• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

握力健康干预措施预防社会经济地位较低的工人的健康问题:一项试点实施研究。

The Grip on Health Intervention to Prevent Health Problems Among Workers With a Lower Socioeconomic Position: A Pilot Implementation Study.

机构信息

From the Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jun 1;65(6):e363-e371. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002826. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002826
PMID:36866768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10227936/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Workers with a lower socioeconomic position (SEP) often face problems on multiple life domains. This study evaluated an intervention to identify and solve problems on multiple life domains, called "Grip on Health."

METHODS

A mixed-methods process evaluation was performed among occupational health professionals (OHPs) and lower SEP workers with problems on multiple life domains.

RESULTS

Thirteen OHPs delivered the intervention to 27 workers. For seven workers, the supervisor was involved, and for two, stakeholders from outside the workplace were involved. Agreements between OHPs with employers often affected implementation. OHPs were essential to help workers identify and solve problems. The intervention increased workers' health awareness and self-control, and led to small and practical solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Grip on Health can support lower SEP workers with solving problems on multiple life domains. However, contextual factors make implementation difficult.

摘要

目的

社会经济地位较低的工人往往面临多个生活领域的问题。本研究评估了一种干预措施,旨在识别和解决多个生活领域的问题,称为“健康掌控”。

方法

对职业健康专业人员(OHPs)和面临多个生活领域问题的社会经济地位较低的工人进行了混合方法的过程评估。

结果

13 名 OHPs 将干预措施提供给了 27 名工人。其中 7 名工人的主管参与其中,2 名工人的工作场所外部利益相关者参与其中。OHPs 与雇主之间的协议往往会影响实施。OHPs 是帮助工人识别和解决问题的关键。该干预措施提高了工人的健康意识和自我控制能力,并提出了小而实用的解决方案。

结论

“健康掌控”可以帮助社会经济地位较低的工人解决多个生活领域的问题。然而,实施过程中存在着各种因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb61/10227936/d98386a8cdde/joem-65-e363-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb61/10227936/d98386a8cdde/joem-65-e363-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb61/10227936/d98386a8cdde/joem-65-e363-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Grip on Health Intervention to Prevent Health Problems Among Workers With a Lower Socioeconomic Position: A Pilot Implementation Study.握力健康干预措施预防社会经济地位较低的工人的健康问题:一项试点实施研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jun 1;65(6):e363-e371. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002826. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
2
Improving the health of workers with a low socioeconomic position: Intervention Mapping as a useful method for adaptation of the Participatory Approach.改善社会经济地位较低的工人的健康:参与式方法的有益方法——干预映射法的应用。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09028-2.
3
A Context Analysis with Stakeholders' Views for Future Implementation of Interventions to Prevent Health Problems Among Employees with a Lower Socioeconomic Position.利益相关者观点的背景分析,以未来实施干预措施预防社会经济地位较低的员工健康问题。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Sep;32(3):438-451. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10010-x. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
5
Process evaluation of the 'Grip on Health' intervention in general and occupational health practice.“健康之握”干预在一般和职业健康实践中的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 30;22(1):1459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08801-w.
6
[The present state and forthcoming problems in the work of occupational health physicians engaged in the workplace].从事工作场所职业健康医生工作的现状与未来问题
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2002 Nov;44(6):224-35. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.kj00001039884.
7
Strengthening supervisor support for employees with common mental health problems: developing a workplace intervention using intervention mapping.加强主管对有常见心理健康问题员工的支持:使用干预映射开发工作场所干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 8;22(1):1146. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13545-7.
8
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
9
Workplace Health Promotion Among Ethnically Diverse Women in Midlife With a Low Socioeconomic Position.工作场所健康促进对中低收入、种族多样化的中年女性的影响。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):1042-1055. doi: 10.1177/10901981211071030. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
10
Training on involving cognitions and perceptions in the occupational health management and work disability assessment of workers: development and evaluation.培训员工在职业健康管理和工作残疾评估中涉及认知和感知:发展与评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03084-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing a workplace participatory approach to support working caregivers in balancing their work, private life and informal care: results of a process evaluation.实施工作场所参与式方法以支持在职照顾者平衡工作、私人生活和非正式护理:过程评估结果
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21100-9.
2
Process evaluation of the 'Grip on Health' intervention in general and occupational health practice.“健康之握”干预在一般和职业健康实践中的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 30;22(1):1459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08801-w.