• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解医疗保健提供者将慢性病负担评估工具付诸实践的观点:一项实施研究方案。

Understanding the healthcare providers' perspective for bringing the assessment of burden of chronic conditions tool to practice: a protocol for an implementation study.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 2;13(3):e068603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068603.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068603
PMID:36863741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9990614/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool is developed and validated to support and facilitate a personalised approach to care for people with chronic conditions. The benefit of using the ABCC-tool greatly depends on how it is implemented. To enable a deeper understanding of when, how and by whom the ABCC-tool is used, this study protocol describes the design of an implementation study in which the context, experiences and implementation process of the ABCC-tool by primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in the Netherlands will be investigated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol describes an implementation study alongside an effectiveness trial, in which the ABCC-tool is evaluated in general practices. The implementation strategy of the tool in the trial confines to providing written information and an instruction video explaining the technical use of the ABCC-tool. The outcomes include a description of: (1) the barriers and facilitators of HCPs for implementation of the ABCC-tool, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and (2) the implementation outcomes guided by the Reach-Effect-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework Carroll's fidelity framework. All outcomes will be gathered through individual semistructured interviews throughout 12 months of use. Interviews will be audiorecorded and transcribed. Transcripts will be analysed using content analysis for identifying barriers and facilitators (based on CFIR) and thematic analyses of HCPs' experiences (based on the RE-AIM and the fidelity frameworks).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The presented study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen (METCZ20180131). Written informed consent is mandatory prior to participation in the study. The results from the study in this protocol will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations.

摘要

简介

评估慢性病负担(ABCC)工具是为支持和促进针对慢性病患者的个性化护理方法而开发和验证的。使用 ABCC 工具的好处在很大程度上取决于它的实施方式。为了更深入地了解 ABCC 工具何时、如何以及由谁使用,本研究方案描述了一项实施研究的设计,该研究将调查荷兰初级保健医疗保健提供者(HCPs)使用 ABCC 工具的背景、经验和实施过程。

方法和分析

本方案描述了一项实施研究,同时进行了一项有效性试验,在该试验中,ABCC 工具在一般实践中进行了评估。试验中该工具的实施策略仅限于提供书面信息和说明如何使用 ABCC 工具的视频。结果包括:(1)根据实施研究综合框架(CFIR)描述 HCP 实施 ABCC 工具的障碍和促进因素,(2)根据 Reach-Effect-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance(RE-AIM)框架卡罗尔的保真度框架描述实施结果。所有结果将通过在 12 个月的使用过程中进行的个人半结构化访谈来收集。访谈将进行录音和转录。使用内容分析识别障碍和促进因素(基于 CFIR)以及对 HCP 经验进行主题分析(基于 RE-AIM 和保真度框架)来分析转录本。

伦理和传播

本研究方案中提出的研究已获得泽兰医院医学伦理委员会(METCZ20180131)的批准。在参与研究之前,必须获得书面知情同意。本方案中研究的结果将通过在同行评议的科学期刊上发表和会议报告来传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9af/9990614/38fdc20be5bd/bmjopen-2022-068603f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9af/9990614/965bb9749531/bmjopen-2022-068603f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9af/9990614/3c616597b10f/bmjopen-2022-068603f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9af/9990614/38fdc20be5bd/bmjopen-2022-068603f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9af/9990614/965bb9749531/bmjopen-2022-068603f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9af/9990614/3c616597b10f/bmjopen-2022-068603f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9af/9990614/38fdc20be5bd/bmjopen-2022-068603f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the healthcare providers' perspective for bringing the assessment of burden of chronic conditions tool to practice: a protocol for an implementation study.了解医疗保健提供者将慢性病负担评估工具付诸实践的观点:一项实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 2;13(3):e068603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068603.
2
Process evaluation of the implementation of the assessment of burden of chronic conditions tool in Dutch primary care - lessons from a qualitative implementation study.评估慢性疾病负担工具在荷兰初级保健中实施的过程评价——一项定性实施研究的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 20;24(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11270-y.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in patients with COPD, asthma, diabetes mellitus type 2 and heart failure: protocol for a pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study.评估慢性疾病负担(ABCC)工具在 COPD、哮喘、2 型糖尿病和心力衰竭患者中的有效性和成本效益:一项实用聚类准实验研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):e037693. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037693.
4
A cluster-randomized study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in South Tyrolean primary care for patients with COPD, asthma, type 2 diabetes, and heart failure: the ABCC South Tyrol study.一项评价在南蒂罗尔初级保健中使用慢性疾病负担评估工具(ABCC)评估 COPD、哮喘、2 型糖尿病和心力衰竭患者的有效性和成本效益的整群随机研究:ABCC 南蒂罗尔研究。
Trials. 2024 Mar 20;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08041-9.
5
Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool in patients with asthma, COPD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure: A pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study in the Netherlands.评估慢性疾病负担(ABCC)工具在哮喘、COPD、2 型糖尿病和心力衰竭患者中的有效性:荷兰一项实用的聚类准实验研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2343364. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2343364. Epub 2024 May 13.
6
Improving continuity of patient care across sectors: study protocol of the process evaluation of a quasi-experimental multi-centre study regarding an admission and discharge model in Germany (VESPEERA).提高跨部门患者护理的连续性:德国一项关于入院和出院模式的准实验性多中心研究(VESPEERA)过程评估的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 12;9(11):e031245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031245.
7
Protocol for the process and feasibility evaluations of a new model of primary care service delivery for managing pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) using a mixed methods approach.采用混合方法评估管理膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和功能的新型初级保健服务提供新模式(PARTNER)的过程和可行性的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 4;10(2):e034526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034526.
8
Early detection and management of major non-communicable diseases in urban primary healthcare facilities in Ethiopia: a study protocol for a type-3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design.埃塞俄比亚城市基层医疗保健设施中主要非传染性疾病的早期发现和管理:一项 3 型混合实施有效性设计的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 4;11(1):e040564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040564.
9
Protocol for the implementation evaluation of an integrated paediatric and primary care model: Strengthening Care for Children (SC4C).《强化儿童照护综合儿科与初级保健模式实施评估方案》:强化儿童照护(SC4C)。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e063450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063450.
10
[The innovation characteristics of person-centred care as perceived by healthcare professionals: an interview study employing a deductive-inductive content analysis guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research.医护人员感知的以患者为中心的护理的创新特征:采用整合实施研究框架指导的演绎归纳内容分析的访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06942-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in primary care in the Netherlands.荷兰初级医疗中慢性病负担评估(ABCC)工具的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e099762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099762.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions tool in Dutch primary care: a context analysis.荷兰初级保健中慢性病负担评估工具实施的障碍与促进因素:一项情境分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e087197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087197.
3
Process evaluation of the implementation of the assessment of burden of chronic conditions tool in Dutch primary care - lessons from a qualitative implementation study.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions Scale in the Netherlands.评估慢性疾病负担量表在荷兰的有效性和可靠性。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):103-111. doi: 10.1370/afm.2954.
2
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in patients with COPD, asthma, diabetes mellitus type 2 and heart failure: protocol for a pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study.
评估慢性疾病负担工具在荷兰初级保健中实施的过程评价——一项定性实施研究的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 20;24(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11270-y.
4
Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool in patients with asthma, COPD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure: A pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study in the Netherlands.评估慢性疾病负担(ABCC)工具在哮喘、COPD、2 型糖尿病和心力衰竭患者中的有效性:荷兰一项实用的聚类准实验研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2343364. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2343364. Epub 2024 May 13.
评估慢性疾病负担(ABCC)工具在 COPD、哮喘、2 型糖尿病和心力衰竭患者中的有效性和成本效益:一项实用聚类准实验研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):e037693. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037693.
4
Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings.采用实施科学方法在常规护理环境中实施和评估患者报告的结果测量(PROM)措施。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3015-3033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
ABC-tool reinvented: development of a disease-specific 'Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool' for multiple chronic conditions.ABC 工具再研发:用于多种慢性病的特定疾病“慢性病负担评估(ABCC)工具”的开发。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 13;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1075-8.
6
Getting a clinical innovation into practice: An introduction to implementation strategies.将临床创新付诸实践:实施策略简介。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112467. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.042. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology.基于描述现象学的质性主题分析。
Nurs Open. 2019 Apr 7;6(3):733-739. doi: 10.1002/nop2.275. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
Setting goals with patients living with multimorbidity: qualitative analysis of general practice consultations.与患有多种疾病的患者一起设定目标:全科医疗咨询的定性分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e479-e488. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704129. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
9
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions.选择实施策略以解决背景障碍:建议的多样性和未来方向。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.
10
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.RE-AIM规划与评估框架:历经20年回顾,适应新科学与实践
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.