• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性安慰剂-非临床样本的实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Open-label placebos-a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies with non-clinical samples.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Occupational Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 4;13(1):3640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30362-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-30362-z
PMID:36871028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985604/
Abstract

The use of open-label placebos (OLPs) has shown to be effective in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether OLPs are effective in experimental studies with non-clinical populations. We searched five databases on April 15, 2021. We conducted separate analyses for self-reported and objective outcomes and examined whether the level of suggestiveness of the instructions influenced the efficacy of OLPs. Of the 3573 identified records, 20 studies comprising 1201 participants were included, of which 17 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The studies investigated the effect of OLPs on well-being, pain, stress, arousal, wound healing, sadness, itchiness, test anxiety, and physiological recovery. We found a significant effect of OLPs for self-reported outcomes (k = 13; standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.28, 0.58; I = 7.2%), but not for objective outcomes (k = 8; SMD =  - 0.02; 95% CI =  - 0.25, 0.21; I = 43.6%). The level of suggestiveness of the instructions influenced the efficacy of OLPs for objective outcomes (p = 0.02), but not for self-reported outcomes. The risk of bias was moderate for most studies, and the overall quality of the evidence was rated low to very low. In conclusion, OLPs appear to be effective when examined in experimental studies. However, further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying OLPs.

摘要

开放式安慰剂(OLP)在临床试验中已被证明是有效的。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以检查 OLPs 在非临床人群的实验研究中是否有效。我们于 2021 年 4 月 15 日在五个数据库中进行了检索。我们分别对自我报告和客观结果进行了分析,并检查了指示的暗示程度是否会影响 OLPs 的疗效。在 3573 条记录中,有 20 项研究纳入了 1201 名参与者,其中 17 项研究符合荟萃分析的条件。这些研究调查了 OLPs 对幸福感、疼痛、压力、唤醒、伤口愈合、悲伤、瘙痒、考试焦虑和生理恢复的影响。我们发现 OLPs 对自我报告结果有显著影响(k=13;标准化均数差(SMD)=0.43;95%置信区间(CI)=0.28, 0.58;I²=7.2%),但对客观结果没有影响(k=8;SMD=−0.02;95%CI=−0.25, 0.21;I²=43.6%)。指示的暗示程度会影响 OLPs 对客观结果的疗效(p=0.02),但不会影响自我报告结果。大多数研究的偏倚风险为中度,证据的总体质量被评为低到极低。总之,OLPs 在实验研究中似乎是有效的。然而,需要进一步的研究来更好地理解 OLPs 的作用机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/48ed46b15596/41598_2023_30362_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/41d484f86724/41598_2023_30362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/2134ddf8d84f/41598_2023_30362_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/600f22f516bb/41598_2023_30362_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/a72d7b1372a5/41598_2023_30362_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/48ed46b15596/41598_2023_30362_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/41d484f86724/41598_2023_30362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/2134ddf8d84f/41598_2023_30362_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/600f22f516bb/41598_2023_30362_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/a72d7b1372a5/41598_2023_30362_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4de/9985604/48ed46b15596/41598_2023_30362_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Open-label placebos-a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies with non-clinical samples.开放性安慰剂-非临床样本的实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 4;13(1):3640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30362-z.
2
Effects of open-label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性安慰剂在临床试验中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83148-6.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Treating Pain With Open-Label Placebos: A Qualitative Study With Post-Surgical Pain Patients.用开放式安慰剂治疗疼痛:一项针对术后疼痛患者的定性研究。
J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1518-1529. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents.针对儿童和青少年与针头相关的操作疼痛及痛苦的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4.
7
How orthopedic surgeons view open label placebo pills: Ethical and effective, but opposed to personal use.骨科医生如何看待开放性标签安慰剂丸:伦理上有效,但反对个人使用。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Dec;151:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110638. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer.音乐干预对改善癌症患者心理和生理结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4.
9
Primary care providers' use of and attitudes towards placebos: An exploratory focus group study with US physicians.初级保健提供者对安慰剂的使用和态度:一项美国医生的探索性焦点小组研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):596-614. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12429. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
Mobile apps to reduce depressive symptoms and alcohol use in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.减少青少年抑郁症状和酒精使用的移动应用程序:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 26;20(2):e1398. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1398. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of open-label placebos across populations and outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.开放标签安慰剂在不同人群和结局中的效果:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 15;15(1):29940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14895-z.
2
A systematic review and meta analysis of open label placebo effects in chronic musculoskeletal pain.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中开放标签安慰剂效应的系统评价与荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):24007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09415-y.
3
Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Motor Performance: An Overview of Reviews.

本文引用的文献

1
Open-Label Placebo Interventions With Drinking Water and Their Influence on Perceived Physical and Mental Well-Being.饮用水的开放标签安慰剂干预及其对感知身心健康的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 6;12:658275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658275. eCollection 2021.
2
Effects of Open-Label Placebos on State Anxiety and Glucocorticoid Stress Responses.开放标签安慰剂对状态焦虑和糖皮质激素应激反应的影响。
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 16;11(4):508. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11040508.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
运动表现中的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应:综述概述
Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70534. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70534.
4
Noble Humbug? Hard and soft laws on clinical placebo use.高尚的骗局?关于临床安慰剂使用的软硬法律
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 12;16:1520664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1520664. eCollection 2025.
5
Open-label placebo for non-specific pain in the emergency department (OLP EM): study protocol for a mixed-method randomised control feasibility study in Switzerland.急诊科非特异性疼痛的开放标签安慰剂研究(OLP EM):瑞士一项混合方法随机对照可行性研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 25;15(3):e090508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090508.
6
Beyond Needling: Integrating a Bayesian Brain Model into Acupuncture Treatment.超越针刺疗法:将贝叶斯脑模型融入针灸治疗
Brain Sci. 2025 Feb 13;15(2):192. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020192.
7
Open label placebo for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.开放标签安慰剂治疗慢性腰痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Pain Manag. 2025 Mar;15(3):149-160. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2467025. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
8
Reducing Emotional Distress with Open-Label Placebos: Assessing the Role of Motor Engagement in Pill Consumption.使用开放标签安慰剂减轻情绪困扰:评估运动参与在吞服药物过程中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 29;14(6):455. doi: 10.3390/bs14060455.
9
Effectiveness of Korean Red Ginseng on fatigue in patients with rheumatic diseases: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.红参对风湿性疾病患者疲劳的有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):680-690. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.350. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
10
Open-label placebos enhance test performance and reduce anxiety in learner drivers: a randomized controlled trial.开放性安慰剂可提高学习者驾驶员的考试表现并降低焦虑:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 20;14(1):6684. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56600-6.
《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
4
Effects of open-label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性安慰剂在临床试验中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83148-6.
5
Open-Label Placebo Treatment: Outcome Expectations and General Acceptance in the Lay Population.开放标签安慰剂治疗:普通人群的结果预期和普遍接受度
Int J Behav Med. 2021 Aug;28(4):444-454. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09933-1. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
What Should Clinicians Tell Patients about Placebo and Nocebo Effects? Practical Considerations Based on Expert Consensus.临床医生应告知患者关于安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的哪些信息?基于专家共识的实际考量。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(1):49-56. doi: 10.1159/000510738. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research.不仅仅是关于伦理开放性安慰剂研究的同意。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105893.
8
Placebos without deception reduce self-report and neural measures of emotional distress.不欺骗患者的安慰剂可减少自我报告和神经测量的情绪困扰。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 29;11(1):3785. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17654-y.
9
Primary care providers' use of and attitudes towards placebos: An exploratory focus group study with US physicians.初级保健提供者对安慰剂的使用和态度:一项美国医生的探索性焦点小组研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):596-614. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12429. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
Deceptive and Nondeceptive Placebos to Reduce Pain: An Experimental Study in Healthy Individuals.欺骗性和非欺骗性安慰剂减轻疼痛:健康个体的实验研究。
Clin J Pain. 2020 Feb;36(2):68-79. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000781.