Kamal Faisal, Khan Muhammad Ali, Lee-Smith Wade, Sharma Sachit, Acharya Ashu, Farooq Umer, Aziz Muhammad, Kouanda Abdul, Dai Sun-Chuan, Munroe Craig A, Arain Mustafa, Adler Douglas G
Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Endosc Ultrasound. 2023 Jan-Feb;12(1):8-15. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00206.
ERCP is the first line of treatment for malignant biliary obstruction and EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is usually used for patients who have failed ERCP. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been suggested as a rescue treatment for patients who fail EUS-BD and ERCP. In this meta-analysis, we have evaluated the efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD as a rescue treatment of malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP and EUS-BD. We reviewed several databases from inception to August 27, 2021, to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and/or safety of EUS-GBD as a rescue treatment in the management of malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP and EUS-BD. Our outcomes of interest were clinical success, adverse events, technical success, stent dysfunction requiring intervention, and difference in mean pre- and postprocedure bilirubin. We calculated pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. We analyzed data using a random-effects model. We included five studies with 104 patients. Pooled rates (95% CI) of clinical success and adverse events were 85% (76%, 91%) and 13% (7%, 21%). Pooled rate (95% CI) for stent dysfunction requiring intervention was 9% (4%, 21%). The postprocedure mean bilirubin was significantly lower compared to preprocedure bilirubin, SMD (95% CI): -1.12 (-1.62--0.61). EUS-GBD is a safe and effective option to achieve biliary drainage after unsuccessful ERCP and EUS-BD in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是恶性胆管梗阻的一线治疗方法,而超声内镜引导下胆管引流术(EUS-BD)通常用于ERCP治疗失败的患者。超声内镜引导下胆囊引流术(EUS-GBD)已被建议作为EUS-BD和ERCP治疗失败患者的挽救治疗方法。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了EUS-GBD作为ERCP和EUS-BD失败后恶性胆管梗阻挽救治疗的疗效和安全性。我们检索了从数据库建立至2021年8月27日的多个数据库,以确定评估EUS-GBD作为ERCP和EUS-BD失败后恶性胆管梗阻挽救治疗疗效和/或安全性的研究。我们感兴趣的结局指标包括临床成功率、不良事件、技术成功率、需要干预的支架功能障碍以及术前和术后胆红素均值的差异。我们计算分类变量的合并率及95%置信区间(CI),计算连续变量的标准化均值差(SMD)及95%CI。我们使用随机效应模型分析数据。我们纳入了5项研究,共104例患者。临床成功率和不良事件的合并率(95%CI)分别为85%(76%,91%)和13%(7%,21%)。需要干预的支架功能障碍的合并率(95%CI)为9%(4%,21%)。术后胆红素均值显著低于术前胆红素均值,SMD(95%CI):-1.12(-1.62,-0.61)。对于恶性胆管梗阻患者,在ERCP和EUS-BD治疗失败后,EUS-GBD是实现胆管引流的一种安全有效的选择。