White Gwyne W, Hatchimonji Danielle R, Vaid Esha, Simmons Christopher C, Yuan May, Wang Angela, Elias Maurice J
Department of Psychology, Merrimack College, North Andover, MA, United States.
Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, DE, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 15;14:977680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.977680. eCollection 2023.
Investment in academic instruction without complementary attention to the social-emotional environment of students may lead to a failure of both. The current study evaluates a proposed mechanism for change, whereby academic achievement occurs as a result of the social-emotional learning environment impacting behavioral (discipline) outcomes.
We tested the hypothesized model during each year of a 3-year intervention to determine whether the relations among these constructs held potential as a pathway for targeted improvement.
Path analysis for each year demonstrated excellent fit [Year 1: (19) = 76.16, = 0.99, = 0.05, = 0.98; Year 2: (19) = 70.68, = 0.99, = 0.048, = 0.98; Year 3: (19) = 66.59, = 0.99, = 0.05, = 0.98] supporting the theoretical model for change. For each year the effect of the SEL Environment construct on discipline was significant, as was the effect of discipline on Academic Performance. Further, the indirect effect of SEL Environment on Academic Performance was significant across all years.
The consistency of these relationships supports the proposed logic model as a potential mechanism for change and has the potential to guide interventions for whole school improvement.
在对学术指导进行投资时,如果没有对学生的社会情感环境给予相应关注,可能会导致两者都失败。本研究评估了一种提议的变革机制,即学业成绩是社会情感学习环境影响行为(纪律)结果的产物。
我们在为期3年的干预的每年中对假设模型进行了测试,以确定这些构念之间的关系是否具有作为有针对性改进途径的潜力。
每年的路径分析都显示出良好的拟合度[第1年:χ²(19)=76.16,CFI=0.99,RMSEA=0.05,TLI=0.98;第2年:χ²(19)=70.68,CFI=0.99,RMSEA=0.048,TLI=0.98;第3年:χ²(19)=66.59,CFI=0.99,RMSEA=0.05,TLI=0.98],支持了变革的理论模型。每年社会情感学习环境构念对纪律的影响都是显著的,纪律对学业成绩的影响也是显著的。此外,社会情感学习环境对学业成绩的间接影响在所有年份都是显著的。
这些关系的一致性支持了所提议的逻辑模型作为一种潜在的变革机制,并有可能指导全校改进的干预措施。