• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决定游离 MS-TRAM 皮瓣和 DIEP 皮瓣使用的主要因素及乳房再造结果比较。

Main factors determining the use of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps and comparing the results of breast reconstruction.

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health, Kyiv, Ukraine.

National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, Kyiv, Ukraine.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2023 Jan;16(1):121-128. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0227.

DOI:10.25122/jml-2022-0227
PMID:36873129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9979175/
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the results of free MS-TRAM and DIEP-flap based on the volume of the transplant and the unique characteristics of blood flow in the tissues. The study included 83 patients, 42 in the MS-TRAM-flap reconstruction group and 41 in the DIEP-flap breast reconstruction group. In the MS-TRAM-flap group, 35 patients received delayed reconstruction, and 7 received one-stage breast reconstruction, including one case of bilateral transplantation. In the DIEP-flap group, 5 patients received one-stage reconstruction, and 36 received delayed reconstruction. Complications associated with the flap tissue were observed in 7 (16.67%) in the MS-TRAM-flap group and 8 (19.51%) cases in the DIEP-flap group. The total level of fat necrosis in MS-TRAM-flap was 7.14% (p=0.033), and in DIEP-flap, it was 9.75% (p=0.039) (2 patients had a substantial amount of fat necrosis, while 2 patients had a modest amount of focal fat necrosis). The number and diameter of perforators (including veins), as well as the transplant volume, are the primary determinants of whether to use a DIEP- or MS-TRAM-flap. DIEP-flap is preferred if there are 1-2 large artery perforators (≥1 mm) and tissue volume of 700-800 grams, while MS-TRAM-flap is used when the tissue volume is significant (>2/3 of standard TRAM-flap).

摘要

本研究旨在比较游离 MS-TRAM 和 DIEP 皮瓣的结果,基于移植体积和组织内独特的血流特征。研究纳入 83 例患者,42 例接受 MS-TRAM 皮瓣重建,41 例接受 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建。MS-TRAM 皮瓣组中,35 例接受延迟重建,7 例接受一期乳房重建,包括 1 例双侧移植。DIEP 皮瓣组中,5 例接受一期重建,36 例接受延迟重建。MS-TRAM 皮瓣组中有 7 例(16.67%)和 DIEP 皮瓣组中有 8 例(19.51%)发生与皮瓣组织相关的并发症。MS-TRAM 皮瓣的总脂肪坏死水平为 7.14%(p=0.033),DIEP 皮瓣为 9.75%(p=0.039)(2 例存在大量脂肪坏死,2 例存在少量局灶性脂肪坏死)。穿支(包括静脉)的数量和直径以及移植体积是决定使用 DIEP 或 MS-TRAM 皮瓣的主要因素。如果有 1-2 个大口径动脉穿支(≥1mm)和 700-800 克组织体积,建议选择 DIEP 皮瓣,而当组织体积较大(>标准 TRAM 皮瓣的 2/3)时,则使用 MS-TRAM 皮瓣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/7ea4b1e31b44/JMedLife-16-121-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/62a184c23883/JMedLife-16-121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/b191aa320eed/JMedLife-16-121-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/d2b686d7051b/JMedLife-16-121-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/1a9d0e84e12b/JMedLife-16-121-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/316d8711b276/JMedLife-16-121-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/7ea4b1e31b44/JMedLife-16-121-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/62a184c23883/JMedLife-16-121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/b191aa320eed/JMedLife-16-121-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/d2b686d7051b/JMedLife-16-121-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/1a9d0e84e12b/JMedLife-16-121-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/316d8711b276/JMedLife-16-121-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ae/9979175/7ea4b1e31b44/JMedLife-16-121-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Main factors determining the use of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps and comparing the results of breast reconstruction.决定游离 MS-TRAM 皮瓣和 DIEP 皮瓣使用的主要因素及乳房再造结果比较。
J Med Life. 2023 Jan;16(1):121-128. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0227.
2
Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.相较于 DIEP 皮瓣,保留肌肉的横形腹直肌肌皮瓣并不能保护乳房重建免受乳腺癌根治术后放疗的损害。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):223-233. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436845.92623.9a.
3
Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.游离腹直肌肌皮瓣和腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣中的脂肪坏死
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Sep;106(3):576-83. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200009030-00008.
4
Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?采用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP皮瓣)或保留肌肉的游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣(MS-2游离TRAM皮瓣)进行乳房重建:有差异吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Feb;115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000149404.57087.8e.
5
[The DIEP Flap as Method of Choice in Breast Reconstruction - Results and Protocol for Succesful Reconstruction].[腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣作为乳房重建的首选方法——成功重建的结果与方案]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2015 Aug;47(4):222-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398662. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
6
Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps.前瞻性分析游离 TRAM、DIEP 和 SIEA 皮瓣乳房重建术后脂肪坏死与穿支血管数量的关系。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 May;125(5):1335-1341. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb4a.
7
Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.双侧 TRAM 与双侧 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建术后的发病率、功能结果和满意度比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1133-1141. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42d3.
8
Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.游离腹直肌肌皮瓣或腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房再造:患者选择、皮瓣选择及效果
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00015.
9
DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣和带蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣:结局比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 May;117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000210679.77449.7d.
10
Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.游离与带蒂 TRAM 和 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建术的皮瓣灌注和供区并发症的荟萃分析。
Breast. 2018 Apr;38:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the Safety of DIEP Flap Transplantation: Detailed Perforator Anatomy Study Using Preoperative CTA.提高腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣移植的安全性:使用术前CTA进行详细的穿支解剖学研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 28;12(5):701. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050701.
2
Delayed breast reconstruction with tram-flap and various modifications after radical mastectomy.根治性乳房切除术后应用游离皮瓣和各种改良技术延迟乳房重建。
J Med Life. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):847-852. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0354.
3
Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A French Prospective Multicenter Study.
单侧即刻乳房重建术后并发症的相关危险因素:一项法国前瞻性多中心研究。
In Vivo. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):937-945. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12334.
4
Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer.乳腺癌的现代外科治疗
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jun 23;56:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.016. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Breast Reconstruction in Obese Patients: The Fat Grafted Latissimus versus Abdominal Free Tissue Transfer.肥胖患者的乳房重建:脂肪移植背阔肌与腹部游离组织移植对比
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 20;8(3):e2668. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002668. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Fat Necrosis After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Review of Perfusion-Related Causes.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术后脂肪坏死:灌注相关病因的综述。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Oct;44(5):1454-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01784-1. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Make Your Own Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap: Perforator Delay Improves Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Reliability.自制腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣:穿支延迟可提高腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣的可靠性。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Nov 27;7(11):e2478. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002478. eCollection 2019 Nov.
8
Preoperative cross-sectional mapping for deep inferior epigastric and profunda artery perforator flaps.腹壁下深动脉和旋股外侧动脉穿支皮瓣的术前横断面mapping
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Aug;9(Suppl 1):S131-S142. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.10.03.
9
Fat necrosis in the Breast: A systematic review of clinical.乳房脂肪坏死:临床的系统评价。
Lipids Health Dis. 2019 Jun 11;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1078-4.
10
The use of laser speckle contrast imaging to predict flap necrosis: An experimental study in a porcine flap model.应用激光散斑对比成像预测皮瓣坏死:一种猪皮瓣模型的实验研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 May;72(5):771-777. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.11.021. Epub 2019 Jan 3.