• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯促进健康生活方式可能无法显著降低中国老年人与社会经济不平等相关的死亡风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Promotion of Healthy Lifestyles Alone Might Not Substantially Reduce Socioeconomic Inequity-Related Mortality Risk in Older People in China: A Prospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, China.

Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shuangliu District, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Jun;13(2):322-332. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00095-3. Epub 2023 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1007/s44197-023-00095-3
PMID:36870002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10272001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether healthy lifestyles mediate the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with mortality in older people is largely unknown.

METHODS

A total of 22,093 older participants (age ≥ 65 years) from 5 waves (2002-2014) of Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey cohort were included for analysis. Mediation analysis of lifestyles on the association of SES with all-cause mortality was conducted.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 4.92 ± 4.03 years, 15,721 (71.76%) deaths occurred. Compared with high SES, medium SES increased the risk of mortality by 13.5% (HR [total effect]: 1.135, 95% CI 1.067-1.205, p < 0.001), and the total effect was not mediated by healthy lifestyles (mediation proportion: - 0.1%, 95% CI - 3.8 to 3.3%, p = 0.936). The total effect when participants of low SES were compared with participants of high SES was HR = 1.161 (95% CI 1.088-1.229, p < 0.001) for mortality, and the total effect was modestly mediated through healthy lifestyles (mediation proportion: - 8.9%, 95% CI - 16.6 to - 5.1%, p < 0.001). Stratification analyses by sex, age and comorbidities, as well as a series of sensitivity analyses indicated similar results. In addition, mortality risk showed a downward trend with increased number of healthy lifestyles within each SES level (all p for trend < 0.050).

CONCLUSION

Promotion of healthy lifestyles alone can only reduce a small proportion of socioeconomic inequity-related mortality risk in older Chinese people. Even so, healthy lifestyles are important in reducing the overall mortality risk within each SES level.

摘要

背景

健康生活方式是否能调节社会经济地位(SES)与老年人死亡率之间的关联,目前还知之甚少。

方法

本研究共纳入了来自中国长寿纵向研究(CLHLS)5 个波次(2002-2014 年)的 22093 名年龄≥65 岁的老年人。采用中介分析方法探讨生活方式在 SES 与全因死亡率之间的关联中的作用。

结果

在平均 4.92±4.03 年的随访期间,共发生 15721 例死亡(71.76%)。与高 SES 相比,中 SES 使死亡风险增加了 13.5%(总效应 HR:1.135,95%CI:1.067-1.205,p<0.001),且健康生活方式并未介导这一总效应(中介比例:-0.1%,95%CI:-3.8 至 3.3%,p=0.936)。与高 SES 相比,低 SES 使死亡风险增加了 HR=1.161(95%CI:1.088-1.229,p<0.001),健康生活方式对这一总效应的介导作用较小(中介比例:-8.9%,95%CI:-16.6 至-5.1%,p<0.001)。按性别、年龄和合并症进行分层分析以及一系列敏感性分析均得到了相似的结果。此外,在每个 SES 水平内,健康生活方式的数量增加与死亡率呈下降趋势(所有 p 趋势值<0.050)。

结论

仅促进健康的生活方式只能降低中国老年人中一小部分与社会经济不平等相关的死亡风险。即便如此,健康的生活方式对于降低每个 SES 水平内的总体死亡风险仍然很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2529/10272001/5f2b1c9b47ce/44197_2023_95_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2529/10272001/1b90b70d84fc/44197_2023_95_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2529/10272001/ac0ea25a2a39/44197_2023_95_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2529/10272001/5f2b1c9b47ce/44197_2023_95_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2529/10272001/1b90b70d84fc/44197_2023_95_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2529/10272001/ac0ea25a2a39/44197_2023_95_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2529/10272001/5f2b1c9b47ce/44197_2023_95_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Promotion of Healthy Lifestyles Alone Might Not Substantially Reduce Socioeconomic Inequity-Related Mortality Risk in Older People in China: A Prospective Cohort Study.单纯促进健康生活方式可能无法显著降低中国老年人与社会经济不平等相关的死亡风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Jun;13(2):322-332. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00095-3. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
2
Associations of healthy lifestyle and socioeconomic status with mortality and incident cardiovascular disease: two prospective cohort studies.健康生活方式和社会经济地位与死亡率和心血管疾病发病的关联:两项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Apr 14;373:n604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n604.
3
Associations of Socioeconomic Status and Healthy Lifestyle With Incidence of Dyslipidemia: A Prospective Chinese Governmental Employee Cohort Study.社会经济地位和健康生活方式与血脂异常发生率的关联:一项前瞻性的中国政府雇员队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:878126. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.878126. eCollection 2022.
4
The dilution effect of healthy lifestyles on the risk of cognitive function attributed to socioeconomic status among Chinese older adults: A national wide prospective cohort study.健康生活方式对中国老年人认知功能与社会经济地位关联的稀释效应:一项全国范围的前瞻性队列研究。
J Glob Health. 2024 Feb 2;14:04010. doi: 10.7189/jogh-14-04010.
5
Overall lifestyles and socioeconomic inequity in mortality and life expectancy in China: the China health and nutrition survey.中国全人群生活方式和社会经济不平等与期望寿命变化的关系:中国健康与营养调查。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jul 1;51(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac167.
6
Childhood and adult socioeconomic status influence on late-life healthy longevity: evidence from the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey.童年和成年社会经济地位对晚年健康长寿的影响:来自中国长寿纵向研究的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;12:1352937. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352937. eCollection 2024.
7
Associations of healthy lifestyle and three latent socioeconomic status patterns with physical multimorbidity among middle-aged and older adults in China.中国中老年人健康生活方式及三种潜在社会经济地位模式与身体多种疾病并存的关联
Prev Med. 2023 Oct;175:107693. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107693. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
8
Socioeconomic status as a moderator between frailty and mortality at old ages.社会经济地位作为老年衰弱与死亡率之间的调节因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Aug 9;16:151. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0322-2.
9
Associations of socioeconomic status and healthy lifestyle with incident early-onset and late-onset dementia: a prospective cohort study.社会经济地位和健康生活方式与早发性和晚发性痴呆发病的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023 Dec;4(12):e693-e702. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00211-8.
10
Independent and Joint Associations of Socioeconomic Status and Lifestyle behaviors with Cognitive Impairment among Elderly Chinese Population.社会经济地位和生活方式行为对中国老年人群认知障碍的独立和联合关联。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(5):1513-1522. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.127.

引用本文的文献

1
Mutual Associations of Healthy Behaviours and Socioeconomic Status with Respiratory Diseases Mortality: A Large Prospective Cohort Study.健康行为和社会经济地位与呼吸系统疾病死亡率的相互关联:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Apr 13;15(8):1872. doi: 10.3390/nu15081872.

本文引用的文献

1
Plant-based dietary patterns in relation to mortality among older adults in China.中国老年人基于植物的饮食模式与死亡率的关系。
Nat Aging. 2022 Mar;2(3):224-230. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00180-5. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
The obesity paradox is mostly driven by decreased noncardiovascular disease mortality in the oldest old in China: a 20-year prospective cohort study.肥胖悖论在中国最年长者中主要由非心血管疾病死亡率降低所致:一项20年前瞻性队列研究
Nat Aging. 2022 May;2(5):389-396. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00201-3. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Aging in China: Challenges and Opportunities.
中国的老龄化:挑战与机遇。
China CDC Wkly. 2022 Jul 8;4(27):601-602. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2022.130.
4
Relationship of neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status on mortality among older adults: Evidence from cross-level interaction analyses.社区和个体社会经济地位与老年人死亡率的关系:来自跨层次交互分析的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0267542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267542. eCollection 2022.
5
CMAverse: A Suite of Functions for Reproducible Causal Mediation Analyses.CMAverse:一套用于可重复因果中介分析的函数。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):e20-e22. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001378.
6
Associations of healthy lifestyle and socioeconomic status with mortality and incident cardiovascular disease: two prospective cohort studies.健康生活方式和社会经济地位与死亡率和心血管疾病发病的关联:两项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Apr 14;373:n604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n604.
7
Management and Prevention Strategies for Non-communicable Diseases (NCDs) and Their Risk Factors.非传染性疾病(NCDs)及其风险因素的管理与预防策略
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;8:574111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.574111. eCollection 2020.
8
Is an unhealthy lifestyle more harmful for poor people?不健康的生活方式对穷人的危害更大吗?
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Dec;3(12):e558-e559. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30237-8. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
9
The effect of socioeconomic deprivation on the association between an extended measurement of unhealthy lifestyle factors and health outcomes: a prospective analysis of the UK Biobank cohort.社会经济剥夺对不健康生活方式因素的广泛测量与健康结果之间关联的影响:对英国生物库队列的前瞻性分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Dec;3(12):e576-e585. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30200-7. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
New Chinese dietary guidelines: healthy eating patterns and food-based dietary recommendations.新中国膳食指南:健康饮食模式与基于食物的膳食建议。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(4):908-913. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.072018.03.