Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 1A7, Canada.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Feb;153(2):1108. doi: 10.1121/10.0017170.
Listeners parse the speech signal effortlessly into words and phrases, but many questions remain about how. One classic idea is that rhythm-related auditory principles play a role, in particular, that a psycho-acoustic "iambic-trochaic law" (ITL) ensures that alternating sounds varying in intensity are perceived as recurrent binary groups with initial prominence (trochees), while alternating sounds varying in duration are perceived as binary groups with final prominence (iambs). We test the hypothesis that the ITL is in fact an indirect consequence of the parsing of speech along two in-principle orthogonal dimensions: prominence and grouping. Results from several perception experiments show that the two dimensions, prominence and grouping, are each reliably cued by both intensity and duration, while foot type is not associated with consistent cues. The ITL emerges only when one manipulates either intensity or duration in an extreme way. Overall, the results suggest that foot perception is derivative of the cognitively more basic decisions of grouping and prominence, and the notions of trochee and iamb may not play any direct role in speech parsing. A task manipulation furthermore gives new insight into how these decisions mutually inform each other.
听众毫不费力地将语音信号解析成语词,但关于其具体机制仍有许多未解之谜。有一种经典观点认为,与节奏相关的听觉原则在其中发挥了作用,特别是心理声学的“抑扬格-扬抑格定律”(ITL)确保了强度交替的声音被感知为具有初始重音(扬抑格)的周期性二元组,而时长交替的声音则被感知为具有最终重音(抑扬格)的二元组。我们检验了以下假设:ITL 实际上是沿着两个原则上正交的维度(重音和分组)对语音进行切分的间接结果。几项感知实验的结果表明,两个维度(重音和分组)都分别受到强度和时长的可靠提示,而音步类型与一致的提示无关。只有当人们以极端的方式操纵强度或时长时,ITL 才会出现。总的来说,这些结果表明,音步感知是更基本的分组和重音决策的派生,抑扬格和扬抑格的概念可能在语音切分中没有任何直接作用。任务操作还提供了对这些决策如何相互影响的新见解。