Li Jianan, Zhu Ziling, Boyd William J, Martinez-Luna Carlos, Dai Chenyun, Wang Haopeng, Wang He, Huang Xinming, Farrell Todd R, Clancy Edward A
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 U.S.A.
Liberating Technologies, Inc., Holliston, MA 01746 U.S.A.
Biomed Signal Process Control. 2023 Apr;82. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104602. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
Most transradial prosthesis users with conventional "Sequential" myoelectric control have two electrode sites which control one degree of freedom (DoF) at a time. Rapid EMG co-activation toggles control between DoFs (e.g., hand and wrist), providing limited function. We implemented a regression-based EMG control method which achieved simultaneous and proportional control of two DoFs in a virtual task. We automated electrode site selection using a short-duration (90 s) calibration period, without force feedback. Backward stepwise selection located the best electrodes for either six or 12 electrodes (selected from a pool of 16). We additionally studied two, 2-DoF controllers: "Intuitive" control (hand open-close and wrist pronation-supination controlled virtual target size and rotation, respectively) and "Mapping" control (wrist flexion-extension and ulnar-radial deviation controlled virtual target left-right and up-down movement, respectively). In practice, a Mapping controller would be mapped to control prosthesis hand open-close and wrist pronation-supination. Eleven able-bodied subjects and 4 limb-absent subjects completed virtual target matching tasks (fixed target moves to a new location after being "matched," and subject immediately pursues) and fixed (static) target tasks. For all subjects, both 2-DoF controllers with 6 optimally-sited electrodes had statistically better target matching performance than Sequential control in number of matches (average of 4-7 vs. 2 matches, < 0.001) and throughput (average of 0.75-1.25 vs. 0.4 bits/s, < 0.001), but not overshoot rate and path efficiency. There were no statistical differences between 6 and 12 optimally-sited electrodes for both 2-DoF controllers. These results support the feasibility of 2-DoF simultaneous, proportional myoelectric control.
大多数使用传统“顺序”肌电控制的经桡动脉假肢使用者有两个电极位点,每次控制一个自由度(DoF)。快速肌电共同激活可在自由度之间切换控制(例如,手和手腕),功能有限。我们实施了一种基于回归的肌电控制方法,该方法在虚拟任务中实现了对两个自由度的同时和成比例控制。我们使用短时间(90秒)校准期自动选择电极位点,无需力反馈。向后逐步选择从16个电极中选出6个或12个最佳电极。我们还研究了两种双自由度控制器:“直观”控制(手的开合和手腕的旋前 - 旋后分别控制虚拟目标的大小和旋转)和“映射”控制(手腕的屈伸和尺桡偏分别控制虚拟目标的左右和上下移动)。在实际应用中,映射控制器将被映射为控制假肢的手开合和手腕旋前 - 旋后。11名健全受试者和4名肢体缺失受试者完成了虚拟目标匹配任务(固定目标在“匹配”后移动到新位置,受试者立即追踪)和固定(静态)目标任务。对于所有受试者,两种具有6个最佳位置电极的双自由度控制器在匹配次数(平均4 - 7次对2次匹配,<0.001)和吞吐量(平均0.75 - 1.25对0.4比特/秒,<0.001)方面的目标匹配性能在统计学上均优于顺序控制,但在过冲率和路径效率方面则不然。两种双自由度控制器在6个和12个最佳位置电极之间没有统计学差异。这些结果支持了双自由度同时、成比例肌电控制的可行性。