Souza Curinga Míria Rafaelli, Claudino Ribeiro Anne Kaline, de Moraes Sandra Lúcia Dantas, do Egito Vasconcelos Belmiro Cavalcanti, da Fonte Porto Carreiro Adriana, Pellizzer Eduardo Piza
PhD student, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Associate Professor, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jan;133(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.032. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
Providing a removable partial denture (RPD) can be a complex, time-consuming, and error-prone procedure. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques have shown promising clinical outcomes; however, the influence of manufacturing techniques on the properties of RPD components is unclear.
The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy and mechanical properties of RPD components fabricated with conventional and digital methods.
This study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022353993). An electronic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in August 2022. Only in vitro studies comparing the digital with the lost-wax casting technique were included. The quality of the studies was assessed by using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) scale.
Of the 17 selected studies, 5 evaluated the accuracy of RPD components as well as the mechanical properties, 5 studies evaluated only the component accuracy, and another 7 evaluated only the mechanical properties. The accuracy was similar regardless of the technique, with discrepancies within clinically acceptable values (50 to 426.3 μm). The surface roughness was higher for 3D-printed clasps and lower for milled clasps (P<.05). The metal alloy significantly influenced the porosity, with the highest number of pores obtained by casting for Ti clasps and by rapid prototyping for Co-Cr clasps.
In vitro studies showed that the digital technique provided similar accuracy to that of the conventional technique within a clinically acceptable range. The manufacturing technique influenced the mechanical properties of RPD components.
提供可摘局部义齿(RPD)可能是一个复杂、耗时且容易出错的过程。计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)技术已显示出良好的临床效果;然而,制造技术对RPD部件性能的影响尚不清楚。
本系统评价的目的是确定采用传统方法和数字方法制作的RPD部件的精度和力学性能。
本研究遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO)数据库(CRD42022353993)中注册。2022年8月在PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、科学网和Cochrane图书馆进行了电子检索。仅纳入比较数字技术与失蜡铸造技术的体外研究。采用非随机研究方法学指标(MINORS)量表评估研究质量。
在17项选定的研究中,5项评估了RPD部件的精度以及力学性能,5项研究仅评估了部件精度,另外7项仅评估了力学性能。无论采用何种技术,精度都相似,差异在临床可接受值(50至426.3μm)范围内。3D打印卡环的表面粗糙度较高,铣削卡环的表面粗糙度较低(P<0.05)。金属合金对孔隙率有显著影响,钛卡环铸造获得的孔隙数量最多,钴铬卡环快速成型获得的孔隙数量最多。
体外研究表明,在临床可接受范围内,数字技术提供的精度与传统技术相似。制造技术影响RPD部件的力学性能。