• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大社区医疗实践中房颤筛查的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation screening in Canadian community practice.

作者信息

Andrade Jason G, Shah Anshul, Godin Richard, Lanitis Tereza, Kongnakorn Thitima, Brown Lauren, Dhanda Devender, Dhamane Amol, Nault Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Nov 17;4(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2022.11.003
PMID:36873310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9975014/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contemporary guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of single time point opportunistic AF screening for patients 65 years and older by using the single-lead electrocardiogram.

METHODS

An established Markov cohort model was adapted by updating the background mortality estimates, epidemiology, screening efficacy, treatment patterns, resource use, and cost inputs to reflect a Canadian health care setting. Inputs were derived from a contemporary prospective screening study performed in Canadian primary care settings (screening efficacy and epidemiology) and the published literature (unit costs, epidemiology, mortality, utility, and treatment efficacy). The impact of screening and oral anticoagulant treatment on the cost and clinical outcomes was analyzed. A Canadian payer perspective over lifetime was used for analysis, with costs expressed in 2019 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

Among the estimated screening-eligible population of 2,929,301 patients, the screening cohort identified an additional 127,670 AF cases compared with the usual care cohort. The model estimated avoidance of 12,236 strokes and incremental quality-adjusted life-years of 59,577 (0.02 per patient) over lifetime in the screening cohort. Cost savings were substantial because of improved health outcomes, reflecting screening being the dominant strategy (affordable and effective). Model results were robust across sensitivity and scenario analyses.

CONCLUSION

Single time point opportunistic screening of AF using a single-lead electrocardiogram device in Canadian patients 65 years and older without known AF may provide improved health outcomes with cost savings from the perspective of a single payer health care environment.

摘要

背景

当代指南推荐对心房颤动(AF)进行机会性筛查。

目的

本研究的目的是通过使用单导联心电图评估对65岁及以上患者进行单时间点机会性AF筛查的成本效益。

方法

通过更新背景死亡率估计、流行病学、筛查效果、治疗模式、资源使用和成本投入来调整已建立的马尔可夫队列模型,以反映加拿大的医疗保健环境。数据来源于在加拿大初级保健机构进行的当代前瞻性筛查研究(筛查效果和流行病学)以及已发表的文献(单位成本、流行病学、死亡率、效用和治疗效果)。分析了筛查和口服抗凝治疗对成本和临床结局的影响。分析采用加拿大支付方在患者终身的视角,成本以2019年加拿大元表示。

结果

在估计的2929301例符合筛查条件的患者中,与常规护理队列相比,筛查队列额外发现了127670例AF病例。该模型估计筛查队列终身可避免12236例中风,增加质量调整生命年59577个(每位患者0.02个)。由于健康结局改善,成本节约显著,表明筛查是主要策略(经济有效)。模型结果在敏感性和情景分析中均稳健。

结论

从单一支付方医疗保健环境的角度来看,对65岁及以上无已知AF的加拿大患者使用单导联心电图设备进行单时间点机会性AF筛查可能会改善健康结局并节省成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b014/9975014/9babbd8ada45/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b014/9975014/b4fe272dc71f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b014/9975014/9babbd8ada45/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b014/9975014/b4fe272dc71f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b014/9975014/9babbd8ada45/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation screening in Canadian community practice.加拿大社区医疗实践中房颤筛查的成本效益
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Nov 17;4(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Cost-effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation in primary care with a handheld, single-lead electrocardiogram device in the Netherlands.荷兰基层医疗中使用手持式单导联心电图设备筛查心房颤动的成本效益分析。
Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):12-18. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw285.
3
A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study.一项针对65岁及以上人群检测心房颤动的系统筛查(针对性筛查和全人群筛查)与常规做法的随机对照试验及成本效益研究。SAFE研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Oct;9(40):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-74. doi: 10.3310/hta9400.
4
Screening strategies for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.心房颤动的筛查策略:系统评价与成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2017 May;21(29):1-236. doi: 10.3310/hta21290.
5
Cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the United Kingdom in older patients using digital approaches.数字手段在英国老年患者中非瓣膜性心房颤动的靶向筛查的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):326-334. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2179210.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Canadian Perspective.导管消融与抗心律失常药物治疗心房颤动的成本效益:加拿大视角
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct 26;3(1):1-12. doi: 10.36469/9837. eCollection 2015.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Extended and One-Time Screening Versus No Screening for Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in the USA.美国非瓣膜性心房颤动的扩展和一次性筛查与不筛查的成本效益比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Aug;18(4):533-545. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00542-y.
8
Is Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Canadian Family Practices Cost-Effective in Patients 65 Years and Older?加拿大家庭诊所中对 65 岁及以上患者进行心房颤动筛查是否具有成本效益?
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1522-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Effectiveness of systematic screening for the detection of atrial fibrillation.系统性筛查用于检测心房颤动的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD009586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009586.pub2.
10
Atrial Fibrillation Screen, Management, and Guideline-Recommended Therapy in the Rural Primary Care Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of eHealth Tools to Support All Stages of Screening.农村初级保健环境中心房颤动筛查、管理和指南推荐治疗:支持筛查各个阶段的电子健康工具的横断面研究和成本效益分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e017080. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017080. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.《2025年心脏病和中风统计数据:美国心脏协会关于美国和全球数据的报告》
Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Remote monitoring of atrial fibrillation recurrence using mHealth technology (REMOTE-AF).使用移动健康技术对房颤复发进行远程监测(REMOTE-AF)。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Feb 12;5(3):344-355. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae011. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.2020 年加拿大心血管学会/加拿大心律学会心房颤动管理综合指南。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Dec;36(12):1847-1948. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
2
Atrial Fibrillation Screen, Management, and Guideline-Recommended Therapy in the Rural Primary Care Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of eHealth Tools to Support All Stages of Screening.农村初级保健环境中心房颤动筛查、管理和指南推荐治疗:支持筛查各个阶段的电子健康工具的横断面研究和成本效益分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e017080. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017080. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Large-scale implementation of a pragmatic atrial fibrillation screening program in Canadian community practice.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):768-769. doi: 10.1111/pace.13966. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
4
Lead-I ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with an irregular pulse using single time point testing: a systematic review and economic evaluation.使用单点检测技术的 Lead-I ECG 检测不规则脉搏患者心房颤动:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(3):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta24030.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Extended and One-Time Screening Versus No Screening for Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in the USA.美国非瓣膜性心房颤动的扩展和一次性筛查与不筛查的成本效益比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Aug;18(4):533-545. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00542-y.
6
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Mobile, Single-Lead Electrocardiogram in Canadian Primary Care Clinics.使用移动单导联心电图在加拿大初级保健诊所筛查心房颤动。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Jul;35(7):840-845. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2933-2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232.
8
Is Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Canadian Family Practices Cost-Effective in Patients 65 Years and Older?加拿大家庭诊所中对 65 岁及以上患者进行心房颤动筛查是否具有成本效益?
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1522-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Electrocardiography: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.心电图筛查心房颤动:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):478-484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10321.
10
Screening for atrial fibrillation in Canadian pharmacies: an economic evaluation.加拿大药房中房颤的筛查:一项经济学评估。
CMAJ Open. 2017 Aug 22;5(3):E653-E661. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170042.