Department of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;10(3):1771-1780. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14336. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
Liver fibrosis scores (LFSs) are non-invasive and effective tools for estimating cardiovascular risks. To better understand the advantages and limitations of currently available LFSs, we determined to compare the predictive values of LFSs in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) for primary composite outcome, atrial fibrillation (AF), and other clinical outcomes.
This was a secondary analysis of the TOPCAT trial, and 3212 HFpEF patients were enrolled. Five LFSs, namely, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), BARD, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio, and Health Utilities Index (HUI) scores were adopted. Cox proportional hazard model and competing risk regression model were performed to assess the associations between LFSs and outcomes. The discriminatory power of each LFS was evaluated by calculating the area under the curves (AUCs). During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, a 1-point increase in the NFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.17], BARD (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.10-1.30), and HUI (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.09-1.89) scores was associated with an increased risk of primary outcome. Patients with high levels of NFS (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.26-2.13), BARD (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25-2.15), AST/ALT ratio (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.05-1.60), and HUI (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.02-1.53) were at an increased risk of primary outcome. Subjects who developed AF were more likely to have high NFS (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.13-4.32). High levels of NFS and HUI scores were a significant predictor of any hospitalization and hospitalization for heart failure. The AUCs for the NFS in predicting primary outcome (0.672; 95% CI 0.642-0.702) and incident of AF (0.678; 95% CI 0.622-0.734) were higher than other LFSs.
In light of these findings, NFS appears to have superior predictive and prognostic utility compared with AST/ALT ratio, FIB-4, BARD, and HUI scores.
(https://clinicaltrials.gov). Unique identifier: NCT00094302.
肝纤维化评分(LFS)是评估心血管风险的一种非侵入性和有效的工具。为了更好地了解目前可用的 LFS 的优缺点,我们旨在比较 LFS 在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者中对主要复合结局、心房颤动(AF)和其他临床结局的预测价值。
这是 TOPCAT 试验的二次分析,共纳入 3212 例 HFpEF 患者。采用 5 种 LFS,即非酒精性脂肪性肝病纤维化评分(NFS)、纤维化-4 评分(FIB-4)、BARD、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)/丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)比值和健康效用指数(HUI)评分。采用 Cox 比例风险模型和竞争风险回归模型评估 LFS 与结局之间的关系。通过计算曲线下面积(AUCs)来评估每种 LFS 的判别能力。在中位随访 3.3 年期间,NFS 评分增加 1 分[风险比(HR)1.10;95%置信区间(CI)1.04-1.17]、BARD(HR 1.19;95% CI 1.10-1.30)和 HUI(HR 1.44;95% CI 1.09-1.89)与主要结局风险增加相关。NFS 评分较高的患者(HR 1.63;95% CI 1.26-2.13)、BARD(HR 1.64;95% CI 1.25-2.15)、AST/ALT 比值(HR 1.30;95% CI 1.05-1.60)和 HUI(HR 1.25;95% CI 1.02-1.53)发生主要结局的风险增加。发生 AF 的患者更有可能出现较高的 NFS(HR 2.21;95% CI 1.13-4.32)。NFS 和 HUI 评分较高是任何住院和心力衰竭住院的重要预测因素。NFS 预测主要结局(0.672;95% CI 0.642-0.702)和 AF 发生率(0.678;95% CI 0.622-0.734)的 AUC 高于其他 LFS。
基于这些发现,NFS 似乎比 AST/ALT 比值、FIB-4、BARD 和 HUI 评分具有更好的预测和预后价值。