Suppr超能文献

前侧电子髋关节疼痛绘图有助于诊断关节内疼痛来源:外侧或后侧绘图不可靠。

Anterior Electronic Hip Pain Drawings Are Helpful for Diagnosis of Intra-articular Sources of Pain: Lateral or Posterior Drawings Are Unreliable.

作者信息

Feng Richard, Hatem Munif, Martin Hal David

机构信息

Texas A&M College of Medicine at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.

Hip Preservation Center at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec 7;5(1):e87-e92. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.10.011. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of electronic hip pain drawing to diagnose intra-articular source of pain in nonarthritic hips, defined by response to an intra-articular injection.

METHODS

A retrospective assessment was performed in consecutive patients who had an intra-articular injection completed within a 1-year period. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders to intra-articular hip injection. A positive injection was defined as greater than 50% hip pain relief within 2 hours after injection. Electronic pain drawings collected before injection were then evaluated according to the hip region marked by the patients.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were studied after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Anterior hip pain on drawing had a sensitivity of 0.69, specificity of 0.68, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.86, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.44 for intraarticular source of pain. Posterior hip pain on drawing had a sensitivity of 0.59, specificity of 0.23, PPV of 0.68, and NPV of 0.17 for intra-articular source of pain. Lateral hip pain on drawing had a sensitivity of 0.62, specificity of 0.50, PPV of 0.78, and NPV of 0.32 for intraarticular source of pain.

CONCLUSION

Anterior hip pain on electronic drawing has a sensitivity of 0.69 and specificity of 0.68 for intra-articular source of pain in nonarthritic hips. Lateral and posterior hip pain on electronic pain drawings are not reliable to rule out intra-articular hip disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定电子髋部疼痛图诊断非关节炎性髋关节关节内疼痛来源的准确性,该疼痛来源由关节内注射的反应来定义。

方法

对在1年内完成关节内注射的连续患者进行回顾性评估。患者被分类为关节内髋部注射的反应者或无反应者。阳性注射定义为注射后2小时内髋部疼痛缓解超过50%。然后根据患者标记的髋部区域评估注射前收集的电子疼痛图。

结果

应用纳入和排除标准后,对83例患者进行了研究。对于关节内疼痛来源,图中髋部前方疼痛的敏感性为0.69,特异性为0.68,阳性预测值(PPV)为0.86,阴性预测值(NPV)为0.44。对于关节内疼痛来源,图中髋部后方疼痛的敏感性为0.59,特异性为0.23,PPV为0.68,NPV为0.17。对于关节内疼痛来源,图中髋部外侧疼痛的敏感性为0.62,特异性为0.50,PPV为0.78,NPV为0.32。

结论

对于非关节炎性髋关节的关节内疼痛来源,电子图中髋部前方疼痛的敏感性为0.69,特异性为0.68。电子疼痛图中髋部外侧和后方疼痛对于排除髋关节关节内疾病不可靠。

证据水平

III级,病例对照研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0488/9971901/02c1cd0cb389/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验