M Tamilarasan, Kulothungan Karthikeyan, Vignesh Nawin, George Neethu, Dharmaraj Rock B
Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Jan 30;15(1):e34411. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34411. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and lockdown had a significant impact on mental health during the last two years. However, the majority of studies do not concentrate on the risk and protective factors that influence the relationship between COVID-19 and subjective well-being. Therefore, the present study aims to identify such stressful experiences and the influence of COVID-19 and various stressors. Methodology We have conducted this community-based, cross-sectional, analytical study in the Perambalur district of Tamil Nadu for four months. After obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, we gathered data for the study. Two field practice areas were involved in data collection. A convenient sampling procedure was used to select 291 households for the study. The lead investigator interviewed one individual from each household, preferably the head of the family. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the pertinent information. The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) scale were used to assess anxiety and stress. All collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA), and SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to analyze the results. Results Among the participants, 34% had a history of COVID-19 infection, and 58.4% of the families had at least one chronic comorbidity among the family members. The CAS score was significantly associated with the residence (p = 0.049), marital status (p = 0.001), and previous history of COVID-19 (p = 0.016) of the study participants. The study found that gender was the only factor associated with both the PSS score (p = 0.022) and the GAD scale score (p = 0.010) of the study participants. Conclusions Even though doctors can treat many mental health illnesses for a comparatively minimal cost, there is still a wide disparity between those who require care and those who have access to it. Governmental programs and regulations that conduct routine surveys to identify anxiety and stress can lead to successful preventative strategies.
背景 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)大流行和封锁在过去两年对心理健康产生了重大影响。然而,大多数研究并未专注于影响 COVID - 19 与主观幸福感之间关系的风险和保护因素。因此,本研究旨在确定此类压力经历以及 COVID - 19 和各种压力源的影响。
方法 我们在泰米尔纳德邦的佩兰巴卢尔区进行了为期四个月的基于社区的横断面分析研究。在获得机构伦理委员会的批准后,我们收集了研究数据。两个实地实践区域参与了数据收集。采用方便抽样程序选择了 291 户家庭进行研究。首席调查员采访了每户中的一名成员,最好是户主。使用半结构化问卷收集相关信息。使用冠状病毒焦虑量表(CAS)、感知压力量表(PSS)和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)量表来评估焦虑和压力。所有收集的数据都输入到 Microsoft Excel(微软公司, 华盛顿州雷德蒙德)中,并使用 SPSS 软件版本 21(IBM 公司, 纽约州阿蒙克)分析结果。
结果 在参与者中,34%有 COVID - 19 感染史,58.4%的家庭中家庭成员至少有一种慢性合并症。CAS 得分与研究参与者的居住地(p = 0.049)、婚姻状况(p = 0.001)和既往 COVID - 19 病史(p = 0.016)显著相关。研究发现,性别是与研究参与者的 PSS 得分(p = 0.022)和 GAD 量表得分(p = 0.010)均相关的唯一因素。
结论 尽管医生能够以相对较低的成本治疗许多心理健康疾病,但在需要护理的人群和能够获得护理的人群之间仍存在巨大差距。开展常规调查以识别焦虑和压力的政府项目和法规能够带来成功的预防策略。