Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
Cancer Res Commun. 2022 Mar 21;2(3):172-181. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-21-0183. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Some clinically significant prostate cancers are missed by MRI. We asked whether the tumor stroma in surgically treated localized prostate cancer lesions positive or negative with MRI are different in their cellular and molecular properties, and whether the differences are reflected to the clinical course of the disease. We profiled the stromal and immune cell composition of MRI-classified tumor lesions by applying multiplexed fluorescence IHC (mfIHC) and automated image analysis in a clinical cohort of 343 patients (cohort I). We compared stromal variables between MRI-visible lesions, invisible lesions, and benign tissue and assessed the predictive significance for biochemical recurrence (BCR) and disease-specific survival (DSS) using Cox regression and log-rank analysis. Subsequently, we carried out a prognostic validation of the identified biomarkers in a population-based cohort of 319 patients (cohort II). MRI true-positive lesions are different from benign tissue and MRI false-negative lesions in their stromal composition. CD163 cells (macrophages) and fibroblast activation protein (FAP) cells were more abundant in MRI true-positive than in MRI false-negative lesions or benign areas. In MRI true-visible lesions, a high proportion of stromal FAP cells was associated with PTEN status and increased immune infiltration (CD8, CD163), and predicted elevated risk for BCR. High FAP phenotype was confirmed to be a strong indicator of poor prognosis in two independent patient cohorts using also conventional IHC. The molecular composition of the tumor stroma may determine whether early prostate lesions are detectable by MRI and associates with survival after surgical treatment.
These findings may have a significant impact on clinical decision making as more radical treatments may be recommended for men with a combination of MRI-visible primary tumors and FAP tumor stroma.
一些临床上显著的前列腺癌会被 MRI 漏诊。我们想知道,在 MRI 阳性或阴性的手术治疗局限性前列腺癌病变中,肿瘤基质在细胞和分子特性上是否存在差异,以及这些差异是否反映在疾病的临床过程中。我们通过在一个包含 343 名患者的临床队列(队列 I)中应用多重荧光免疫组化(mfIHC)和自动图像分析,对 MRI 分类的肿瘤病变的基质和免疫细胞组成进行了分析。我们比较了 MRI 可见病变、不可见病变和良性组织之间的基质变量,并使用 Cox 回归和对数秩分析评估了它们对生化复发(BCR)和疾病特异性生存(DSS)的预测意义。随后,我们在一个包含 319 名患者的基于人群的队列(队列 II)中对鉴定出的生物标志物进行了预后验证。MRI 真阳性病变与良性组织和 MRI 假阴性病变在基质组成上存在差异。与 MRI 假阴性病变或良性区域相比,CD163 细胞(巨噬细胞)和成纤维细胞激活蛋白(FAP)细胞在 MRI 真阳性病变中更为丰富。在 MRI 真可见病变中,基质中 FAP 细胞比例较高与 PTEN 状态和免疫浸润增加(CD8、CD163)相关,并预测 BCR 风险升高。使用传统免疫组化在两个独立的患者队列中证实,高 FAP 表型是预后不良的强烈指标。肿瘤基质的分子组成可能决定早期前列腺病变是否可被 MRI 检测到,并与手术治疗后的生存相关。
这些发现可能对临床决策产生重大影响,因为对于 MRI 可见原发性肿瘤和 FAP 肿瘤基质相结合的男性,可能会推荐更激进的治疗方法。