Suppr超能文献

硼替佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松(VRd)与卡非佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松(KRd)作为新诊断多发性骨髓瘤诱导治疗的比较

Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRd) vs Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (KRd) as Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

作者信息

Tan Carlyn Rose, Derkach Andriy, Nemirovsky David, Ciardiello Amanda, Diamond Benjamin, Hultcrantz Malin, Hassoun Hani, Mailankody Sham, Shah Urvi, Maclachlan Kylee, Patel Dhwani, Lahoud Oscar, Landau Heather, Chung David, Shah Gunjan, Scordo Michael, Giralt Sergio, Lesokhin Alexander, Usmani Saad, Landgren Ola, Korde Neha

机构信息

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

MSKCC.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2023 Feb 24:rs.3.rs-2583053. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2583053/v1.

Abstract

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone with bortezomib (VRd) or carfilzomib (KRd) are commonly used induction regimens in the U.S. This single-center, retrospective study evaluated outcomes and safety of VRd and KRd. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Of 389 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 198 received VRd and 191 received KRd. Median PFS was not reached (NR) in both groups; 5-year PFS was 56% (95%CI, 48%-64%) for VRd and 67% (60%-75%) for KRd (P = 0.027). Estimated 5-year EFS was 34% (95%CI, 27%-42%) for VRd and 52% (45%-60%) for KRd (P < 0.001) with corresponding 5-year OS of 80% (95%CI, 75%-87%) and 90% (85%-95%), respectively (P = 0.053). For standard-risk patients, 5-year PFS was 68% (95%CI, 60%-78%) for VRd and 75% (65%-85%) for KRd (P = 0.20) with 5-year OS of 87% (95%CI, 81%-94%) and 93% (87%-99%), respectively (P = 0.13). For high-risk patients, median PFS was 41 months (95%CI, 32.8-61.1) for VRd and 70.9 months (58.2-NR) for KRd (P = 0.016). Respective 5-year PFS and OS were 35% (95%CI, 24%-51%) and 69% (58%-82%) for VRd and 58% (47%-71%) and 88% (80%-97%, P = 0.044) for KRd. Overall, KRd resulted in improved PFS and EFS with a trend toward improved OS compared to VRd with associations primarily driven by improvements in outcome for high-risk patients.

摘要

来那度胺、地塞米松联合硼替佐米(VRd)或卡非佐米(KRd)是美国常用的诱导治疗方案。这项单中心回顾性研究评估了VRd和KRd的疗效及安全性。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。在389例新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者中,198例接受VRd治疗,191例接受KRd治疗。两组的中位PFS均未达到(NR);VRd组的5年PFS为56%(95%CI,48%-64%),KRd组为67%(60%-75%)(P = 0.027)。VRd组的估计5年无事件生存期(EFS)为34%(95%CI,27%-42%),KRd组为52%(45%-60%)(P < 0.001),相应的5年总生存期(OS)分别为80%(95%CI,75%-87%)和90%(85%-95%)(P = 0.053)。对于标准风险患者,VRd组的5年PFS为68%(95%CI,60%-78%),KRd组为75%(65%-85%)(P = 0.20),5年OS分别为87%(95%CI,81%-94%)和93%(87%-99%)(P = 0.13)。对于高危患者,VRd组的中位PFS为41个月(95%CI,32.8-61.1),KRd组为70.9个月(58.2-NR)(P = 0.016)。VRd组的5年PFS和OS分别为35%(95%CI,24%-51%)和69%(58%-82%),KRd组分别为58%(47%-71%)和88%(80%-97%,P = 0.044)。总体而言,与VRd相比,KRd可改善PFS和EFS,OS也有改善趋势,主要是高危患者的预后得到改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f885/9980212/a2289063fa2f/nihpp-rs2583053v1-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验