Eichhorn E J, Konstam M A, Weiland D S, Roberts D J, Martin T T, Stransky N B, Salem D N
Department of Medicine, Tufts University, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Dec 1;60(16):1329-33. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90616-3.
To compare the effects of intravenous dobutamine and milrinone on right ventricular (RV) systolic function, 14 patients with severe congestive heart failure underwent simultaneous radionuclide-hemodynamic study. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous milrinone (50 micrograms/kg bolus then 0.5 microgram/kg/min) or dobutamine (2.5 to 15 micrograms/kg/min) to achieve equal increases in cardiac output. Both drugs significantly improved cardiac performance, with identical 24% increases in mean cardiac index (p less than 0.05 vs baseline; difference not significant for milrinone vs dobutamine) and no change in heart rate. Neither drug substantially altered RV preload, as reflected by mean right atrial pressure and RV end-diastolic volume. Both drugs caused similar increases in RV ejection fraction (mean +/- standard deviation; dobutamine: 0.32 +/- 0.09 to 0.40 +/- 0.11; p less than 0.05; milrinone: 0.35 +/- 0.19 to 0.43 +/- 0.21; p less than 0.05) resulting from reductions in RV end-systolic volume. RV afterload reduction contributed substantially to drug effect on RV systolic performance in patients treated with milrinone but not those treated with dobutamine. With doses effecting equal increases in cardiac index and RV systolic performance, pulmonary artery end-systolic pressure was significantly reduced by milrinone (40 +/- 12 to 33 +/- 12 mm Hg; p less than 0.05), but not by dobutamine. Thus, in patients with congestive heart failure milrinone's effect on RV systolic function is explainable, at least in part, by RV afterload reduction, whereas RV inotropic augmentation contributed more strongly to dobutamine's effect.
为比较静脉注射多巴酚丁胺和米力农对右心室(RV)收缩功能的影响,14例重度充血性心力衰竭患者接受了同步放射性核素-血流动力学研究。患者被随机分为接受静脉注射米力农(50微克/千克负荷量,然后0.5微克/千克/分钟)或多巴酚丁胺(2.5至15微克/千克/分钟),以使心输出量有同等增加。两种药物均显著改善了心脏功能,平均心脏指数均增加了24%(与基线相比p<0.05;米力农与多巴酚丁胺之间差异不显著),且心率无变化。两种药物均未实质性改变RV前负荷,这可通过平均右心房压力和RV舒张末期容积反映出来。两种药物均使RV射血分数有相似增加(平均值±标准差;多巴酚丁胺:从0.32±0.09增至0.40±0.11;p<0.05;米力农:从0.35±0.19增至0.43±0.21;p<0.05),这是由于RV收缩末期容积减少所致。在接受米力农治疗的患者中,RV后负荷降低对药物对RV收缩功能的作用有很大贡献,但在接受多巴酚丁胺治疗的患者中并非如此。在使心脏指数和RV收缩功能有同等增加的剂量下,米力农可使肺动脉收缩末期压力显著降低(从40±12降至33±12毫米汞柱;p<0.05),而多巴酚丁胺则无此作用。因此,在充血性心力衰竭患者中,米力农对RV收缩功能的作用至少部分可通过降低RV后负荷来解释,而RV正性肌力增强对多巴酚丁胺的作用贡献更大。