Wakefield Tanner, Bialous Stella, Apollonio Dorie E
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Avenue, Suite 366 Library, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Avenue, Suite 366 Library, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Apr;114:103983. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103983. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
In 2022, despite expanding state-level legalization, cannabis remained illegal at the federal level, driving drug offenses, and contact with the justice system. Cannabis criminalization disproportionately impacts minorities, and criminal records carry negative economic, health, and social consequences. Legalization prevents future criminalization but fails to assist existing record-holders. We surveyed 39 states and Washington DC where cannabis was decriminalized or legalized to determine record expungement availability and accessibility for cannabis offenders.
We performed a retrospective, qualitative survey of state expungement laws allowing record sealing or record destruction where cannabis use was decriminalized or legalized. Statutes were collected between February 25, 2021, and August 25, 2022, from state websites or NexisUni. We collected pardon information for two states from online state government resources. Materials were coded in Atlas.ti to determine if states had general, cannabis, and other drug conviction expungement regimes, petitions, or automated systems, waiting periods, and financial requirements. Codes were developed via inductive and iterative coding of materials.
Among places surveyed, 36 provided any conviction expungement, 34 provided general relief, 21 offered cannabis-specific relief, and 11 offered general drug relief, nonexclusively. Most states used petitions. Thirty-three general and 7 cannabis-specific programs required waiting periods. Nineteen general and 4 cannabis programs imposed administrative fees, and 16 general and one cannabis-specific program required legal financial obligations to be paid.
Among the 39 states and Washington DC that decriminalized or legalized cannabis and offered expungement, more states relied on general rather than cannabis-specific systems, and the majority of these required record holders to petition for relief and imposed waiting periods and financial requirements. Research is needed to determine if automating expungement, reducing or eliminating waiting periods, and eliminating financial requirements may expand record relief for former cannabis offenders.
2022年,尽管州一级的大麻合法化范围不断扩大,但在联邦层面大麻仍然是非法的,这导致了毒品犯罪以及与司法系统的接触。大麻定罪对少数群体的影响尤为严重,犯罪记录会带来负面的经济、健康和社会后果。合法化能够防止未来的定罪,但无法帮助现有的有犯罪记录者。我们对39个州和华盛顿特区进行了调查,这些地方大麻已被非刑罪化或合法化,以确定大麻犯罪者的记录消除的可用性和可及性。
我们对允许封存记录或销毁记录的州消除记录法律进行了回顾性定性调查,这些州大麻使用已被非刑罪化或合法化。法规于2021年2月25日至2022年8月25日期间从州政府网站或律商联讯收集。我们从在线州政府资源中收集了两个州的赦免信息。材料在Atlas.ti中进行编码,以确定各州是否有一般、大麻和其他毒品定罪消除制度、请愿程序或自动化系统、等待期和财务要求。编码是通过对材料进行归纳和迭代编码来制定的。
在接受调查的地方中,36个提供了任何定罪的记录消除,34个提供了一般救济,21个提供了针对大麻的特定救济,11个提供了一般毒品救济(并非排他性的)。大多数州使用请愿程序。33个一般项目和7个针对大麻的特定项目需要等待期。19个一般项目和4个针对大麻的项目收取行政费用,16个一般项目和1个针对大麻的特定项目要求支付法律财务义务。
在39个州和华盛顿特区中,大麻已被非刑罪化或合法化并提供记录消除,更多的州依赖一般系统而非针对大麻的特定系统,并且其中大多数要求有犯罪记录者申请救济,并规定了等待期和财务要求。需要进行研究以确定自动化记录消除、减少或消除等待期以及消除财务要求是否可能扩大对前大麻犯罪者的记录救济。