Suppr超能文献

直立位与仰卧位运动期间ST段压低频率的差异:在正常人和冠心病患者中的评估

Differences in the frequency of ST segment depression during upright and supine exercise: assessment in normals and in patients with coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Bairey C N, Rozanski A, Levey M, Berman D S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1987 Dec;114(6):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90531-x.

Abstract

Increased utilization of ambulatory ST segment monitoring mandates an appreciation of nonischemic variables that may influence the ST segment. While a greater frequency of ST segment depression has been reported with supine vs upright exercise, the relative false positive rate in both positions is not known. Thus, we compared the frequency of exercise ECG abnormalities during upright and supine bicycle exercise in two groups--17 normals and 46 patients with coronary artery disease. Exercise was performed in combination with radionuclide ventriculographic imaging. Peak exercise heart rate, peak systolic blood pressure, and exercise duration time were all slightly higher in the upright vs supine position (p less than 0.05). Nevertheless, the frequency of positive ST segment responses was more common in the supine position, both in the patients with coronary artery disease (54% vs 30%, p less than 0.05) and in the normal subjects (29% vs 6%, p = NS). The corresponding radionuclide ventriculographic responses, however, were normal during upright and supine exercise in 6 of the 11 CAD patients and in all five of the normal subjects with an abnormal ST segment response during supine exercise only. The frequency of exercise-induced chest pain was also similar in the two positions. Thus, we theorize that nonischemic factors may govern some positive ST segment responses in the supine position. This finding is of relevance for understanding the potential sources of physiologic false positive ST segment responses for ambulatory ST segment monitoring.

摘要

动态ST段监测的使用增加,这就要求我们了解可能影响ST段的非缺血性变量。虽然有报道称,与直立运动相比,仰卧运动时ST段压低的频率更高,但两种体位下的相对假阳性率尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了两组人群(17名正常人及46名冠心病患者)在直立和仰卧位骑自行车运动期间运动心电图异常的频率。运动与放射性核素心室造影成像同时进行。直立位时的运动峰值心率、收缩压峰值和运动持续时间均略高于仰卧位(p<0.05)。然而,无论是冠心病患者(54%对30%,p<0.05)还是正常受试者(29%对6%,p=无显著差异),仰卧位时ST段阳性反应的频率都更高。然而,在11名冠心病患者中的6名以及仅在仰卧位运动时ST段反应异常的所有5名正常受试者中,直立和仰卧运动期间相应的放射性核素心室造影反应均正常。两个体位下运动诱发胸痛的频率也相似。因此,我们推测非缺血性因素可能在仰卧位时导致一些ST段阳性反应。这一发现对于理解动态ST段监测中生理性假阳性ST段反应的潜在来源具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验