• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过人口健康创新和支付改善糖尿病护理:马里兰州西部地区的经验教训。

Improving Diabetes Care Through Population Health Innovations and Payments: Lessons from Western Maryland.

机构信息

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

University of Chicago Section of General Internal Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):48-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07918-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-022-07918-2
PMID:36864271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9980867/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Global budgets might incentivize healthcare systems to develop population health programs to prevent costly hospitalizations. In response to Maryland's all-payer global budget financing system, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Western Maryland developed an outpatient care management center called the Center for Clinical Resources (CCR) to support high-risk patients with chronic disease.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the impact of the CCR on patient-reported, clinical, and resource utilization outcomes for high-risk rural patients with diabetes.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred forty-one adult patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%) and one or more social needs who were enrolled between 2018 and 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Team-based interventions that provided interdisciplinary care coordination (e.g., diabetes care coordinators), social needs support (e.g., food delivery, benefits assistance), and patient education (e.g., nutritional counseling, peer support).

MAIN MEASURES

Patient-reported (e.g., quality of life, self-efficacy), clinical (e.g., HbA1c), and utilization outcomes (e.g., emergency department visits, hospitalizations).

KEY RESULTS

Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly at 12 months, including confidence in self-management, quality of life, and patient experience (56% response rate). No significant demographic differences were detected between patients with or without the 12-month survey response. Baseline mean HbA1c was 10.0% and decreased on average by 1.2 percentage points at 6 months, 1.4 points at 12 months, 1.5 points at 18 months, and 0.9 points at 24 and 30 months (P<0.001 at all timepoints). No significant changes were observed in blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or weight. The annual all-cause hospitalization rate decreased by 11 percentage points (34 to 23%, P=0.01) and diabetes-related emergency department visits also decreased by 11 percentage points (14 to 3%, P=0.002) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CCR participation was associated with improved patient-reported outcomes, glycemic control, and hospital utilization for high-risk patients with diabetes. Payment arrangements like global budgets can support the development and sustainability of innovative diabetes care models.

摘要

背景

全球预算可能会激励医疗系统制定人口健康计划,以预防昂贵的住院治疗。为了应对马里兰州的全民支付全球预算融资系统,匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)西部马里兰州成立了一个名为临床资源中心(CCR)的门诊护理管理中心,为患有慢性病的高危患者提供支持。

目的

评估 CCR 对患有糖尿病的高危农村患者的患者报告、临床和资源利用结果的影响。

设计

观察性队列研究。

参与者

2018 年至 2021 年间入组的 141 名未控制的糖尿病(HbA1c > 7%)且有一个或多个社会需求的成年患者。

干预措施

提供跨学科护理协调(例如,糖尿病护理协调员)、社会需求支持(例如,食品配送、福利援助)和患者教育(例如,营养咨询、同伴支持)的团队干预措施。

主要测量指标

患者报告的结果(例如,生活质量、自我效能感)、临床结果(例如,HbA1c)和利用结果(例如,急诊就诊、住院治疗)。

主要结果

12 个月时患者报告的结果显著改善,包括自我管理信心、生活质量和患者体验(56%的回复率)。在是否有 12 个月调查回复方面,患者之间没有发现显著的人口统计学差异。基线平均 HbA1c 为 10.0%,6 个月时平均降低 1.2 个百分点,12 个月时降低 1.4 个百分点,18 个月时降低 1.5 个百分点,24 个月和 30 个月时降低 0.9 个百分点(所有时间点均 P<0.001)。血压、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇或体重无显著变化。全因住院率下降了 11 个百分点(34%降至 23%,P=0.01),糖尿病相关急诊就诊率也下降了 11 个百分点(14%降至 3%,P=0.002),均发生在 12 个月时。

结论

CCR 的参与与高危糖尿病患者的患者报告结果、血糖控制和住院利用率的改善有关。像全球预算这样的支付安排可以支持创新的糖尿病护理模式的发展和可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3023/10043083/fdd8134e718b/11606_2022_7918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3023/10043083/cb4be7f37936/11606_2022_7918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3023/10043083/fdd8134e718b/11606_2022_7918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3023/10043083/cb4be7f37936/11606_2022_7918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3023/10043083/fdd8134e718b/11606_2022_7918_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Diabetes Care Through Population Health Innovations and Payments: Lessons from Western Maryland.通过人口健康创新和支付改善糖尿病护理:马里兰州西部地区的经验教训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):48-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07918-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
3
Redesigning ambulatory care management for uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study of the impact of a Boot Camp model on outcomes.重新设计未控制 2 型糖尿病的门诊护理管理:“训练营”模式对结局影响的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Nov 13;7(1):e000731. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000731. eCollection 2019.
4
Population Health Innovations and Payment to Address Social Needs Among Patients and Communities With Diabetes.人口健康创新与支付,以满足糖尿病患者和社区的社会需求。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):928-973. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12522. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
Association of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Glycemic Control and Acute Metabolic Events Among Patients With Insulin-Treated Diabetes.实时连续血糖监测与接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的血糖控制和急性代谢事件的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2273-2284. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6530.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Effectiveness of a Health Coaching Intervention for Patient-Family Dyads to Improve Outcomes Among Adults With Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.健康教练干预对改善糖尿病患者及其家属结局的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2237960. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37960.
8
Assessment of Costs and Care Quality Associated With Major Surgical Procedures After Implementation of Maryland's Capitated Budget Model.评估马里兰州统包预算模式实施后主要手术相关的成本和护理质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126619. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26619.
9
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
10
New Frontiers in Diabetes Care: Quality Improvement Study of a Population Health Team in Rural Critical Access Hospitals.糖尿病护理新前沿:农村基层医疗保健医院人群健康团队的质量改进研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07928-0. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of hospital and health system initiatives to address Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) in the United States: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature.美国医院和卫生系统应对健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)举措的影响:同行评议文献的范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12494-2.
2
Social Risks and Health Care Use in Medically Complex Patients.医疗复杂患者的社会风险与医疗保健使用
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35199.
3
Characteristics of hospital and health system initiatives to address social determinants of health in the United States: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Population Health Innovations and Payment to Address Social Needs Among Patients and Communities With Diabetes.人口健康创新与支付,以满足糖尿病患者和社区的社会需求。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):928-973. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12522. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
New Horizons-Addressing Healthcare Disparities in Endocrine Disease: Bias, Science, and Patient Care.新视野-解决内分泌疾病中的医疗保健差异:偏见、科学和患者护理。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Nov 19;106(12):e4887-e4902. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab229.
3
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: .
美国医院和卫生系统解决健康社会决定因素的举措特征:对同行评议文献的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 30;12:1413205. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1413205. eCollection 2024.
4
Financial Sustainability for Complex Care Models Serving Low-Income Patients: a New Role for Philanthropy.为服务低收入患者的复杂护理模式提供财务可持续性:慈善事业的新角色。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):78-80. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07930-6. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Community Health Collaborative Facilitates Health System and Community Change to Address Unmet Medical and Social Needs in New Jersey.社区健康协作组织推动卫生系统和社区变革,以满足新泽西州未得到满足的医疗和社会需求。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):65-69. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07927-1. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Integrated Interventions to Bridge Medical and Social Care for People Living with Diabetes.整合干预措施以弥合糖尿病患者的医疗和社会护理差距。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):4-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07926-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
7
New Frontiers in Diabetes Care: Quality Improvement Study of a Population Health Team in Rural Critical Access Hospitals.糖尿病护理新前沿:农村基层医疗保健医院人群健康团队的质量改进研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07928-0. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
8
"Everything in One Place": Stakeholder Perceptions of Integrated Medical and Social Care for Diabetes Patients in Western Maryland.“一站式服务”:马里兰州西部地区医疗和社会护理整合模式下糖尿病患者的利益相关者认知
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(Suppl 1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07919-1. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
改善人群的医疗保健和促进健康: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S7-S14. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S001.
4
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
5
Burden and management of type 2 diabetes in rural United States.美国农村 2 型糖尿病的负担和管理。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Jul;37(5):e3410. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3410. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016.美国按支付方和健康状况划分的医疗保健支出,1996-2016 年。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):863-884. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0734.
7
Impact of a community-based approach to patient engagement in rural, low-income adults with type 2 diabetes.社区参与模式对农村低收入 2 型糖尿病患者的影响。
Public Health Nurs. 2020 Mar;37(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/phn.12693. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Financing Diabetes Care in the U.S. Health System: Payment Innovations for Addressing the Medical and Social Determinants of Health.美国卫生系统中的糖尿病护理融资:解决医疗和社会健康决定因素的支付创新。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 20;19(11):136. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1275-6.
9
Maryland's Experiment With Capitated Payments For Rural Hospitals: Large Reductions In Hospital-Based Care.马里兰州对农村医院实行人头付费的实验:医院为基础的护理大幅减少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Apr;38(4):594-603. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05366.
10
Mississippi Diabetes Telehealth Network: A Collaborative Approach to Chronic Care Management.密西西比糖尿病远程医疗网络:慢性护理管理的协作方法。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Feb;26(2):184-189. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0334. Epub 2019 Mar 1.