Ahmad Anwar, Senaidi Alaya Said
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Architecture, University of Nizwa, PO 33 Postal Code 616, Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(17):48703-48720. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26063-9. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
This review covers the technological measures of a self-sustainable anaerobic up-flow sludge blanket (UASB) system compared with an aerobic activated sludge process (ASP) for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The ASP requires a huge amount of electricity and chemicals and also results in the emission of carbon. The UASB system, instead, is based on greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction and is associated with biogas production for cleaner electricity. WWTPs including the ASP system are not sustainable due to the massive financial power required for clean wastewater. When the ASP system was used, the amount of production was estimated to be 10658.98 tonnes COeq-d of carbon dioxide. Whereas it was 239.19 tonnes COeq-d with the UASB. The UASB system is advantageous over the ASP system as it has a high production of biogas, needs low maintenance, yields a low amount of sludge, and is also a source of electricity that can be used as a power source for the WWTPs. Also, the UASB system produces less biomass, and this helps in reducing costs and maintaining work. Moreover, the aeration tank of the ASP needs 60% of energy distribution; on the other hand, the UASB consumes less energy, approximately 3-11%.
本综述涵盖了用于污水处理厂(WWTPs)的自维持厌氧上流式污泥床(UASB)系统与好氧活性污泥法(ASP)相比的技术措施。ASP需要大量的电力和化学物质,还会导致碳排放。相反,UASB系统基于减少温室气体(GHG)排放,并与生产用于清洁电力的沼气相关联。包括ASP系统在内的污水处理厂由于清洁废水所需的巨大资金投入而不可持续。使用ASP系统时,估计二氧化碳排放量为10658.98吨COeq-d。而使用UASB时为239.19吨COeq-d。UASB系统优于ASP系统,因为它沼气产量高、维护需求低、污泥产量低,并且还是一种可作为污水处理厂电源的电力来源。此外,UASB系统产生的生物质较少,这有助于降低成本和维持运行。而且,ASP的曝气池需要60%的能量分配;另一方面,UASB消耗的能量较少约为3%-11%。