Suppr超能文献

超软单头、三头和T形牙刷去除牙菌斑效果及使用者主观感受的比较

Comparison of the plaque-removal efficacy of ultra-soft single-headed, triple-headed, and T-shaped toothbrushes and the subjective perceptions of users.

作者信息

Wu Ju-Hui, Li Jhen-Yi, Du Je-Kang, Lee Chen-Yi

机构信息

Department of Oral Hygiene, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University.

Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.

出版信息

J Oral Sci. 2023 Mar 30;65(2):102-106. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.22-0307. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the plaque-removal efficacy of ultra-soft single-headed, triple-headed, and T-shaped toothbrushes and the subjective perceptions of users.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, crossover study, 30 healthy adult participants were randomly divided into three groups of 10, who tested the three types of toothbrushes in differing order, with a 1-week washout period between the tests. Dental plaque scores were recorded before and after toothbrushing, and questionnaires on subjective perceptions after toothbrushing were collected.

RESULTS

The participants included 16 female participants and 14 male participants (average age: 29.4 ± 6.7 years). All three toothbrush types were effective in reducing dental plaque by 36-46%; however, the cleaning effect of the ultra-soft single-headed toothbrush was inferior to that of the triple-headed and T-shaped toothbrushes, the difference being statistically significant. The users' subjective perceptions suggested that the ultra-soft single-headed toothbrush was significantly superior to the other two toothbrush types. Plaque scores for the lower posterior tooth surfaces were higher than those for the upper posterior tooth surfaces, particularly on the left side, for both the ultra-soft single-headed and T-shaped toothbrushes.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare practitioners should identify the type of toothbrush bristles used by individuals and provide appropriate oral health information.

摘要

目的

比较超软单头、三头和T形牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果以及使用者的主观感受。

方法

在这项随机、单盲、交叉研究中,30名健康成年参与者被随机分为三组,每组10人,他们以不同顺序测试这三种类型的牙刷,测试之间有1周的洗脱期。记录刷牙前后的牙菌斑评分,并收集刷牙后主观感受的问卷。

结果

参与者包括16名女性和14名男性(平均年龄:29.4±6.7岁)。所有三种类型的牙刷在减少牙菌斑方面都有效,牙菌斑减少了36%-46%;然而,超软单头牙刷的清洁效果不如三头和T形牙刷,差异具有统计学意义。使用者的主观感受表明,超软单头牙刷明显优于其他两种类型的牙刷。对于超软单头和T形牙刷,下后牙表面的牙菌斑评分高于上后牙表面,尤其是左侧。

结论

医疗保健从业者应确定个人使用的牙刷刷毛类型,并提供适当的口腔健康信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验