these socioeconomic and geographic disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes in early esophageal cancer.
健康的社会经济决定因素在早期食管腺癌中研究较少。我们旨在评估社会经济地位如何影响 T1a 食管腺癌患者的初始治疗决策和生存结果。
我们使用 2018 年提交的监测、流行病学和最终结果-18 数据库进行了一项观察性研究。根据中位家庭收入,将 2004 年至 2015 年的 1526 例原发性 T1aN0M0 食管腺癌患者分为 3 个社会经济三分位组。计算内镜治疗趋势随时间的变化、内镜和手术治疗率、2 年和 5 年总生存率、癌症特异性死亡率和非癌症特异性死亡率。使用 R-studio 进行统计分析。
中位家庭收入最低的三分位组($20,000-$54,390)患者的 2 年(P <.01)和 5 年(P <.02)癌症特异性死亡率更高,2 年和 5 年总生存率更低(P <.01)与高收入三分位组的患者相比。在多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型中,收入较高的患者癌症特异性死亡率的危险比降低(危险比,0.66;95%CI,0.45-0.99)。收入较高的三分位组患者更有可能接受内镜治疗(P <.001),与接受主要手术干预的患者相比,这与癌症特异性死亡率的改善相关(P =.001)。与其他地区相比,南部地区的内镜检查率较低。
较低的中位家庭收入与 T1aN0M0 食管腺癌中更高的癌症特异性死亡率和更低的内镜切除术率相关。针对这些社会经济和地理差异的潜在病因制定基于人群的策略对于改善早期食管癌患者的预后至关重要。